期刊文献+

多优先级业务流多通道并行传输

Concurrent multipath transfer for multi-priority service flows
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对已有的多业务流多通道并行传输不支持业务流之间优先级的问题,将业务的优先级映射到多个通道,建立了具有优先级保证的多业务流多通道数据传输模型。基于排队论知识将模型抽象成多维Markov链,并使用两阶段的PH分布将多维Markov链近似成一维Markov链,采用矩阵分析方法对模型进行定量分析,推导出系统的平均队长和平均等待时间。通过数值分析与简单多业务流单通道、多优先级业务流单通道、简单多业务流多通道这三种传输模型进行了比较。结果表明,不管业务流达到率如何变化,多优先级业务流多通道并行传输模型中的高优先级数据包均能够获得较高的处理能力,说明了该模型能够支持多通道并行传输中业务流之间的优先控制。 Existing concurrent multipath transfer for multi-service can’t support the priorities of the services.This paper proposed a multi-priority concurrent multipath transfer model for multi-service by mapping the service priorities to multipath.Based on queuing theory,it used a multi-dimension Markov chain to describe the model and converted the multi-dimension Markov chain to one-dimension by a two-phase PH distribution.Then it studied the model quantitatively through matrix analy-tic methods,from which it derived the average queue length and average waiting time of the model.Finally,compared the proposed model with simple multi-service single path model,multi-priority service single path model and simple multi-service multipath model through numerical analysis.The results show that the packets with higher priority of the multi-priority service multipath model can obtain higher processing capability no matter how the service arrival rate changes,which illustrates that the multi-priority service multipath model can support the priorities of the services in concurrent multipath transfer
出处 《计算机应用研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第9期3394-3397,3414,共5页 Application Research of Computers
基金 国家"863"计划资助项目(2011AA01A102) 国家科技支撑计划基金资助项目(2011BAH11B04)
关键词 多优先级 多通道并行传输 平均队长 平均等待时间 multi-priority concurrent muhipath transfer(CMT) average queue length average waiting time
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1JOE I,YAN Si-jia. SCTP throughput improvement with best load sharing based on multihoming [ C ] //Proc of the 5 th Intemationai Joint Conference on INC, IMS and IDC. [ S. 1. ] : IEEE Press,2009:138-142.
  • 2BUDZISZ L, FERRUS R, CASADEVALL F, et al. On concurrent multipath transfer in SCTP-based handover scenarios [ C ]//Proc of IEEE Intemationai Conference on Communications. 2009:1-6.
  • 3YUAN Yao, ZHANG Zi-di, LI Juan, et al. Extension of SCTP for concurrent multi-path transfer with parallel subflows [ C ]//Proc of Wireless Communications and Networking Conference. [ S. 1. ] : IEEE Press,2010:l-6.
  • 4STEWART R. RFC4960, Stream control transmission protocol [ S]. [S.l. ] :IETF, 2007. (下转第 3414 页).
  • 5IYENGAR J R, AMER P D,STEWART R. Concurrent multipath transfer using SCTP multihoming over independent end-to-end paths [J]. IEEE/ACM Trans on Networking,2006,14(5) :951-964.
  • 6ALAAE, SAADAWI T, LEE M. LS-SCTP; a bandwidth aggr-nation technique for stream control transmission protocol [J]. Computer Communications,2004,27(10) : 1012-1024.
  • 7YE Guan-hua, SAADAWI T N, LEE M. IPCC-SCTP: an enhancement to the standard SCTP to support multi-homing efficiently [ C ] // Proc of IEEE International Conference on Performance, Computing, and Communications. 2004 : 523-530.
  • 8HSIEH H Y,SIVAKUMAR R. A transport layer approach for achie-ving aggregate bandwidths on multi-homed mobile hosts [ J ]. WirelessNetworks,2005,11(1-2) :99-114.
  • 9杨冬,李世勇,王博,张宏科.支持普适服务的新一代网络传输层构架[J].计算机学报,2009,32(3):359-370. 被引量:10
  • 10OSOGAMI T, WIERMAN A’ HARCHOL B M, et al. A recursive analysis technique for multi-dimensionally infinite Markov chains [ J ]. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review,2004,32(2) :3-5.

二级参考文献21

  • 1林闯,彭雪海.可信网络研究[J].计算机学报,2005,28(5):751-758. 被引量:253
  • 2张宏科,苏伟.新网络体系基础研究——一体化网络与普适服务[J].电子学报,2007,35(4):593-598. 被引量:126
  • 3Stewart R et al. Stream control transmission protocol. RFC 2960, Internet Engineering Task Force, Oct. 2000.
  • 4Kohler E, Handley M, Floyd S. Designing DCCP: Congestion control without reliability//Proceedings of the SIG- COMM. Pisa, Italy, 2006.. 27-38.
  • 5Sivakumar H, Bailey S, Grossman R L. PSoekets: The case for application-level network striping for data intensive applications using high speed wide area networks//Proeeedings of the SC2000; High-performance network and computing conference. Dallas, TX, 2000: 38.
  • 6Eggert L, Heidemann J, Touch J. Effects of ensemble- TCP. ACM Computer Communication Review, 2000, 30 (1) : 15-29.
  • 7Balakrishnan H, Rahul H, Seshan S. An integrated congestion management architecture for Internet hosts//Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM. Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999: 175-187.
  • 8Allman M, Kruse H, Ostermann S. An application-level solution to TCP' s satellite inefficiencies//Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Satellite-based Information Services(WOSBIS). Ryel New York, 1996.
  • 9Baru C, Moore R, Rajasekar A, Wan M. The SDSC storage resource broker//Proeeedings of CASCON' 98. Toronto, Canada, 1998:5.
  • 10Floyd S. Congestion Control Principles. RFC 2914, IETF, September 2000.

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部