摘要
学界在提及洛特曼及其塔尔图符号学派的渊源关系时,往往会涉及该学派对俄国形式主义的继承,即对彼得堡诗歌语言研究会学术传统的延续。其实,洛特曼及其同事们几乎对俄国形式主义的全部核心观点都进行了批判,因此才能够在国际符号学界独树一帜。本文从内容与形式的融合、文化空间中的时间维度以及从封闭走向对话等三个方面,论述了洛特曼对俄国形式主义的批判和超越,同时也阐明了洛特曼与俄国形式主义在学术精神上的继承关系。
At the mention of Lotman and the historical origins of the Tartu School of Semiotics, the academia always talk about the inheritance of Russian Formalism by this school, that is, the continuing of the academic tradition of Society for Peterburg Poetry Language. In fact, Lotman, together with his colleagues, criticized almost all the key ideas of Russian Formalism. That's how they could advocate something unique in the international field of semiotics. This paper discusses not only Lotman's criticism and transcendence but also his academic inheritance of Russian Formalism from such aspects as the unity of form and content, temporal dimension of cultural space, and transformation from closeness to dialogue.
出处
《俄罗斯文艺》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第3期110-115,共6页
Russian Literature & Arts
基金
2011年度国家社科基金资助项目“20世纪俄苏文学批评理论史研究”(项目批准号11BWW001)的阶段性成果
“江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目”(优势学科代码20110101)的科研成果
“江苏省研究生创新研究计划”资助项目(项目批准号CXZZ11_0863)的阶段性成果
关键词
洛特曼
俄国形式主义
塔尔图符号学派
Iuri M. Lotman
Russian Formalism
Tartu School of Semiotics