期刊文献+

膜生物反应器与粉末活性炭-膜生物反应器除污染特性对比研究 被引量:3

COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR AND POWDERED ACTIVATED CARBON-MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用膜生物反应器(MBR)和粉末活性炭-膜生物反应器(PAC-MBR)两种工艺处理微污染原水,考察了两阶段进水情况下的除污染效能及初始有机物和氨氮质量浓度对各工艺除污染特性的影响。结果表明,进水有机物含量对MBR和PAC-MBR除污染的效果有较大的影响,当CODMn由(3.67±0.11)mg/L增加至(4.11±0.23)mg/L时,两种工艺对CODMn的去除率分别由(23.1±9.8)%和(37.6±5.5)%增加至(35.4±12.6)%和(43.1±17.0)%。两个阶段各工艺出水的NH3-N质量浓度均小于0.4 mg/L,且系统连续运行过程中出水的NO2--N质量浓度分别低至(7.5±5.8)μg/L和(6.1±3.6)μg/L,显著低于原水中的平均值(76.9±7.6)μg/L。同时发现PAC-MBR工艺中PAC延长了微生物与有机物的接触时间,并为微生物生长提供了载体,可有效提高细菌的总耗氧速率(SOUR),并使生物处理系统中的有机物浓度的临界值降低,从而有效提高整个生物处理系统中有机物和氨氮的去除率。 Membrane bioreactor(MBR) and powdered activated carbon-membrane bioreactor (PAC-MBR) systems were used for treating micro-polluted raw water, and a two-stage study was conducted to systematically investigate the performance of the two systems and the effects of influent organic content and, initial concentration of ammoniaon on it. The study showed that with the regular influent concentrations of CODMn increasing from (3.67±0.11) mg/L to (4.11±0.23) mg/L, CODMn removal increased from (23.1 ±9.8)% and (37.6±5.5)% to (35.4±12.6)% and (43.1±17.0)% from MBR and PAC-MBR systems, respectively. The effluent concentrations 0f NH3-N at two stages were less than 0.4 mg/L, and MBR and PAC-MBR normally had a NO2-N of (7.5±5.8)μg/L and (6.1±3.6)μg/L, respectively, significantly lower than the average of the raw water. In the PAC-MBR process, PAC extended the contact time of organics and ammonia and provided a carrier for microbial growth, then increased the oxygen uptake rate for the total bacteria and reduced the critical value for influent organic content, therefore effectively improved the removal of organics and ammonia.
出处 《水处理技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第9期67-70,74,共5页 Technology of Water Treatment
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51178323 51108329)
关键词 膜生物反应器 微污染原水 粉末活性炭 有机物 氨氮 membrane bioreactor micro-polluted raw water powdered activated carbon organics ammonia
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1XJ Gai,HS Kim.The role of powdered activated carbon in enhancing the performance of membrane systems for water treatment [J] , Desalination,2008,225(1-3):288-300.
  • 2G Seo, S Takizawa, S Ohgaki. Ammonia oxidation at low temperature in a high concentration powdered activated carbon membrane bioreactor [J] .Water Science and Technology:Water Supply,2002: 169-176.
  • 3SS Adham, VL Snoeyink, MM Clark, et al. Predicting and verifying organics removal by pac in an ultrafiltration system [J] Journal American Water Works Association, 1991,83(12):81-91.
  • 4X Li, FI Hai, LD Nghiem.Simultaneous activated carbon adsorption within a membrane bioreactor for an enhanced micropollutant removal[J] .Bioresource Technology,2010.
  • 5W Gao, H Liang, J Ma, et al. Membrane fouling control in ultrafiltration technology for drinking water production: a review [J].Desalination,2011,272(1-3): 1-8.
  • 6O Sagbo, Y Sun, A Hao, et al. Effect of pac addition on mbr process for drinking water treatment [J].Separation and Purification Technology,2008,58(3):320-327.
  • 7W Guo, S Vigneswaran, HH Ngo, et al. Comparison of the performance of submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) and submerged membrane adsorption bioreactor (SMABR) [J]. Bioresource Technology,2008,99(5): 1012-1017.
  • 8J Tian, H Liang, Y Yang, et al. Membrane adsorption bioreactor (MABR) for treating slightly polluted surface water supplies: as compared to membrane bioreactor (MBR) [J] .Journal of Membrane Science,2008,325(1):262-270.
  • 9中国国家环境保护总局.水和废水监测分析方法[M].4版.北京: 中国环境科学出版社,2002.
  • 10J Surmacz-Gorska, K Gemaey, C Demuynck, et al. Nitrification monitoring in activated sludge by oxygen uptake rate (OUR) measurements!; J] .Water research, 1996,30(5): 1228-1236.

二级参考文献30

  • 1刘双江,刘志培,王保军,杨惠芳,李永秋,俞毓馨,王占生.水源水生物预处理反应器微生物学特征[J].城市环境与城市生态,1994,7(2):1-5. 被引量:4
  • 2王毓仁.提高废水生物硝化效果的理论探讨及工艺对策[J].给水排水,1994,20(8):25-28. 被引量:19
  • 3朱南文,闵航,陈美慈,赵宇华.TTC─脱氢酶测定方法的探讨[J].中国沼气,1996,14(2):3-5. 被引量:95
  • 4周春生,尹军.TTC-脱氢酶活性检测方法的研究[J].环境科学学报,1996,16(4):400-405. 被引量:99
  • 5国家环保局水和废水分析监测方法编委会.水和废水分析监测方法[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1989..
  • 6Lazarova V. , Manem J. Biofilm characteristics and activity analysis in water and wastewater treatment. Wat. Res.,1995,29(10) :2227 - 2245.
  • 7Cristina Fonseca A. , Scott Summers R. , Mark T. Hernandez. Comparative measurement of microbial activity in drinking water biofihers. Wat. Res. ,2001,35 ( 16 ) : 3817 -3824.
  • 8Robie J. Vestal, David C. White. Lipid analysis in microbial ecology. Bio. Science ,1989,39 ( 8 ) :535 - 541.
  • 9Robert H. Findlay, Gary M. King, Les Watling. Efficacy of phospholipid analysis in determining microbial biomass in sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. , 1989,55 ( 11 ) : 2888- 2893.
  • 10Reasoner D. J. , Geldreich E. E. A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water.Appl. Environ. Microbio1,1985, 49 ( 1 ) : 1 - 7.

共引文献71

同被引文献60

引证文献3

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部