期刊文献+

汽车共享对城市温室气体排放的影响 被引量:18

Urban Greenhouse Gas Emission of Car Sharing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来我国居民出行的机动化需求越来越高,而严峻的能源环境挑战使得我们不能按照发达国家的千人小汽车拥有水平来发展机动化。汽车共享是一种新兴的绿色机动化服务模式,既可满足成员的机动化出行需求又可降低私人小汽车保有量和出行量,并会因此减少车辆使用产生的温室气体排放。在上海浦东联洋社区、虹口山阴路社区和天山虹桥社区进行居民问卷调查,统计分析结果表明:拥有车辆数多的家庭加入汽车共享的意愿略低于无车家庭,在被调查者中仅有10%左右的人愿意因为汽车共享放弃现有车辆。当通勤距离超过8 000 m时,被调查者对汽车共享的需求下降,而达到14 000 m以后,对汽车共享的需求会再次上升。当汽车共享的出行费用分别为20元/h,25元/h和30元/h时,日常采购出行加入汽车共享的意愿分别为75.28%,60.89%和36.54%;机场出行加入汽车共享的意愿分别为79.34%,67.16%和46.86%;休闲出行加入汽车共享的意愿分别为85.24%,65.69%和44.28%。计算271份样本的汽车共享效应,得到汽车行驶里程年折减量为228 520 km,费用折减每年1 465 185元,CO2排放年折减61 035 kg。因此,在我国城市中积极引入汽车共享这种环境友好的用车服务,可以解决一部分居民的机动化需求,由此产生的潜在效应对减少城市温室气体排放有显著意义。 In recent years, the motorized travel demand increased greatly in China, but the severe energy and environment situation limited that we cannot take the level of vehicle ownership per thousand people in developed country as our goal of motorization development. Car sharing is an emerging green mode of motorized travel service, which can meet the motorized travel needs of its members as well as reduce the private car ownership and motorized trips, thus reduce the Green House Gas emission generated by vehicle using. The statistical result of community survey in Shanghai, which includes Lianyang Community in Pudong, Shanyin Road Community in Hongkou and Hongqiao Community in Tianshan, shows that the household with more vehicles has a slightly lower will to join the car sharing service than the no-vehicle household; only 10% of respondents would get rid of their existing vehicles if they join the car sharing service. The will of joining car sharing is getting lower when respondents' commute distance is further than 8 000 m, but will get higher when the commute distance is further than 14 000 m. When the travel cost of car sharing is RMB 20/h, RMB 25/h and RMB 30/h, the corresponding car sharing joining will is 75.28%, 60.89% and 36.54% for grocery shopping travel, 79.34%, 67. 16% and 46.86% for airport travel, 85.24% , 65.69% and 44.28% for vocational travel. The 271 respondents' car sharing effect are 228 520 km reduction in vehicle travel distance per year, RMB 1 465 185 /year reduction in travel cost and 61 035 kg/year reduction in CO2 emission. Therefore, introducing the environment friendly car sharing service can resolve a part of citizens' motorized trip demand and these potential effects are significantly important to the reduction of urban Green House Gas emission.
出处 《中国人口·资源与环境》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第9期48-53,共6页 China Population,Resources and Environment
基金 国家科技支撑"十二五"课题"城镇低碳建设规划关键技术研究与示范"(编号:2011BAJ07B01)
关键词 汽车共享 温室气体排放 机动化出行 car sharing Green House Gas (GHG) emission motorized trip
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1国家统计局.2010年中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社.2010.
  • 2Davis S C, Diegel S W. Transportation Energy Data Book, Edition 30 [ R]. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Center for Transportation Analysis ,2011.
  • 3黄肇义,杨东援.国外小汽车共用的发展状况[J].城市规划汇刊,2000(6):50-55. 被引量:23
  • 4黄肇义.国内城市交通发展“汽车共用”的探讨[J].城市交通,2004,2(3):52-55. 被引量:7
  • 5Martin E W, Shaheen S A. Greenhouse Gas Emission Impacts of Carsharing in North America [ J]. Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2011, 12(4) : 1074 - 1086.
  • 6Shaheen S A, Sperling D, Wagner C. Carsharing in Europe and North America: Past, Present, and Future [ J ]. Transportation Quarterly, 1998,52(3) :3 -4.
  • 7Shaheen S A, Cohen A P, Chung M S. North American Carsharing: 10 Year Retrospective [ C ]. Washington D C: Transportation Research Record, 2009:35 - 44.
  • 8Cervero R. City CarShare: First-Year Travel Demand Impacts [ J]. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2003, 1839:159 - 166.
  • 9Cervero R, Tsai Y. City Carshare in San Francisco, California: Second-Year Travel Demand and Car Ownership Impacts[J]. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2004,1887 : 117 - 127.
  • 10Cervero R, Golub A, Nee B. City Carshare : Longer-Term Travel Demand and Car Ownership Impacts [ J ]. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007,1992:70 - 80.

二级参考文献15

  • 1[13]The National Station Car Association, Transit Oriented Development, Parking, and Station Cars: The Whole is reater than the Old Sum. http: //www. stncar, com/tM, html.
  • 2[1]Pretteuthaler F. E. and Steininger K. W. (1999), From ownership to service use lifestyle: the potential of car sharing, Ecological Enonomics,Vol. 28, pp443-453.
  • 3[2]Conrad Wagner and Richard Katzev, Car Sharing Takes off in Enmpe. Urban Ecologist, 1996, No. 3.
  • 4[3]Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Energy 2000 Motor fuels section/Mobility. CarSharing—the key to combined mobility.
  • 5[4]The National Station Car Association, Station Car vs. Car Sharing: What's the Difference? http: //www. stncar, com/shared, html
  • 6[5]Fellows N. T. and Pitfield D. E. (2000), An economic and operational evaluation of urban car-sharing. Transportion Research Part D, Vol. 5, pp1-10.
  • 7[6]Car Sharing, http: //www. carsharing, net.
  • 8[7]Elizabeth Sullivan, City Carshare: Providing Automobiles Without Encouraging Over-Use. Essay of San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association. http: //www. spur. org/carshare, html.
  • 9[8]The National Station Car Association (1999), The Station Car Concept.
  • 10[9]The National Station Car Association (1999), 1999 Annual Report of the Executive Director.

共引文献31

同被引文献129

引证文献18

二级引证文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部