期刊文献+

水底隧道衬砌水压力折减系数估算 被引量:11

Calculation of Reduction Coefficient of Water Pressure on Underwater Tunnel Lining
下载PDF
导出
摘要 水底隧道衬砌水压力是衬砌结构设计的关键参数之一,根据对衬砌水压力作用机制的探讨,"全堵型"隧道衬砌承担全部静水压力,而对于"排水型"隧道,衬砌只承受部分水压力,作用在衬砌上的水压力应该进行折减。根据渗流理论,推导了轴对称条件下衬砌水压力折减系数的理论公式及利用隧道衬砌前与衬砌后涌水量的反分析简化公式,并通过数值方法验证了其可靠性。计算结果表明:1)隧道涌水量随着衬砌渗透系数的减小而减少,当kl/ks=0.001时,涌水量几乎为0,而水压力折减系数近似等于1;2)对于不同的kl/ks值,水压力折减系数与涌水量存在一个公共点,这个交点范围为kl/ks=(0.02~0.03),对应的水压力折减系数约为0.5;3)对围岩进行注浆可以有效减少涌水量,但仍会有较大的水压力作用在注浆圈上,对注浆圈的长期耐久性提出了较高的要求;4)利用隧道衬砌前后涌水量推导的衬砌水压力折减系数反分析公式,其计算结果可靠、有效,可以在以后隧道结构设计中应用。 The water pressure on the tunnel lining is one of the key parameters of tunnel structure design. The water prooftype lining bears hydrostatic pressure. However, the drainagetype lining usually partially responds to the hydro static pressure. The hydrostatic pressure exerted on the lining should be reduced. The water pressure reduction coeffi cient of the lining under the conditions of axial symmetry is deduced, and its reliability is verified by means of numerical method, on basis of waterseepage theory. The calculation results show : 1 ) The water inflow decreases as the lining per meability reduces. When the value of kl/k,is 0. 001, there is almost no water inflow and the water pressure reduction coefficient is nearly equal to 1. 2) There is a public intersection between the water inflow and the water pressure reduc tion coefficient for different values of kl/k, and the range of kl/k is from 0.02 to 0.03, meanwhile, the water pressure reduction coefficient is about 0.5. 3 ) The water inflow can be effectively stopped by means of grouting. 4) The calcula tion results are reliable and effective.
出处 《隧道建设》 2012年第4期474-478,494,共6页 Tunnel Construction
基金 中国中铁股份有限公司科技开发计划课题(重点-40-2011)
关键词 水底隧道 衬砌 水压力 涌水量 折减系数 underwater tunnel tunnel lining water pressure water inflow reduction coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献29

  • 1蒋忠信.u值较大时泰斯公式的直线解析法[J].水文地质工程地质,1982,(2):28-33.
  • 2张宏仁.泰斯公式几个有趣的推论[J].水文地质工程地质,1985,(5):26-28.
  • 3张有天 张武功.隧洞水荷载的静力计算[J].水利学报,1980,(3):52-62.
  • 4朱大力 李秋枫.日本开发出预测隧道涌水量的非稳定流法[J].铁路地质与路基,1994,(2):29-30.
  • 5小库珀H H,雅各布C E. 评价地层参数和概括井区历史的通用图解法[A]. 见:张宏仁编. 地下水非稳定流理论的发展和应用[C]. 北京:地质出版社,1975.(Cuber H H,Jacob C E. A Current Analytical Method to Evaluating Stratum Parameter and Generalizing History of Well Field[A]. In:Zhang Hongren ed. Development and Application of Underground Water Non-stable Flow Theory[C]. Beijing:Geological Press,1975.(in Chinese))
  • 6卢时望.裘布依R解析法探讨[J].水文地质工程地质,1985,(6):48-50.
  • 7婉愉.泰斯公式的有关理论和实践[J].水文地质工程地质,1985,(3):22-24.
  • 8Bobet A. Effect of pore water pressure on tunnel support during static and seismic loading[J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology,2003,(6):13-16.
  • 9Dahlo T,Evans K F,Halvorsen A,et al. Adverse effects of pore-pressure drainage on stress measurements performed in deep tunnel:an example from the Lower Kihansi hydroelectric power project of Tanzania[J]. International Journal of Rock and Mining Sciences,2003,(40):65-93.
  • 10Jorge Molinero,Javier Samper,Ruben Juanes. Numerical modeling of the transient hydrogeological response produced by tunnel construction in fractured bedrocks[J]. Engineering Geology,2002,(64):369-386.

共引文献160

同被引文献106

引证文献11

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部