期刊文献+

物种受威胁状况评估:研究进展与中国的案例 被引量:25

Assessing species endangerment status:progress in research and an example from China
原文传递
导出
摘要 评估物种濒危等级,确定物种保护优先序,是生物多样性保护的一项重要工作。通过不断的修订,IUCN红色名录濒危等级标准已经趋于完善。但是,目前人们还在探索在无法获得物种的种群数量、生境、生活史数据时,如何寻找替代指标评估物种濒危等级。我们综述了国内外物种濒危状况研究的进展,提出了结合物种分布区、生活史、生态功能、人为干扰和特殊利用价值的评估物种受威胁状况的方法,并以此方法评估了中国陆生脊椎动物的生存状况。结果表明,列入灭绝级的物种有5个,功能性灭绝级的物种有30个,濒危级的物种有343个,受胁级的物种有459个,关注级的物种有439个,无危级的物种有1,032个。 It is an important task in biodiversity conservation to assess species endangerment status and ae- termine protection priorities. Although IUCN Redlist Criteria are improving through periodical revision, people are still developing different criteria because information about population census, habitat status and life history of a given species are often lacking. We reviewed the progress of assessing species endangerment status, both internationally and domestically, and propose that future designations combine distribution area, life history, ecological function, anthropogenic interference and special use data to more accurately assess endangerment status. As an example, we assessed the status of terrestrial vertebrates in China using this method. Our results showed that five species were listed in the category of extinct, 30 species were extinct, 343 species were endangered, 459 species were threatened, 439 species were concemed, and 1,032 species were least concerned.
出处 《生物多样性》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期612-622,共11页 Biodiversity Science
基金 国家环保部项目"中国陆生脊椎动物受威胁状况评估" "中国西南喀斯特地区野生动物资源重点调查"和"濒危动物评估标准及红色名录编制" 中国科学院知识创新工程项目(KSCX2-EW-Z-4)
关键词 物种濒危等级标准 灭绝 濒危物种 受威胁物种 哺乳类 鸟类 爬行类 两栖类 Criteria for assessing species endangerment status, extinction, endangered species, threatenedspecies, mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Zheng GM (郑光美), Wang QS (王岐山).(1998) China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals – Aves (中国濒危动物红皮书-鸟类). Science Press, Beijing.
  • 2Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR (2002) Mammal population losses and the extinction crisis. Science, 296, 904–907.
  • 3Nelson K, Sulivan TA (1993) New criteria for listing species in the CITES appendices. Species, 20, 15–17.
  • 4SEMARNAT (Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales).(2002) Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059– SEMARNAT-2001, Protección ambiental, especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres, categorías de riesgoy especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio, lista de especies en riesgo. Diario Oficial de la Federación,6, 95–190.
  • 5Jiang ZG (蒋志刚), Ma KP (马克平), Han XG (韩兴国).(1997) Conservation Biology (保护生物学). Zhejiang Science and Technology Publishing house, Hangzhou.
  • 6Wang S (汪松), Xie Y (解焱).(2004) China Species Red List, Vol. I Red List (中国物种红色名录,第一卷 红色名录). Higher Education Press, Beijing.
  • 7Luo ZH, Tang S,H Li CW, Chen J, Fang HX, Jiang ZG (2011) Do Rapoport’s rule, mid-domain effect or environmental factors predict latitudinal range size patterns of terrestrial mammals in China? PLoS ONE, 6, e27975.
  • 8Yue PQ (乐佩琦), Chen YY (陈宜瑜).(1998) China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals: Fishes (中国濒危动物红皮书: 鱼类). Science Press, Beijing.
  • 9蒋志刚.野生动植物的经济绝灭与贸易管制——生物学研究与自然保护法律、政策的制订[J].世界科技研究与发展,2001,23(1):28-32. 被引量:9
  • 10蒋志刚,樊恩源.关于物种濒危等级标准之探讨——对IUCN物种濒危等级的思考[J].生物多样性,2003,11(5):383-392. 被引量:27

二级参考文献46

共引文献66

同被引文献403

引证文献25

二级引证文献204

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部