期刊文献+

知识视角的组织:概念、边界及研究主题 被引量:8

Knowledge-based organization studies:concepts,boundaries and research topics
原文传递
导出
摘要 从知识的视角来研究组织是20世纪末以来管理学研究的前沿领域之一,但由于目前学术界及实践中对知识视角组织的理解尚不统一,影响了对组织概念、组织边界及研究主题的系统深入分析研究。针对这些缺陷,本文在对知识视角组织的相关研究文献进行梳理的基础上,明确界定了知识与组织的概念,分析了组织边界的确定,并立足于企业发展层面对知识视角的组织研究主题进行了讨论,结合组织前沿思想探索了该领域研究的发展趋势,旨在对知识视角的组织未来研究提供有益的参考和启示。 To research organization from the knowledge perspective is one of the leading edge of the management research field since the end of last century, but until now scholars have not yet reached an agreement on the understanding of knowledge - based organiza- tion in academic community and practice, which systematically affects research on organization concepts, organization boundaries and research topics in - depth analysis. For these shortcomings, the paper makes a clear definition of the concept of knowledge and organi- zation on the basis of thorough analysis, analyzes the determination of the organization boundary, discusses the knowledge - based or- ganization research topics on enterprise development level, explores the study trends in this field with organization frontier thought, all these aims to provide helpful reference and enlightenment for knowledge - based organization' s future research.
作者 屠兴勇
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第9期1378-1387,共10页 Studies in Science of Science
关键词 知识 组织 组织边界 研究主题 knowledge organization organization boundaries research topics
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1John Seely Brown, Paul Duguid. Knowledge and organi- zation : a social - practice perspective [ J ]. Organization Science, 2001 , 12(2) :198 -213.
  • 2Ikujiro Nonaka. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation[ J]. Organization Science, 1994, 5 (1):14-37.
  • 3Baiyin Yang. Toward a holistic theory of knowledge and adult learning[ J]. Human Resource Development Re- view, 2003, 2(2):114- 120.
  • 4Drucker P F. The coming of new organizations [ J ]. Harvard Business Review, 1988, 1(2) :45 -55.
  • 5Hill C W, Matusik S F. The utilization of contingent work, knowledge creation, and competitive advantage [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(4): 680 - 697.
  • 6Claudia Bird Schoonhoven. Evolution of the special is- sue on knowledge, knowing, and organizations[ J]. Or-ganization Science, 2002, 13 (3) :223.
  • 7Fiss P C. Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set ap- proach to typologies in organization research[ J]. Acade- my of Management Journal, 2011, 54(2):393-420.
  • 8Martin Kilduff, Ajay Mehra, Mary B. Dunn. From blue sky research to problem Ssolving: a philosophy of sci- ence theory of new knowledge production [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 2011, 36 ( 2 ) :297 - 317.
  • 9Grant R M. Toward a knowledge -based theory of the firm[ J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17 : 109 - 122.
  • 10Stephen Tallman, Mark Jenkins, Nick Henry, Steven Pinch. Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage [ J]. Academy of Management Review, 2004, 29 (2) , 258 - 271.

二级参考文献41

  • 1曾宪聚,席酉民,杨百寅.组织协作秩序的扩展及其知识逻辑——和谐管理理论的视角[J].管理学家(学术版),2008(3):207-226. 被引量:10
  • 2Baiyin Yang, Toward a Holistic Theory of Knowledge and Adult Learning, Human Resource Development Review, 2003, 2 (2), pp. 107-128.
  • 3Jerry W. Gilley, Organizational Learning, Performance, and Change: An Introduction to Strategic Human Resource De- velopment, Cambridge, MA: Perseus, 2000.
  • 4Ikujirli Nonaka, The Knowledge Creating Company, Harvard Business Review, 1991, 69(6), pp. 95 -103.
  • 5Axel Honneth, Charles W. Wright, The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy, edi ted by Charles W. Wrighe, Albany, NY: State University of New York, 1995.
  • 6哈贝马斯.《认识与兴趣》,李黎、郭官义译,上海:学林出版社,1999年,第55页.
  • 7Juergen Haberams, Legitimation Crisis, trans, by Thomas McCarthy, Boston : Beacon Press, 1975.
  • 8约翰·斯图亚特·密尔.《功用主义》,唐钺译,北京:商务印书馆,1957年,第10页.
  • 9Alexander Styhre, Per-Erik Josephson and Ingeborg Knauseder, Or-ganization Learning in Non-writing Communities: The Case of Construction Worker, Management Learning, 2006, 37 (1), pp. 84-85.
  • 10Juergen Haberams, Religion in the Public Sphere, European Joumal of Philosophy, 2006, 14( 1 ), p. 4.

共引文献20

同被引文献148

引证文献8

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部