摘要
《左傳·定公四年》所載祝佗關於周成王分封過程的一段追敍,在商代宗族結構的研究史上居於重要地位,但其中存在的許多矛盾,難以在現存古史框架内獲得圓滿解釋。在與殷民六族、殷民七族相關文字的周圍,很可能存在一些被有意植入正文的注文。分魯公之殷民六族,分康叔之殷民七族,分唐叔之懷姓九宗,都是追敍原文中所謂"昭之以分物"的具體類目之一;"使帥其宗氏"中的被"使"者,應該是魯公。祝佗在使用"宗氏"等詞時並非針對"殷民六族"而言。
Zhutuo's recollection of the process of subinfeudation during the reign of Zhouchengwang, which was recorded in Zuozhuan, took a key role in the academic history of the study on lineage structure in Shang dynasty. But there were a lot of contradictions in this piece of record, which cannot be explained well in the frame of ancient history. Probably some notes were intentionally added into the text. 'To Lugong with the six clans of the people of Yin,' 'to Kangshu with the seven clans of the people of Yin,' and 'to Tangshu with nine clans of the surname Huai' were the specific contents of subinfeudation. 'The chief of kindred,' as a concept used by Zhutuo, was not related with 'the six clans of the people of Yin.'
出处
《中华文史论丛》
CSSCI
2012年第3期1-42,共42页
Journal of Chinese Literature and History
基金
上海市普通高校人文社會科學重點研究基地上海師範大學中國近代社會研究中心(SJ0703)規劃項目
