期刊文献+

不当督导对管理效能的影响及其作用机制

Impact and Mechanism of Managers' Abusive Supervision on Management Efficacy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 探讨领导-成员交换(LMX)和公平知觉在管理者不当督导与管理效能之间的内在作用机制。采用问卷法,以深圳市企事业单位员工为被试,并通过SPSS15.0进行数据分析。结果显示,(1)不当督导同管理效能之间存在负向相关关系;(2)LMX在不当督导与管理效能之间具有中介作用;(3)公平知觉在不当督导与管理效能之间发挥调节作用。并说明研究局限及未来方向。 Research on the impact of abusive supervision on organizational behavior also continues to deepen. The paper aims at investigating the intrinsic mechanism of leader - member exchange (LMX) and justice perception between abusive supervision and management efficacy. The survey is conducted by questionnaires to test employees from enterprises in Shenzhen and the data is analyzed through SPSS 15. 0. The conclusions are as follows : ( 1 ) Abusive supervision is negatively related to management efficacy. (2) LMX plays a mediating role between abusive supervision and management efficacy. (3) Justice perception functions as a moderating variable between abusive supervision and management efficacy. Limitations and future research directions are also discussed in the paper .
机构地区 深圳大学
出处 《科技管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第18期248-253,共6页 Science and Technology Management Research
关键词 人力资源管理 不当督导对管理效能作用机制 问卷调查 公平知觉 领导-成员交换 human resource management mechanism of abusive supervision on management efficacy questionnaire survey LMX justice perception
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1李锐,凌文辁,柳士顺.上司不当督导对下属建言行为的影响及其作用机制[J].心理学报,2009,41(12):1189-1202. 被引量:111
  • 2TEPPER B J. Consequences of abusive supervision [ J]. The Acade- my of Management Journal, 2000, 43 (2) : 178 - 190.
  • 3吴宗佑.由不当督导到情绪枯竭:部署公平知觉与情绪劳动的中介效果[J].中华心理学刊,2008:201-221.
  • 4ZELLARS K L, TEPPER B J, DUFFY M K. Abusive supervision and subordinates" organizational citizenship behavior [ J ]. Journal of Ap- plied Psychology, 2002, 87 (6): 1068-1076.
  • 5HARRIS K J, KACMAR K M, ZIVNUSKA S. Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda [ J ]. Journal of Management, 2007, 33 (3): 261 -289.
  • 6赵瑞美.人力资源管理效能研究述评[J].科技管理研究,2009,29(10):433-437. 被引量:13
  • 7易兵.LMX理论在中国文化环境下的应用研究[D].北京:对外经济贸易大学国际商学院,2006.
  • 8龙立荣,刘亚.组织不公正及其效果研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(4):584-593. 被引量:60
  • 9ARYEE S, CHEN Z X, SUN L Y, et al. Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision : Test of a trickle - down model [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007 (92) : 191 -201.
  • 10任孝鹏,王辉.领导-部属交换(LMX)的回顾与展望[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(6):788-797. 被引量:72

二级参考文献171

  • 1龙立荣,刘亚.组织不公正及其效果研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(4):584-593. 被引量:60
  • 2温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7630
  • 3凌文辁,杨海军,方俐洛.企业员工的组织支持感[J].心理学报,2006,38(2):281-287. 被引量:396
  • 4段锦云,王重鸣,钟建安.大五和组织公平感对进谏行为的影响研究[J].心理科学,2007,30(1):19-22. 被引量:84
  • 5吴宗佑.由不当督导到情绪枯竭:部署正义知觉与情绪劳动的中介效果[J].中华心理学刊,2008,50:201-221.
  • 6Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 191-201.
  • 7Aryee, S., Sun, L. Y., Chen, Z. X., & Debrah, Y. A. (2008). Abusive supervision and contextual performance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure. Management and Organization Review, 4, 393-411.
  • 8Bamberger, P. A., & Bacharach, S. B. (2006). Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress, and subordinate personality into account. Human Relations, 59, 1-30.
  • 9Burton, J. P., & Hoobler, J. M. (2006). Subordinate self-esteem and abusive supervision. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18, 340-353.
  • 10Dupre, K. E., Irmess, M., Connelly, C. E., Barling, J., & Hoption, C. (2006). Workplace aggression in teenage part-time employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91,987-997.

共引文献3392

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部