期刊文献+

爆炸作用下拱形结构反射系数计算方法研究 被引量:8

STUDY OF REFLECTIVE COEFFICEIENTS OF UNDERGROUND PROTECHIVE ARCHES UNDER BLAST LOADS
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了计算爆炸荷载作用下地下拱形结构上的动荷载,引入了Costantino荷载模型考虑拱结构拱曲率对介质-结构相互作用机理的影响,在单自由度体系位移模式的基础上利用虚功原理,求解爆炸荷载作用下拱形结构的反射系数,即作用到结构上的均布动荷载峰值与结构板块处自由场应力的均布峰值之比。讨论了拱曲率、结构刚度、介质参数对反射系数的影响。在此基础上,与规范中平顶结构的综合反射系数计算方法进行了比较,引入修正系数对公式进行修正,改进后的反射系数计算方法对于不同的结构形式具有更广泛的适用性。 To explore the blast loading acted on the underground protective arches, the Costantino model (MM) is introduced to consider the structure-medium interaction (SMI), in which the radius effect to the dynamic interaction is included. The displacement mode of the arch is assumed based on the equivalent single degree of freedom method, and the dynamic interaction equation of the structure is set up by the virtual work principle. The reflective coefficients are calculated by the ratio of the average peak stress of the dynamic loads to that of the free stresses. Influences of arch radius, structure stiffness, and medium modulus are discussed. Traditional reflective coefficient method is then modified by introducing new parameters to extend its applications to much more structure styles.
出处 《工程力学》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第9期278-283,共6页 Engineering Mechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金创新研究群体科学基金项目(51021001) 国家自然科学基金项目(51078351) 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部实验室(河海大学)开放基金项目(GH200905) 爆炸科学与技术国家重点实验室开放基金项目(KFJJ10-16) 抗震工程技术四川省重点实验室(西南交通大学)开放基金项目
关键词 爆炸荷载 地下拱形结构 岩土-介质相互作用 反射系数 Constantino模型 blast loads underground protective arches structure-medium interaction (SMI) reflective coefficient (RE) Constantino model
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Krauthammer T, Puglisi R D. Simplified analysis ofburied reinforced concrete arches under simulatednuclear loads [J]. Computers & Structures, 1992, 43:1029-1039.
  • 2Stevens D J, Krauthammer T. Analysis of blast-loaded,buried arch response. Part I: numerical approach [J].ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 1991, 117:197-211.
  • 3Stevens D J, Krauthammer T, Chandra D. Analysis ofblast-loaded, buried arch response. Part II: application [J].ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 1991, 117:213-234.
  • 4Dharaneepathy M V, Kewava Rao M N, Santhakumar AR. The influence of geometry on the blast response ofcircular arches [J]. Computers & Structures, 1992, 45:755-763.
  • 5Ma G W, Zhou H Y, Lu Y, et al. In-structure shock ofunderground structures: A theoretical approach [J].Engineering Structures, 2010, 32: 3836-3844.
  • 6Miller C A, Costantino C J. Structure-foundationinteraction of a nuclear power plant with a seismicdisturbance [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1970,14: 332-342.
  • 7Costantino C J, Vey E. Response of buried cylindersencased in foam [J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics andFoundation Division, 1969, 95(5): 1159-1180.
  • 8US army engineers waterways experimental station.Fundamentals of protective design for conventionalweapons [J]. TM5-855-1, Vicksburg, 1986.
  • 9Departments of the army, the navy and the air force.Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions[D]. TM5-1300, Washington, DC, 1990.
  • 10Smith P D, Hetherington J G. Blast and ballistic loadingof structures [M]. London: Butterworth-Heinemann,1994.

同被引文献146

引证文献8

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部