期刊文献+

食管胃交界部腺癌与胸下段食管鳞癌外科治疗结果的比较分析 被引量:6

Comparison of outcomes after surgery between adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较食管胃交界部腺癌(AEG)与胸下段食管鳞癌(LESC)生物学行为和临床特点.探索各自合理的手术方式。方法回顾性分析2004年1月至2012年4月间上海交通大学附属胸科医院收治的111例AEG和126例LESC患者的临床资料.比较两组病例手术切除率、淋巴结转移情况及术后并发症发生率的差异。结果AEG组和LESC组患者的手术切除率分别为94.6%(105/111)和97.6%(123/126),差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。AEG组患者纵隔淋巴结转移率明显低于LESC组f6.3%(7/111)比32.5%(41/126),P〈0.011,腹腔淋巴结转移率则明显高于LESC组[57.7%(64/111)比34.1%(43/126),P〈0.01]。SiewertⅠ型和SiewertⅡ型AEG纵隔淋巴结转移率分别为12.5%(4/32)和4.7%(3/64).而15例siewertⅢ型AEG患者则未发现纵隔淋巴结转移。AEG单纯经腹手术者,中下纵隔淋巴结转移检出率显著低于经胸手术者[0/22比7.9%(7/89),P〈0.05]:LESC经右胸行二野或三野淋巴结清扫者,上纵隔淋巴结转移检出率明显高于经左胸单一切口者[17.9%(12/67)比0/59,P〈0.01]。两组患者术后并发症发生率分别为23.4%(26/111)和27.0%(34/126)。差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论AEG和LESC具有不同淋巴结转移规律,应采用不同的手术方式进行治疗。SiewertⅠ型和Ⅱ型AEG需重视中下纵隔淋巴结的清扫。 Objective To compare the differences in biological behavior and clinical features between adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction(AEG) and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell cancer (LESC), and to explore reasonable procedures for each cancer. Methods Clinical data of Ⅲ patients with AEG and 126 patients with LESC who underwent surgery from January 2004 to April 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Data pertaining to resection rate, lymph node metastasis, and postoperative complication rate were analyzed. Results The resection rate was 94.6% for AEG and 97.6% for LESC, and the difference was not statistically significant (P〈O.05). The rate of lymph node metastasis in the mediastinum in patients with AEG was significantly lower E6.3% (7/111) vs. 32.5% (41/126), P〈0.01], while the rate of lymph node metastasis in the abdomen was significantly higher [ 57.7% (64/111 ) vs. 34.1% (43/126), P〈O.O1 ]. The rate of lymph node metastasis in mediastinum of AEG was 12.5%(4/32) for Siewert I and 4.7%(3/64) for Siewert Ⅱ , and there was no lymph node metastasis in SiewertⅢ (n=15). For AEG patients who underwent trans-abdominal surgery, the rate of positive lymph node in the middle and lower mediastinum was significantly lower than trans-thoracic surgery [0/22 vs. 7.9% (7/89), P〈0.05]. LESC via right thorax with two-field or three-field lymph node dissection was associated with a significantly higher rate of positive lymph node metastasis in the upper mediastinum than that of single incision via left thorax [ 17.9%(12/67) vs. 0/59, P〈0.01 ]. The postoperative complication rates were 23.4% (26/111) and 27.0% (34/126) respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (P〉0.05). Conclusions AEG and LESC show different lymph node metastasis pattern and should be operated differently. Lymphadenectomy in mid-lower mediastinum should be emphasized in Siewert Ⅰ and Siewert Ⅱ type cancers.
出处 《中华胃肠外科杂志》 CAS 2012年第9期893-896,共4页 Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
关键词 食管胃交界部腺癌 胸下段食管鳞癌 外科手术 淋巴结转移 淋巴结清扫 Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction Lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell Surgical procedures Lymph node metastasis Lymph node dissection
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg, 1998,85 (11):1457- 1459.
  • 2Hasegawa S, Yoshikawa T. Adenocarcinoma of theesophagogastric junction: incidence, characteristics, and treatment strategies. Gastric Cancer, 2010, 13(2):63-73.
  • 3秦新裕.食管胃交界部腺癌的特点及外科治疗[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2010,13(9):637-639. 被引量:14
  • 4American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th-ed. Springer: New York, 2009 : 129-144.
  • 5王晓新,李宏芹,陈鸿义,刘桐林,李简.不同手术径路治疗贲门癌的对比研究[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(19):1262-1264. 被引量:43
  • 6Barbour AP, Rizk NP, Gonen M, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction influence of esophageal resection margin and operative approach on outcome. Ann Surg, 2007,246( 1 ) : 1-8.
  • 7DiMusto PD, Orringer MB. Transhiatal esophagectomy for distal and cardia cancers : implications of a positive gastric margin.Ann Thorac Surg, 2007,83(6) : 1993-1999.
  • 8Siewert JR, Feith M, Stein HJ. Biologic and clinical variations of adenocarcinonm at the esophago-gastric junction:relevance of a topographic--anatomic subclassification. J Surg Oncol, 2005,90(3) : 139-146.
  • 9Yamamoto M, Baba H, Egashira A, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction in Japan. Hepato-gastroenterology, 2008,55 (81) : 103-107.
  • 10Kang CH, Kim YT, Jeon SH, et al. Lymphadenectomy extent is closely related to long-term survival in esophageal cancer. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg, 2007, 31(2) : 154-160.

二级参考文献21

  • 1Husemann B.Cardia carcinoma considered as a distinct clinical entity.Br J Surg,1989,76(2):136-139.
  • 2Siewert JR,Holscher AH,Becker K,et al.Cardia cancer:attempt at a therapeuticaiiy relevant classification.Chirurg,1987,58(1):25-32.
  • 3Siewert JR,Stein HJ.Classification of the adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.Br J Surg,1998,85(11):1457-1459.
  • 4Siewert JR,Feith M,Stein HJ.Biologic and clinical variations of adenocarcinoma at the esophago-gastric junction:relevance of a topographic-anatomic subclassification.J Surg Oncol,2005,90(3):139-146.
  • 5Barboer AP,Rizk NP,Gonen M,et al.Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction influence of esophageal resection margin and operative approach on outcome.Ann Surg,2007,246(1):1-8.
  • 6Feith M,Stein HJ,Siewert JR,et al.Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction:surgical therapy based on 1602 consecutive resected patients.Surg Oncol Clin N Am,2006,15(4):751-764.
  • 7Hulscher JB,Tijssen JG,Obertop H,et al.Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus:a meta-analysis.Ann Thorac Surg,2001,72(1):306-313.
  • 8Stein HJ,Feith M,Siewert JR.Cancer of the esophagogastric junction.Surg Oncol,2000,9(1):35-41.
  • 9Hulscher JB,van Sandick JW,de Boer AG,et al.Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.N Engl J Med,2002,347(21):1662-1669.
  • 10Kim JH,Park SS,Kim J,et al.Surgical outcomes for gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach.World J Surg,2006,30(10):1870-1878.

共引文献55

同被引文献49

  • 1冯庆来,尚淑艳,赵锡江.胸段食管癌淋巴结转移规律的探讨[J].中国肿瘤临床,2005,32(12):706-708. 被引量:53
  • 2魏国,毕建威,申晓军,聂明明,薛绪潮,华积德.贲门癌食管旁淋巴结转移的特点与手术切口的选择[J].中国普通外科杂志,2005,14(12):928-930. 被引量:22
  • 3Ajani JA, Barthel JS, Bentrem DJ, et al. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers [J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2011,9(8):830-887.
  • 4Oda I, Abe S, Kusano C, et al. Correlation between endoscopic macroscopic type and invasion depth for early esophagogastric j unctionadenocarcinomas [J]. Gastric Cancer, 2011,14 (1):22-27 DOI: 10.1007/s 10120-011-0001-0.
  • 5Tinmouth J, Green J, Ko Y J, et al. A population-based analysis of esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinomas in Ontario, Canada: incidence, risk factors, and regional variation [J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2011,15(5):782-790. DOI:10.1007/sl1605-011-1450-9.
  • 6Lerut T, Decker G, Coosemans W, et al. Quality indicators of surgery for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction [J]. Recent Results Cancer Res, 2010,182:127-142.DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70579-6_11.
  • 7Cense HA, Sloof GW, Klaase JM, et al. Lymphatic drainage routes of the gastric cardia visualized by lymphoscintigraphy [J]. J Nucl Med, 2004,45(2):247-252.
  • 8Yamashita H, Katai H, Morita S, et al. Optimal extent of lymph node dissection for Siewert type II esophagogastric junction carcinoma[J]. Ann Surg, 2011,254(2):274-280. DOI: 10.1097/SLA. 0b013e3182263911.
  • 9Gertler R, Stein H J, Schuster T, et al. Prevalence and topography of lymph node metastases in early esophageal and gastric cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2014,259(1):96-101. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000239.
  • 10Hosokawa Y, Kinoshita T, Konishi M, et al. Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junctionaccording to Siewert classification: experiences at a single institution in Japan [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012,19(2):677-683. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1983-x.

引证文献6

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部