期刊文献+

腔镜微创食管癌切除术的学习过程分析 被引量:15

Analysis of learning process of video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的总结腔镜微创食管癌切除术(MIE)的学习过程。方法选取同一组医生连续完成的MIE手术100例,按手术时间顺序分为3组:第1、2组各25例行胸腔镜并常规开腹手术,第3组50例行胸腹腔镜手术.分别记录手术时间、出血量、正常结构保护及并发症发生情况、术后ICU观察时间、住院时间、术后肿瘤病理及淋巴结清扫情况等临床资料,比较各组之间的差异。结果全组中96例患者顺利完成MIE,4例患者中转开胸,无中转开腹。中位手术时间310min,中位失血量200ml,中位清扫淋巴结22枚,总体并发症发生率50%。第1组与第2组比较,在保留奇静脉弓(P=0.010)、保留支气管动静脉(P=0.038)及左侧喉返神经胸段术中暴露率(P=0.048)方面的差异有统计学意义。前50例与后50例比较,在胸部手术时间(P=0.000)、失血量(P=0.025)、保留奇静脉弓(P=0.001)、保留支气管动静脉(P=0.000)、胸野淋巴结清扫(P=0.022)、左喉返神经链淋巴结清扫(P=0.000)及该神经起始部术中暴露率(P=0.002)方面的差异有统计学意义。结论MIE学习过程较长.应循序渐进。随着经验的积累和手术技巧的提升.MIE将逐渐显示其独特的优势并替代传统开胸食管癌切除术。 Objective To evaluate the learning process of video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Methods One hundred consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma were treated by a same team of surgeons, and were divided into 3 groups in chronological order. The former two groups both consisted of 25 patients with thoracoscopy plus laparotomy. The remaining 50 patients were enrolled in the third group with thoracoscopy plus laparoscopy. Clinieopathological data including operative time, blood loss, protection of normal structures, complications, length of ICU stay, postoperative stay, and lymph nodes harvest, were collected and compared between groups. Results Procedures were accomplished successfully in 96 patients. Only 4 cases were converted to open thoracotomy and none to laparotomy. The median operative time was 310 min and blood loss was 200 ml. The median number of lymph node harvest was 22. The overall complication rate was 50%. Comparison of first two groups revealed that significant differences existed in the preservation rate of arch of azygos vein (P=0.010), bronchial vessels (P=0.038), and exposure rate of thoracic part of left recurrent laryngeal nerve (P=0.048). Comparison of the former and latter 50 patients revealed that significant differences existed in thoracic operative time (P〈0.001), blood loss (P=0.025), preservation rate of arch of azygos vein (P=0.001) and bronchial vessels (P〈0.001), the number of lymph node harvest in thoracoscopy(P=0.022) and in left recurrent laryngeal nerve chain(P〈0.001 ), and exposure rate of initiate part of left recurrent laryngeal nerve (P=0.002). Conclusion The learning curve of MIE is long and beginners should proceed step by step.
出处 《中华胃肠外科杂志》 CAS 2012年第9期918-921,共4页 Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
基金 卫生部部属(管)医院临床学科重点项目(179) 中山大学临床医学研究5010计划(2007048)
关键词 食管肿瘤 微创外科 食管切除术 学习曲线 Esophageal neoplasms Esophagectomy Minimally invasive surgery Learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, et al. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc, 2010,24(7) : 1621-1629.
  • 2Miller JD, Jain MK, de Gara CJ, et al. Effect of surgical experience on results of esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol, 1997,65 ( 1 ) : 20-21.
  • 3Rice TW, Blackstone EH, Rusch VW. 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual : esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Ann Surg Oncol, 2010,17(7) : 1721-1724.
  • 4Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, et al. Learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and results. Surg Endosc, 2003,17(3):515-519.
  • 5Song SY, Na K J, Oh SG, et al. Learning curves of minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2009,35 (4) : 689-693.
  • 6Verhage RJ, Hazebroek EJ, Boone J, et al. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir, 2009,64(2) : 135-146.
  • 7Braghetto I, Csendes A, Cardemil G, et al. Open transthoracic transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival. Surg Endosc, 2006,20( 11 ) : 1681-1686.
  • 8Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, et al. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study. Ann Surg, 2012,255(2) : 197-203.
  • 9Ben-David K, Rossidis G, Zloteeki RA, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and effective following neoadjuvant chemo-radiation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol, 2011, 18 (12) : 3324-3329.

同被引文献120

引证文献15

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部