期刊文献+

颈椎间盘置换治疗脊髓型颈椎病的疗效观察 被引量:4

EFFECTIVENESS OF CERVICAL DISC REPLACEMENT FOR CERVICAL MYELOPATHY
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨颈椎间盘置换治疗脊髓型颈椎病的疗效。方法 2006年10月-2008年10月,采用椎间盘置换治疗20例(26个节段)脊髓型颈椎病患者。男8例,女12例;年龄26~65岁,平均46岁。病程2~18个月,平均7个月。单节段置换14例,双节段置换6例。术后以Odom等标准评价疗效,以疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)评价颈、肩部及上肢疼痛情况。X线片测量假体椎间盘间隙角及颈椎过屈、过伸位活动度,观察异位骨化、骨赘形成及假体松动等情况。结果术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无严重并发症发生。20例均获随访,随访时间30~48个月,平均34个月。术后28个月按Odom等标准获优17例、良3例,颈、肩部及上肢VAS评分均较术前显著改善(P<0.05)。术后30个月,20个置换节段未融合,假体活动度为(10.6±4.5)°,与上位相邻节段的(10.8±3.7)°和下位相邻节段的(7.5±4.2)°比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后10例13个节段发生异位骨化,1例假体后方移位;其他假体无移位、下沉、松动等并发症发生。结论颈椎间盘置换治疗脊髓型颈椎病能维持颈椎正常活动范围和生理弯曲,但其功能和对邻近节段的影响需进一步随访。 Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of cervical disc replacement for cervical myelopathy. Methods Between October 2006 and October 2008, 20 patients (26 segments) with cervical myelopathy underwent single-level (14 segments) or bi-level (6 segments) cervical disc replacement. There were 8 males and 12 females with an average age of 46 years (range, 26-65 years). The disease duration ranged 2-18 months (mean, 7 months). The effectiveness was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) score, cervical range of motion (ROM), and the Odom et al. criteria. Heterotopic ossification (HO), osteophyte formation, and prosthesis loosening were observed. Results All incisions healed by first intention, with no severe complication. Twenty patients were followed up 30-48 months (mean, 34 months). At 28 months after operation, according to Odom et al. criteria, the results were excellent in 17 cases and good in 3 cases. The VAS scores of the neck, shoulder, and upper limb were significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores (P 〈 0.05). At 30 months after operation, X-ray films showed that 20 replaced segments were mobile and ROM was (10.6 ± 4.5)°, showing no significant difference (P 〉 0.05) when compared with that of upper adjacent segment (10.8 ± 3.7)° and lower adjacent segment (7.5 ± 4.2)°. HO occurred in 10 cases (13 segments). No displacement, subsidence, or loosening occurred except 1 case of retrodisplacement of the prosthesis. Conclusion Cervical disc replacement can obtain good effectiveness. It can maintain normal cervical ROM and physiological curvature. But it needs further long-term follow-up to evaluate the function and the influence on the adjacent segments.
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第9期1058-1061,共4页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
关键词 颈椎间盘置换 脊髓型颈椎病 颈椎间盘突出症 Cervical disc replacement Cervical myelopathy Cervical disc protrusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Odom GL, Finney W, Woodhall B. Cervical disc lesions. J Am Med As- soc, 1958, 166(1): 23-28.
  • 2McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, et al. Classification of hetero- topic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2003, 16(4): 384-389.
  • 3农鲁明,周栋,徐南伟.人工颈椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎病的中期疗效观察[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2010,20(7):567-571. 被引量:15
  • 4郭隆升,马晓春,付鹏,王涛.Bryan人工颈椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎病初步探讨[J].中国现代医生,2010,48(8):145-146. 被引量:4
  • 5Goffin J, van Loon J, van Calenbergh F, et al. A clinical analysis of 4- and 6-year follow-up results after cervical disc replacement surgery us- ing the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. J Neurosurg Spine, 2010, 12(3): 261-269.
  • 6Cheng L, Nie L, Zhang L, et al. Fusion versus Bryan Cervical Disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomized study. Int Orthop, 2008, 33(5): 1037-1351.
  • 7Kim SW, Limson MA, Kim SB, et al. Comparison of radiographic, changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi- level cases. Eur Spine 1, 2009, 18(2): 218-231.
  • 8Wenger M, van Hoonacker P, Zachee B, et al. Bryan cervical disc pros- thesis: preservation of function over time. J Clin Neurosci, 2009, 16(2): 220-225.
  • 9刘文华,朱兵,刘晓伟,孙宇.单节段Bryan人工颈椎间盘置换术后异位骨化的发生率和疗效观察[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2012,26(6):699-702. 被引量:11
  • 10Leung C, Casey AT, Goffin l, et al. Clinical significance of heteroptopic ossification in cervical disc replacement: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Neurosurgery, 2005, 57(4): 759-763.

二级参考文献40

  • 1王岩,肖嵩华,陆宁,张雪松.颈人工椎间盘假体置换术的临床应用[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(21):1333-1337. 被引量:34
  • 2Pointillart V.Cervical disc prosthesis in humans:first failures[J].Spine,2001,26(5):90-92.
  • 3Goffin J,Van Calenbergh F,Van Loon J,el al.Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis:single-level and bi-level[J].Spine,2003,28(24):2673-2678.
  • 4Sasso RC,Smucker JD,Hacker RJ,et al.Artificial disc versus fusion:a prospective,randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2007,32(26):2933-2942.
  • 5Beaurain J,Bernard P,Dufonr T,et al.Intermediate clinical and radiologieal results of cervical TDR(Mobi-C)with up to 2 years of follow-up[J].Eur Spine J,2009,18(6):841-850.
  • 6Goffin J,van Loon J,Van Cahnbergh F,et al.A clinical analysis of 4-and 6-year follow-up results after cervical disc replacement surgery using the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis[J].J Neurosurg,Spine,2010,12(3):261-269.
  • 7Yang S,Wu X,Hu Y,et al.Early and intermediate follow-up results after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis:single-and multiple-level[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2008,33(12):E371-377.
  • 8Piekett GE,Sekhon LH,Sears WR,et al.Complication with cervical arthmplasty[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2006,4(2):98-105.
  • 9Leung C,Casey AT,Goffin J,el al.Clinical significance of heterotopie ossification in cervical disc replacement:a prospective multieenter clinical trial[J].Neurosurgery,2005,57(4):759-763.
  • 10Sola S,Hebecker R,Knoop M,et al.Bryan cervical disc prosthesis:three years follow-up[J].Ear Spine J,2005,14(Suppl 1):38.

共引文献27

同被引文献71

  • 1何智勇,李开南,聂海,母建松,兰海.Discover人工颈椎间盘置换治疗颈椎间盘退变性疾病的临床疗效[J].四川医学,2012,33(11):1930-1932. 被引量:3
  • 2周思启,陈惠德,汤健,杨庆国,吴毅文.脊髓型颈椎病患者颈椎间盘白细胞介素6和肿瘤坏死因子α水平与日本骨科学会颈髓功能评分的相关性[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2007,11(6):1035-1037. 被引量:14
  • 3Kim S W,Limson M A,Kim S B,et al. Comparison of adiographic change after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi- level case [ J ]. Eur Spine J,2009,18 ( 2 ) : 218 - 231.
  • 4Jawahar A,Cavanaugh D A,Kerr E J 3rd,et al. Total disc arthro- plasty does not affect the incidence of adjacent segment degenera- tion in cervical spine : results of 93 patients in three prospective randomized clinical trials [ J ]. Spine J, 2010,10 ( 12 ) : 1043 - 1048.
  • 5Park D K,Lin E L,Philips F M. Index and adjacent level kine- matics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ) , 2011,36(9) :721 -730.
  • 6Chang U K,Kim D h,Lee M C,et al. Changs in adjacent- |evel disc pressure and fact jiont force after cervical arthroplasty com- pared with cervical discectomy and fusion [ J ]. Neurosueg Spine, 2007,7( 1 ) :33 -39.
  • 7Smith GW, Robinson RA. Thet reatment of certaincerviea 12spine disorders by an teriorrem oval of thein terver tebraldisc and in terbodyfusion[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1958;40(3):607-624.
  • 8Goffin J,Casey A, Kehr P, et al. Prelimina ryclinica lexpe riencew iththe Bryan Cervica ID iscProsthesis[J].Neuro surgery,2002;51 (3):840-845.
  • 9Pak DK,Lin EL,Philips FM. Index arml adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitaive radiographic analysis [J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2011 ; 3619:721-730.
  • 10Zechmeister I,Winkler R,Mad P. Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for the cervical spine: a systematic veview[J]. Eur spine J,2011; 2:177-184.

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部