期刊文献+

比较数字断层融合与数字X线摄影检出模拟肺结节的能力 被引量:5

Comparison of detection rate for simulated lung nodules between digital tomosynthesis and digital radiography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的利用仿真体模对比分析数字断层融合(DTS)与数字X线摄影(DR)检出模拟肺结节的能力。方法采用五种规格(直径3、5、8、10、12mm)、三种密度(CT值100、-630及-800HU)的模拟肺结节共15个,先后分别置于体模两肺的上、中、下肺野,形成模拟肺结节共计90个(15个×6)。以常规曝光参数分别进行DTS和DR,由2名放射科医师独立评价DTS及DR对肺结节的检出率;测量DTS的辐射剂量,转换为有效剂量,与文献报道的DR有效剂量进行对比。结果 DTS对模拟肺结节的检出率为78.89%(71/90),DR的检出率为28.89%(26/90),DTS检出率高于DR(P<0.01);对于三种不同密度(CT值100、-630和-800HU)的模拟结节,DTS与DR的检出率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。DTS的有效剂量高于文献报道的DR剂量。结论对于肺结节,DTS较DR具有更高的检出率。 Objective To compare the detection ability of pulmonary nodules for chest digital tomosynthesis (DTS) and digital radiography (DR)by using anthropomorphic chest phantom and simulated nodules. Methods Fifteen simulated nodules with five different diameters (3, 5, 8, 10, 12 mm) and three different densities (100, -630, -830 HU) were placed into the upper, middle and lower lung field of both sides (totally 6 times) for the male anthropomorphic chest phantom, respectively. Then DR and DTS with conventional scan parameters were performed. Two radiologists independently assessed the detection rate of pulmonary nodules. The organic radiations doses were recorded and were converted into effective doses (ED) and compared. Results The detection rate of pulmonary nodule of DTS and DR was 78.89 % (71/90) and 28.89 (26/90), respectively (P〈0.01). For detection rate of pulmonary nodule with different densities, there were significant differences between DTS and DR (P〈0. 01). The mean ED of DTS was 0.65 mSv. Conclusion DTS is superior to DR for relative low-dose detection of pulmonary nodules.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第9期1736-1739,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 重庆市卫生局课题资助项目(08-2-29)
关键词 数字体层融合 X线影像增强 辐射剂量 多发肺结节 Digital tomosynthesise Radiographic image enhancement Radiation dosage Multiple pulmonary nodule
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Machida H, Yuhara T, Mori T, et al. Optimizing parameters for flat-panel detector digital tomosynthesis. Radiographics, 2010,30 (2) :549-562.
  • 2Bauhs JA, Vrieze TJ, Primak AN, et al. CT Dosimetry: Com- parison of measurement techniques and devices. Radiographics, 2008,28(1) :245-253.
  • 3Valentin J. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Com- mission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP, 2007, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 37(2-4):1-332.
  • 4陈世沛,赵张平,李剑波,朱文玲,彭容.数字断层融合技术对肺内非钙化性结节灶检出能力评价[J].中国医学影像技术,2011,27(11):2234-2237. 被引量:5
  • 5Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Hasegawa I, et al. Fast scanning tomo- synthesis for the detection of pulmonary nodules: Diagnostic per- formance compared with chest radiography, using multidetector- row computed tomography as the reference. Invest Radiol, 2011, 46(8) : 471-477.
  • 6James TD, Mcadams HP, Song JW, et al. Digital tomosynthesis of the chest for lung nodule detection: Interim sensitivity results from an ongoing NIH-sponsored trial. Med Phys, 2008, 35 (6) : 2554-2557.
  • 7Vikgren J, Zaehrisson S, Svalkvist A, et al. Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: Human observer study of clinical cases. Radiology, 2008,249(3) : 1034-1041.
  • 8van't Westeinde SC, de Koning H J, Xu DM, et al. How to deal with incidentally detected pulmonary nodules less than 10 mm in size on CT in a healthy "person. Lung Cancer, 2008,60(2):151- 159.
  • 9Kodama K, Higashiyama M, Yokouchi H, et al. Prognostic val- ue of ground-glass opacity found in small lung adenocarcinoma on high-resolution CT scanning. Lung Cancer, 2001,33(1) :17-25.
  • 10Ikeda K, Awai K, Mori T, et al. Differential diagnosis of ground-glass opacity nodules: CT number analysis by three-di- mensional computerized quantification. Chest, 2007, 132 (3) : 984-990.

二级参考文献14

  • 1McAdams HP, Samei E, Dobbins J 3rd, et al. Recent advances in chest radiography. Radiology, 2006,241(3):663 683.
  • 2Vikgren J, Zachrisson S, Svalkvist A, et al. Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: human observer study of clinical cases. Radiology, 2008,249(3)1034-1041.
  • 3Dobbins JT 3rd, Godfrey DJ. Digital X-ray tomosynthesis: cur- rent state of the art and clinical potential. Phys Med Biol, 2003, 48(19) :R65-R106.
  • 4Dobbins JT 3rd, McAdams HP, Godfrey DJ, et al. Digital tomo synthesis of the chest. J Thorae Imaging, 2008,23(2):86-92.
  • 5Kim EY, Chung MJ, Lee HY, et al. Pulmonary mycobacterial disease: diagnostic performance of low-dose digital tomosynthesis as compared with chest radiography. Radiology, 2010, 257 (1) : 269-277.
  • 6Svalkvist A, M~nsson LG, Bath M. Monte Carlo simulations of the dosimetry of chest tomosynthesis. Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 2010, 139(1-3) :144-152.
  • 7Morin RL, Gerber TC, MeCollough CH. Radiation dose in corn puted tomography of the heart. Circulation, 2003,107(6) :917- 922.
  • 8Wolbarst AB, Hendee WR. Evolving and experimental technol ogies in medical imaging. Radiology, 2006,238(1) :16 39.
  • 9白玫,刘彬,郑钧正,彭明辰.两种介入放射学(CA和PTCA)所致患者辐射剂量研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(12):1876-1881. 被引量:23
  • 10黄锐,冯敢生,杨炼,刘宇,李林,叶遐玲.双能减影和常规DR对肺结节或肿块检出能力的比较[J].放射学实践,2008,23(8):877-880. 被引量:6

共引文献22

同被引文献37

引证文献5

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部