期刊文献+

剖宫产术后硬膜外镇痛对产妇催乳素及新生儿神经行为的影响 被引量:8

Effects of postoperative epidural analgesia on prolactin level and neonatal neurobehavioral scores after caesarean section
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究布托啡诺复合左布比卡因在剖宫产术后硬膜外镇痛对产妇泌乳及新生儿神经行为的影响。方法选择剖宫产产妇60例,按术后镇痛方式不同分为3组(B、M、C组,每组20例),B组:0.006%布托啡诺+0.15%左布比卡因;M组:0.004%的吗啡+0.15%左布比卡因;C组:术后疼痛时采用盐酸哌替啶肌注镇痛(1mg/kg)。B、M组采用连续硬膜外镇痛。术后进行视觉模拟评分(VAS)并记录恶心、呕吐等副作用发生率,测产妇血清催乳素(prolactin,PRL)浓度并记录产后初乳时间,进行新生儿神经和适应能力评分(NACS)。结果B组[4h:(1.1±0.7),8h:(1.2±1.2),12h:(1.7±1.1),24h:(1.4±1.5),48h:(1.0±0.9)]、M组[4h:(1.1±0.9),8h:(1.3±1.9),12h:(1.6±1.2),24h:(1.3±1.3),48h:(1.0±0.7)]的VAS评分明显低于c组[4h:(2.2±1.3),8h:(4.3±1.7),12h:(4.7±1.5),24h:(3.6±1.3),48h:(2.4±1.1)](P〈0.05),但M组恶心呕吐(30%)、瘙痒(25%)等副作用要明显高于B组(分别为:3%,0%)(P〈0.05),B组(26±8)h、M组(26±9)h泌乳时间要早于C组(35±10)h(P〈0.05),且B组[分别为:(357±62)、(387±63)μg/L]、M组[分别为:(367±64)、(392±61)μg/L]术后24、48hPRL明显高于术前[B组:(220±59)μg/L,M组:(238±70)μg/L及C组[分别为:(299±93)、(327±74)μg/L],而B、M差异无统计学意义,3组NACS比较无统计学意义。结论布托啡诺复合左布比卡因用于剖宫产术后硬膜外镇痛效果好、副作用少且可促进产妇泌乳,对新生儿神经行为无明显影响。 Objective To investigate the effect of postoperative epidural analgesia on prolactin level and neonatal neurological and adaptive capacity scores(NACS) after caesarean section. Methods Sixty healthy primipara after caesarean section under combined spinal epidural anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups(n=20). Received epidural analgesia with complex of butorphanol (0.006%) and levobupivacaine(0.15%) in group B, those with morphine(0.004%) and levobupivacaine(0.15%) in group M. Group C was given conventional postoperative analgesia with meperidine injection. The visual analog scales (VAS) and the adverse effects were observed at 4,8,12, 24 and 48 h after operation. Detect the prolactin (PRL) level in serum before operation, after operation 24 h and 48 h separately by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Keep note of the first lactation time. NACS was recorded at 24, 48 and 72 h. Results The VAS was significantly lower in group B [4 h:(1.1±0.7),8 h:(1.2±1.2), 12 h:(1.7± 1.1),24 h:(1.4±1.5),48 h:(1.0±0.9)] and group M [4 h: (1.1±0.9),8 h: (1.3±1.9),12 h: (1.6±1.2),24 h: (1.3±1.3),48 h: (1.0±0.7)1 than that in group C [4 h:(2.2±1.3),8 h:(4.3±1.7),12 h:(4.7±1.5),24 h:(3.6±1.3),48 h:(2.4±1.1)1 at all time points (P〈0.05). The adverse effects of pruritus, nausea and vomiting were significantly more in group M (25%,30%,respectively) than that in group B (5% ,0%,respectively)(P〈0.05). The first lactation time of the group B (26±8) h and M (26±9) h were distinctively earlier than that of the group C (35±10) h (P〈0.05). The PRL concentration in serum of the group B [(357±62),(387±63) μg/L, respectively ± and group M [(367±64), (392±61 ) μg/L,respectively ] at 24, 48 h after operation were higher than that of the group C E (299±93), (327±74) μg/L, respectively] (P〈0.05). There was no significant difference NACS among the 3 groups. Conclusions Combined with butorphanol levobupivacaine, epidural analgesia in parturient after cesarean section can provide effective analgesia, with less pruritus, nausea and vomiting, and promoting lactation without untoward reaction on NACS.
出处 《国际麻醉学与复苏杂志》 CAS 2012年第9期610-613,共4页 International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation
基金 深圳市科技计划项目(201003455)
关键词 布托啡诺 剖宫产术 硬膜外镇痛 催乳素 新生儿 Butorphanol Caesarean section Epidural analgesia Prolactin Neonatal
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献33

  • 1王德明,孙晓峰,张元信,孙永兴,何旭.布托啡诺超前镇痛对罗哌卡因臂丛阻滞效果影响的临床评价[J].中国现代医学杂志,2006,16(21):3281-3283. 被引量:13
  • 2张兆平,孙国华,顾晓峰.布托啡诺在术后镇痛的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(5):367-368. 被引量:63
  • 3PALACIOS Q T, JONES M M, HAWKINS J L, et al. Post - casearean section analgesia: a comparison of epidural butorphanol and morphine[J]. Can J Anaesth, 1991, 38( 1 ) : 24 -30.
  • 4WITTELS B, TOLEDANO A. The effects of epidural morphine and epidural butorphanol on matemal outcomes after cesarean delivery[J]. Anesth Analg, 1995, 81(6): 1 317-1 318.
  • 5ATKINSON B D, TRUITr L J, RAYBURN W F, et al. Double - blind comparison of intravenous butorphanol (Stadol) and fentanyl (Sublimaze) for analgesia during labor[ J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1994, 171(4) : 993 -998.
  • 6MORRISON S G, DOMINGUEZ J J, FRASCAROLO P, et al. A comparison of the electrocardiographic cardiotoxic effects of racemic bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine in anesthetized swine[J]. Anesth Analg, 200, 90(6) : 1 308 -1 314.
  • 7LEE B B, NGAN KEE W D, LAU W M, et al. Epidural infusions for labor analgesia:a comparison of 0.2% ropivacaine,0.1% ropivacaine, and 0. 1% ropivacaine with fentanyl [ J ]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2002, 27(1): 31 -36.
  • 8FAN L W, TIEN L T, TANAKA S, et al. Ho IK Changes in the brain Kappa - opioid receptor levels of rats in withdrawal from physical dependence upon butorphanol [ J ]. Neuroscience, 2003, 121(4): 1 063 -1 074.
  • 9PEACHEY J E. Clinical observations of agonist - antagonist analgesic dependence [J]. Drug Alcohol Depend, 1987, 20(4) : 347 -365.
  • 10VOGELSANG J, HAYES S R. Butorphanol tartrate (stadol) : a review [J]. J Post Anesth, 1991,6(2) : 129 - 135.

共引文献150

同被引文献49

  • 1蔡美华,张马忠,荣征星,江涛,王玉梅,崔永耀.甲磺酸罗哌卡因和盐酸罗哌卡因硬膜外阻滞的药代动力学特征比较[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2011,31(5):584-587. 被引量:17
  • 2黄建军,石莺,詹瑞森,高志远.血清髓鞘碱性蛋白含量对脊髓损伤程度早期诊断价值的实验研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(16):1256-1259. 被引量:4
  • 3庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮.现代麻醉学.3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:524-525.
  • 4Shang H, Yang Y, Tong X et al. Gum chewing slightly enhances early recovery from postoperative ilcus after cesarean section: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. American Journal of Perinatology, 2010, 27(5): 387-391.
  • 5连庆泉,主译.产科麻醉学理论与实践.4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:549.
  • 6Rauch E. Intrathecal hydromorphone for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery: a retrospective study [J]. AANA J, 2012, 80(4 Suppl) : $25-$32.
  • 7Saitoh K, Suzuki H, Hirabayashi Y, et al. Combined spinal epidural anesthesia for emergency cesarean section [J]. MASUI, 2005,54 (10) : 1121-1124.
  • 8Jankovic ZB,Du Feu FM,McConnell P. An anatomical study of the transversus abdominis plane blokc:location of the lumbar triangle of Petit and adjacent nerves [J]. Anesth Analg, 2009,109(3) :981-985.
  • 9Patel SA, Gotkin J, Huang R, et al. Transversus abdomi- nis plane block for postoperative analgesia after caesare an delivery [J]. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med, 2012,25 ( 11 ) : 2270-2273.
  • 10Baaj J, Atsatli R, Maj aj H, et al. Efficacy of ultrasound guid- ed transversus abdominis plane(TAP)block for post-cae- sarean delivery analgesia-a double-blind,placebo-con- trolled,randomized study [J]. Middle East J Anesth, 2010, 20(6) :821-826.

引证文献8

二级引证文献136

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部