期刊文献+

我国卫生保健相对价格对人均卫生费用的影响研究:基于ARDL模型的分析

Research of Effect of Relative Prices of Health Care on Health Expenditure Per Capita in China:Based on ARDL Model Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:深入研究卫生保健商品或服务的相对价格对人均卫生费用的短期与长期影响。方法:基于1986—2009年宏观时间序列数据,在考虑人均GDP、政府卫生投入等因素前提下,采用自回归分布滞后模型(ARDL)与误差修正模型(ECM)进行分析。结果与结论:⑴卫生保健商品相对价格对于人均实际卫生费用的影响要明显大于卫生保健服务相对价格和政府卫生投入比例增长率的影响;⑵相对于其他消费品,卫生保健商品相对价格的持续下降会促使人均实际卫生费用增长率也呈现下降趋势;卫生保健服务相对价格的下降可能会刺激人们卫生保健服务需求,提高实际人均卫生费用的增长率;⑶政府卫生投入比例的上升会导致实际人均卫生费用增长率增加,产生明显的正向效应。 Objective: To explore the short and long tern1 effects of relative price of goods of heahh care on health expenditures per capita. Methods: Based on macro time series data, through taking into account factot~ such as per capita GDP, government health input provided, auto-regressive distributed lag models (ARDL) and en'or correction model (ECM) are established to analyze the effects. Results and Conclusions: (1) The effects of relative prices of health care goods on real health expenditure per capita are much greater than the relative price of t^ealth care services and the growth rate of government investment in health care. (2) Compared with other goods, the decreasing of relative prices of heahh care goods would promote the decreasing of real heahh expendition per capita; The decline in relative prices of health care services could stimulate the demand for health care services and increase the actual growth rate of per capita heahh expenditure. (3) Increasing in the proportion of government health input will cause an increase in real per capita heahh expenditure growth, which has a significant positive effect.
出处 《中国卫生经济》 北大核心 2012年第9期34-37,共4页 Chinese Health Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金(11CRK017) 教育部人文社科研究项目(12YJC840033) 山东省高校人文社科研究计划项目(J11WG14)
关键词 卫生保健商品相对价格 卫生保健服务相对价格 人均卫生费用 ARDL模型 relalive prices of health care goods relative prices of heahh care services health expenditure per capita ARDL model
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献8

  • 1Paul Hansen, Alan King. The determinants of health care expenditure:A cointegration approach. Journal of Health Economics, 1996 (15):127-137.
  • 2Newhouse, Corss National Differences in Helath Spending, What Do They Mean? Journal of Health Economies, 1987(6):159-162.
  • 3Thomas E.Getzen, Health care is an individual necessity and a national luxury: applying multilevel decision models to the analysis of health care expenditures, Journal of Health Economics, 2000( 19 ) : 259-270.
  • 4Suzanne K.Mccoskey, Thomas M.Selden. Health care expenditures and GDP: panel data unit root test results. Journal of Health Economics, 1998 ( 17 ) : 369-376.
  • 5A.G,Blomqvist and R.A.LCarter.Is health care really a luxury,Journal of Health Economics, 1997(16):207-229.
  • 6U.-G.Gerdtham, Mickael Lothgren. On stationarity and colntegration of international health expenditure and GDP, Journal of Health Economics, 2000 ( 19 ) :461-475.
  • 7Todd Jewell, Junsoo Lee, Margie Tieslau. Stationaryity of health expenditures and GDP: evidence from panel unit root tests with heterogeneous structural breaks" Journal of Health Economics,2003 (22) : 313-323.
  • 8国家统计局国民经济核算司编,许宪春.中国国内生产总值核算历史资料[M]中国统计出版社,2004.

共引文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部