期刊文献+

横向并购效率抗辩中的最低要求效率研究 被引量:9

Research on the Minimum Required Efficiencies in the Efficiency Defense of Horizontal Mergers
原文传递
导出
摘要 在横向并购评估审查中,反垄断当局往往采用一些结构类指标作为门槛值对并购进行初步筛选,自动接受一些低于低水平门槛值且对竞争没有损害的并购,自动拒绝一些高于高水平门槛值并明显具有反竞争效应的并购。同时,对处于二者之间的并购启动效率抗辩评估审查,将并购可能产生的效率效应与反竞争效应进行权衡比较。在效率抗辩中,反垄断当局需要计算实际效率与最低要求效率(MREs),并权衡比较二者的大小,作为司法判定的主要依据。最低要求效率就是能够保证一项并购不会产生价格上涨效应的最低效率,或者说是能够抵消市场势力效应、降低价格或保持价格不上涨的成本节约的最低程度。最低要求效率是并购评估审查中效率抗辩的一项基准指标,可以作为判断并购是否具有反竞争效应的一项依据。本文从价格下降的视角分析了最坏情境下的最低要求效率,联系具体竞争模型推导了最低要求效率的测算公式和模拟分析方法,并讨论了并购可能产生的正外部效应对评估审查中最低要求效率的影响。 The antitrust authorities tend to adopt some structural indicators as the preliminary screening of mergers and accept automatically some mergers which are lower than the low-level threshold and no harm to the competitive, reject automatically some mergers which are higher than the high-level threshold and have clearly anti-competitive effects. Then the antitrust authorities allow the mergers which are between low-level threshold and the high-level threshold to start an efficiency defense anff tradeoff the efficiency effect and anti-competitive effects that may arise from the merger. In the efficiency defense, the antitrust authorities need to distinguish and calculate the value of actual efficiencies and the minimum requirements efficiencies (MREs), and compare their sizes. The paper analyzed the MREs in the worst-case scenario from the perspective of falling price, deduced the calculation formula and simulation methods of the MREs contacting the specific competition model, and discussed the effects which may generated from positive external effects on the MREs in the assessment review of mergers.
作者 余东华
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第9期64-76,共13页 China Industrial Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"横向并购反垄断控制中的效率抗辩研究"(批准号11FJL013) 教育部人文社会科学基金青年项目"经营者集中的反垄断控制:理论模型 量化标准与安全港规则研究"(批准号10YJC790351) 山东省人文社会科学规划项目"蓝色经济区建设中企业并购的反垄断控制研究"(批准号10CJGJ04)
关键词 横向并购 最低要求效率 评估审查 效率抗辩 horizontal mergers minimun requirements efficiencies(MREs) assessment review efficiency defense
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Roller, J.H. et al. Efficiency Gains from Mergers[J]. European Economy,2001,31(5).
  • 2Stennek J., and F. Verboven. Merger Control and Enterprise Competitiveness: Empirical Analysis and Policy Recommendations [A]. Ilzkovitz, F., and R. Meiklejohn. European Merger Control: Do We Need an Efficiency Defense[C]. Edward Elgar: Northampton, MA, USA, 2006.
  • 3Feenstra, R. C., J. E. Gagnon, and M. Michael. Market Share and Exchange Rate Pass-through in World Automobile Trade[J]. Journal of International Economics, 1996,40(2).
  • 4Morgan, E. J. The Treatment ot Oligopoly under the European Merger Control Regulation [J]. Antitrust Bulletin, 1996, (Spring).
  • 5Farrell J., and Shapiro C. Horizontal Merger: An Equilibrium Analysis[J]. American Economic Review,1990, 80 (1).
  • 6Baker J., and T. Bresnahan. Estimating the Residual Demand Curve Facing a Single Firm [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization,1985,6(3).
  • 7Verboven, Frank. International Price Discrimination in the European Car Market[J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 1996,27(2).
  • 8Froeb, L. M., and G. L. Werden. Stimulating the Effects of Mergers among Non-cooperative Oligopolists[A]. Varian, H. Mathematica for Economist[C]. Elservier, 1994.
  • 9余东华,乔岳,张伟.横向并购反垄断规制中的安全港规则研究[J].产业经济研究,2010(3):70-76. 被引量:11
  • 10余东华.横向并购反垄断审查中的效率因素分析[J].天津社会科学,2012(2):77-84. 被引量:8

二级参考文献13

  • 1Buccirossi, P. , Handbook of Antitrust Economics, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2008.
  • 2Scheffman, D. , Malcolm Coate and Louis Silvia, 2003, "Twenty Years of Merger Guidelines Enforcement at the FTC: An Economic Perspective", Antitrust Law Journal, (71) : 277-318.
  • 3ICN( International Competition Network), Report on Merger Guidelines, April 2004, Chapter 3, 1.28. available at http://www, internationalcompetitionnetwork. org/media/library/conference_3rd_seoul_2004/vickers. pdf.
  • 4Ivaldi, M. and F. Verboven, 2005," Quantifying the Effects from Horizontal Mergers in European Competition Policy",International Journal of Industrial Organization, (23) : 669-691.
  • 5Magill and Vardiabasis主编.《经济学百科全书》(中文版),吴易风等译,中国人民大学出版社2009版,第449-451页.
  • 6W.J.Kolasky&A.R.Dick,“The Merger Guidelines and theIntegration of Efficiencies into Antitrust Review of HorizontalMergers”,Antitrust Law Journal,2003(3).
  • 7余东华.《转型期中国产业组织优化研究》,经济管理出版社2008年版,第11-15页.
  • 8J.F.Brodley,“The Economic Goals of Antitrust:Efficiency,Consumer Welfare and Technological Progress”,New York U-niversity Law Review,1987(62).
  • 9M.Monti,“Review ofthe EC Merger Regulation-Roadmap to the Reform Project,Conference on Reform of European Merger Control”,BritishChamber of Commerce,Brussels,Commission Press ReleaseSpeech02-252,2002.
  • 10Simon Bishop&David Walker,The Economics of EC Com-petition Law-Concepts,Application and Measurement,Sweet&Maxwell,2002,pp.20-21.

共引文献16

同被引文献85

  • 1王凤荣,董法民.地方政府竞争与中国的区域市场整合机制——中国式分权框架下的地区专业化研究[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(3):11-25. 被引量:17
  • 2ROLLER, L.H., et al., Efficiency gains from mergers[J ]. European Economy, 2001, (31 ) : 1103 - 1156.
  • 3CAMESASCA, P.D., The Explicit Efficiency Defense in Merger Control: Does it Make the Difference[J]. European Competition Law Review, 1999, 20 (1): 23 -39.
  • 4B RODLEY, J. F., Proof of Efficiencies in Mergers and Joint Venture: Testing ex ante Claims against Ex post Evidence [J ] : Working paper NO. 7, November 1995.
  • 5克伍卡、怀特.反托拉斯革命[M].林平,臧旭恒.北京:经济科学出版社,2007.
  • 6Roller,L.H.,et al.,Efficiency gains from mergers[J].European Economy.2001,(31).
  • 7Whish,R.,Competition Law[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,Butterworth,5th Ed.,2005.
  • 8Camesasca,P.D.,The Explicit Efficiency Defense in Merger Control:Does it Make the Difference?[J].European Competition Law Review.1999,(1).
  • 9Ilzkovitz,F.,European Merger Control:Do We Need an Efficiency Defense?[J].Journal of Industry,Competition and Trade,2003,(3).
  • 10Seabright,P.,Ten Years of European Merger Control[N].IDEI Working Paper,2000.

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部