期刊文献+

中国企业LPSS能力与制度的双维共变——以中粮集团为例 被引量:3

The Co-evolution of Chinese Companies’ LPSS Capability Recursive Line with Institutional Transition Process——A Case Study of COFCO
原文传递
导出
摘要 新制度学派展开了制度环境与组织结构关系研究的新篇章,将"同形"与"脱耦"作为制度环境对组织结构塑形的两种主要方式。沿袭这一思路,结合中国企业的管理实践,本文创新性地将制度演化与企业能力模块化的逻辑相联系,研究并尝试性地提出了企业能力与制度之间的双维共变初始模型;采取单案例研究法,通过对竞争性行业大型国有企业中粮集团相关经验资料的搜集、编码与提炼,不断对初始模型进行修正匹配,最终发现:中国本土企业的能力演进呈"混合型特点",即在企业发展的不同阶段,企业能力重叠交替地表现出许可获取(Licence)、优质产品(Product)、顾客导向(Service)和系统创新(System)四个主要特点,但从时序上总体来说,又可概括为一条"许可获取—优质产品—顾客导向—系统创新"的LPSS能力演进曲线,融入边际成本和收益视角,该LPSS能力曲线呈螺旋式递归态势,且与制度环境发生双维共变。 This paper investigates one of China's large-sized state-owned companies(COFCO) in competitive industry with the combination of the organization capability theory and the neo-institutional view, some new concepts involved to be illustrated in depth are organizational isomorphism and decoupling, etc. Enlightened by China's real business practices, we have made the following findings and conclusions: (1)Ahhough Chinese companies' capabilities bear a "mixed feature", according to different emphasis in different period, generally speaking, they still can be divided into four categories, which can be named respectively as licence, product, service and system. (2)Based on a whole and historical view, a "licence-product-service-system" capability recursive curve could be drawn. (3)There is a co-evolution trend and mechanism between Chinese companies' capability recursion and the whole institutional environment.
作者 范黎波 张岚
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第9期135-147,共13页 China Industrial Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目"十二五时期我国发展的创新驱动战略研究"(批准号11&ZD004)
关键词 新制度学派 同形 脱耦 螺旋式递归 neo-institutional view isomorphism decoupling spiral recursion
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Meyer, Jone W., and Brian Rowen. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1977,83(4).
  • 2Meyer, K. E. Perspectives on Multinational Enterprises in Emerging Economies [J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2004,35 (4).
  • 31Dimaggio, Paul, and Water W. Powell. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields[J]. American Sociological Review,1983, (48).
  • 4Dimaggio, Paul, and Water W. Powell. Introducton in the New Institutionalism in Organizational Study[M]. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1991.
  • 5Levitt, B., March, J. G. Organizational Learning[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 1988,14(1 ).
  • 6Gavetti, G. Cognition and Hierarchy:Rethinking the Micro Foundation of Capabilities' Development [J]. Organization Science,2005,16(6).
  • 7North, D. C. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance[M]. Harvard University Press,1990.
  • 8IScott, W. R., Martin Ruef. A Multi-Dimensional Model of Organizational Legitimacy: Hospital Survival in Changing Institutional Environments[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998,43 (4).
  • 9Peng, M. W., Lee, S. H., and Wang, D. What Determines the Scope of the Firm over Time? A Focus on Institutional Relatedness[J]. Academy of Management Review,2005,30(3).
  • 10Peng, M. W., Wang, D., Jiang, Y. An Institution-based View of International Business Strategy: A Focus on Emerging Economies[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2008,39(5).

二级参考文献151

共引文献636

同被引文献47

  • 1徐尚昆,杨汝岱.企业社会责任概念范畴的归纳性分析[J].中国工业经济,2007(5):71-79. 被引量:149
  • 2道格拉斯·C·诺思,杭行译.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海:格致出版社·上海人民出版社,2008.23,83.
  • 3Porter E M, Van der Linde C. Green and competitive:Ending the stalemate[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1995,73(5): 120-134.
  • 4Porter E M, Kramer M R. Strategy & society: the Link between competitive advantage and corporate so- cial responsibility[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2006 (12):1-14.
  • 5Porter E M, Kramer M R. Creating shared value[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2011(1):62-77.
  • 6Vogel D. The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility[M]. Washing- ton, DC: The Brookings Institution, 2005.
  • 7Barnett L M. Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social re- sponsibility[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(3):794-816.
  • 8Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The Knowledge-Creating Compa- ny: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
  • 9Sethi S P. Dimensions of corporate social responsibili- ty[J]. California Management Review, 1975(3):58-64.
  • 10Hart S L. A natural resource-based view of the firm[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995,20(4):986-1014.

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部