期刊文献+

气候变化损害的国家责任:虚幻或现实 被引量:11

State Liability for Climate Change: Illusion or Reality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人类活动导致的气候变化是当前全球生态系统和人类生存所面临的最大威胁之一。受历史积累因素的影响,无论各国如何控制、削减温室气体排放,气候变化造成的损害仍不可避免,而气候变化损害的国家责任也日益成为国际社会无法回避的现实问题。作为一种特殊的跨界损害,气候变化损害无论在国际不法行为的认定还是因果关系的确定方面,都对现行国家责任制度提出了挑战。由于诸多障碍的存在,追究气候变化损害的国家责任在目前尚不具备充分的现实可行性。不过,来自国家责任的潜在压力至少有助于敦促各国积极改善温室气体排放政策,并就气候变化损害的救济尽快制定切实有效的全球性解决方案。 Human-induced climate change is one of the most serious threats to global ecosystem and human life. No matter how hard states try to control and reduce GHG emissions, some degree of damage is unavoidable due to past and current GHG emissions. Therefore, state liability for climate change is becoming a practical problem. As a special type of trans-boundary damage, climate change gives a challenge to the existing state liability regime in determining both international wrong act and causation. Due to various obstacles, seeking state liability for climate change is by no means feasible for the time being. However, pressure from potential state liability may at least urge states to improve their GHG emission policies and frame an effective global solution as soon as possible.
作者 龚宇
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期151-162,共12页 Modern Law Science
基金 2010年教育部人文社科项目"气候变化导致的重大跨界损害的责任承担"(10YJC820033) 2011年教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目"后京都时代中国应对全球气候变化之法律对策研究"(11JJD820019)
关键词 气候变化 损害 国家责任 climate change damage state liability
  • 相关文献

参考文献64

  • 1Rebecca E. Jacobs. Treading Deep Waters : Substantive Law Issues in Tuvalu ’ s Threat to Sue the United States in the International Court of Justice [ J]. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal,2005,( 14) : 103 - 128.
  • 2Andrew Strauss. Climate Change Litigation: Opening the Door to the International Court of Justice [ G]// William C. G. Bums & Hari M. Osofsky. Adjudicating Climate Change : State, National, and International Approaches. New York: Cambridge University Press,2009 : 334 — 356.
  • 3Richard S. J. Tol & Roda Verheyen. State Responsibility and Compensation for Climate Change Damages - A Legal and Economic Assessment [J]. Energy Policy, 2004, 32 : 1109 - 1130; Christina Voigt. State Responsibility for Climate Change Damages [ J]. Nordic Journal of International Law, 2008,77: 1-22.
  • 4Timo Koivurova. International Legal Avenues to Address the Plight of Victims of Climate Change : Problems and Prospects [ J ]. Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation, 2007, (22): 267 - 301 ; Jennifer Kilinski. International Climate Change Liability : A Myth or a Reality [ J ]. Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, 2009, (18) : 378 -416.
  • 5联合国国际法委员会编纂的《预防危险活动 的跨界损害草案》(2001).
  • 6《危险活动所致跨界损害的损失分配 原则草案》(2006).
  • 7《预防危险活动的跨界损害草案》第2条.
  • 8《危险活动所致跨界损害的损失分配原则草案》第2项.
  • 9Antonio Cassese. International Law [ M ]. 2nd ed. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2005 : 244.
  • 10国际法委员会《国家对国际不法行为的责任条款草 案》(2001)第1条和第2条.

二级参考文献7

  • 1那力,张炀.国际环境损害责任的私法化[J].当代法学,2004,18(4):113-119. 被引量:17
  • 2王曦.论“国际法未加禁止之行为引起有害后果之国际责任”[J].社会科学,2006(4):95-103. 被引量:14
  • 3[法]亚历山大·基斯 张若思编译.《国际环境法》[M].法律出版社,2000年版.第400页.
  • 4P. W. Birnie and A. E. Boyle, International Law and the Environnment, Oxford University Press, 2002, p. 178, p. 753,p. 754, p. 754.
  • 51972年斯德哥尔摩《人类环境宣言》第21—22条.
  • 6International Law Commission International Liability for Injurious Consequences Arising from Activities Not Prohibited by International Law: First Report on Legal Regime for Allocation of Loss in case of transboundary harm arising out of hazardous activites.p. 3.
  • 7Jutta Brunnee, Sense and Sensibility: Reflections on International Liability Regimes as Tools for Environment Protection, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Volume 53 ,Part 2, April 2004.

共引文献15

同被引文献182

引证文献11

二级引证文献177

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部