期刊文献+

咪达唑仑和氟哌利多在硬膜外麻醉术中的疗效对比

The effects comparison of midazolam and droperidol on epidural anesthesia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较咪达唑仑和氟哌利多在硬膜外麻醉术中的疗效。方法选择我院在硬膜外麻醉下行下肢或中下腹部手术的患者82例,随机分为咪达唑仑组(M组)和氟哌利多组(D组),硬膜外麻醉后分别给予静脉注射咪达唑仑0.04mg/kg和氟哌利多0.05mg/kg。比较两组血流动力学参数、呼吸、动脉血氧饱和度、镇静程度、术后遗忘及其他不良反应的发生率。结果与用药前比较,用药后两组患者MAP、HR、RR、SpO2均有不同程度的降低,T1(用药后5min)时MAP、HR、RR及SpO2最低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);与D组比较,两组在各时间点上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。用药后两组OAA/S评分较用药前明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组间在各时间点上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。M组完全遗忘、不全遗忘及无遗忘的发生率分别为78%、17.1%和4.9%,D组分别为12.2%、19.5%和68.3%。M组完全遗忘率显著高于D组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论咪达唑仑和氟哌利多均为用于硬膜外麻醉中安全有效的镇静药,但咪达唑仑独特的顺行性遗忘作用明显减少患者对手术的痛苦感受,其效果优于氟哌利多。 Objective To compare the effects of midazolam and droperidol on epidural anesthesia.Methods A total of 82 patients requiring epidural anesthesia were randomly assigned to two groups to receive midazolam group M or droperidol guoup D.After epidural anesthesia performed,midazolam(0.04mg/kg)and droperidol(0.05mg/kg) were injected intravenously in each group respectively.Comparison of two groups of parameters of hemodynamics,respiratory,arterial oxygen saturation,the degree of sedation,amnesia after operation and the incidence of adverse reactions.Results Compared with that before treatment,after treatment in two groups of patients with MAP,HR,RR,SpO2 were decreased in different dagree.T1(5 minutes after administration)MAP,HR,RR and SpO2 were minimun.Three were significant differences(P 〈0.05).Compared with D group,the two groups at each time point,the difference was not statistically significant(P 〉0.05).After administration of two groups of OAA/S score than before treatment was significantly lower,the difference was statistically significant(P 〈0.05),between the two groups at each time point were no statistical difference(P 〉0.05).Group M completely forgotten,not completely forgotten and no forgetting rate were 78%,17.1% and 4.9%,group D were 12.2%,19.5% and 68.3%.The group M was significant higher than group D in completely forgotten,the difference was statistically significant(P 〈0.01).Conclusion Midazolam and droperidol were used for epidural anesthesia is safe and effective sedation.But midazolam unique anterograde amnesia for the operation was significantly less in patients with painful feelings,better than the effect of droperidol.
作者 林斌 郭孝军
出处 《中国现代医药杂志》 2012年第8期54-56,共3页 Modern Medicine Journal of China
关键词 咪达唑仑 氟哌利多 硬膜外麻醉 顺行性遗忘 Midazolam Droperidol Epidural anesthesia Anterograde amnesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Kain ZN,Sevarino F, Alexander GM,et al. Preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain in women undergoing hysterectomy. A repeat -ed-measures design[J]. J Psychosom Hes,2000,49(6) :417-422.
  • 2叶媛,邬秀英,朱萍.咪达唑仑联合芬太尼静脉辅助硬膜外麻醉的临床观察[J].重庆医学,2011,40(2):153-154. 被引量:12
  • 3Twersky RS,Hartung J,Berger BJ,et al. Midazolam enhances anterograde but not retrograde amnesia in pediatric patients [J]. Anesthesiology,1993,78(1): 51-55.
  • 4Kwon MY,Lee SY,Kim TY,et al. Spectral entropy for assessing the depth of propofol sedation[J]. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology,2012,62(3) :234.
  • 5Kamata K, Hagihira S, Komatsu R, et al. Predominant effects of midazolam for conscious sedation : benefits beyond the early postoperative period[J]. J Anesth, 2010,24 (6) : 869-876.
  • 6Kasaba T. The effects of pentazocine,diazepam and midazolam in patients to reduce the uncomfortable feeling during epidural block procedure[J]. Masui, 1992,41 (11): 1806-1808.

二级参考文献13

  • 1刘存明,张国楼,王忠云,王灿琴,韩传宝,郝秀芬.咪唑安定辅助区域麻醉合适镇静深度及用量的探讨[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(1):20-22. 被引量:122
  • 2石玉岚,朱敏.咪达唑仑静注对呼吸抑制作用的观察[J].药物不良反应杂志,2005,7(1):20-22. 被引量:11
  • 3Berggren L, E riksson I, Mollenholt A, et al. Sedation for fibreop tie gastrocopy: a comparative study of midazolam and diazepam[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1983, 55 (4) : 289-296.
  • 4龚耀先.医学心理学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1998:97.
  • 5Stanley M. Anesthesia for the elderly Miller RD, Anesthe- sia[M]. 3rd ed. New York.. Churchill Livingstone, 1990: 1969-1984.
  • 6Thornton C, Barrowclifie MP, Konieczko KM, et al. The auditory evoked response as an indicator of awareness [J]. Br J Anaesth,1989,63(1) :113-115.
  • 7Schwender D, Kaiser A, Klasing S, et al. Mid-latency au- ditory evoked potentials and explitit and implicit memory in patients undergoing cardiac surgery[J]. Anesthesiolo- gy, 1994,81 (2) : 493-501.
  • 8Ghoneim MM, Robert I, Block RI, et al. The interactions of midazolam and flumazenil on human memory and cog- nition[J]. Anesthesiology, 1993,79(6) : 1183-1197.
  • 9Short TG, Plummer JL, Chui PT. Hypnotic and anaes- thetic interactions between midazdam, propofol and aL- fentanil[J]. Br J Anaesth. 1992,69(2) : 162-167.
  • 10岳云.麻醉与记忆[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2001,17(4):228-231. 被引量:36

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部