钱塘施耐庵与上海的鲁迅再辩——致马成生先生

The Rediscussion on Shi Nai'an of Qiantang and Luxun of Shanghai

马成生与浦玉生之间是"忘年交",就《水浒传》作者是"钱塘施耐庵"还是"白驹施耐庵",抑或二者合一,两人之间已经进行了三个回合的争鸣。本文认为马成生先生在水浒历史地理方面的疏漏可谓南北不分,方位颠倒,舛错百出,因此,马先生指责施耐庵的长江以北地理错误是不能成立的。20世纪80年代以来所谓《水浒传》的北方地理错误误导了不少专家学者,现在是正本清源的时候了。

Ma Chengsheng and Pu yusheng are in friendship between generations, both of them Have been de- bated three round of the question whether the author of Water Margin, Shi Nai＇ an of Qiantang, or Shi Nai＇ an of Baiju, or they both are one south, bearing upside down person. This paper thinks that Mr. Ma Chengsheng is regardless of the north and the and full of mistakes of historical and geographical omissions in Water Margin, therefore it is unsustainable that Mr. Ma accused Shi Nai＇ an of the geographical error of being in the north of Yangtze river. Since the 1980s the so - called north geographic mistakes of the author of Water Margin have misled a lot of experts and scholars, now is the right time to radically reform.