摘要
学科的研究方法与成果同等重要,研究之初其方法就已决定了成果的指向。人类学的经典著作,不仅可以作为现实研究的有效指导,其理论方法也值得我们借鉴、反思。文章以《西太平洋上的航海者》和《安达曼岛人》二书为例,通过马林诺夫斯基和布朗研究方法异同的比较,阐述一种民族志学的新研究范式。
Discipline research methods and results are equally important. At the start of the study, results have been decided by methods. Classics of anthropology, which are not only as a research guidance, but also worth using for reference and reflection. This paper will take Argonauts of the Western Pacific and The Andman Islanders as examples, through the comparison of similar- ities and differences of their research methods to shows the new research paradigm in ethnography.
出处
《重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版)》
2012年第4期38-41,共4页
Journal of Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
人类学
民族志
研究方法
anthropology
ethnography
research methods