期刊文献+

基于保留价格差异与通道费的竞争渠道结构 被引量:2

A Study on Competing Channels' Structure Based on Reservation Price Difference and Slotting Allowances
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究保留价格差异和通道费对3种竞争渠道均衡结果和均衡结构的影响,通过对格力和美的渠道结构选择进行案例分析来验证均衡结构的结论,比较了3种竞争渠道下的产品差异化、消费者剩余以及社会福利,最后,从成本差异和网络外部性2个角度对基本模型进行拓展。结论表明:当零售商收取较高通道费时,制造商将自建分销渠道或重新选择其他零售商;消费者剩余在II下最高,社会福利在DD下最低;普通品牌制造商能够通过降低产品成本削弱知名品牌的竞争优势;网络外部性将加剧市场竞争,降低渠道成员利润。 The paper investigates the effect of reservation price difference and slotting allowances on equilibriums and equilibrium structures of three competing channels. A case study is conducted to validate the conclusion about the equilibrium structures choice of Gree and Midea. Then, product differentiation, consumer surplus and social welfare of three competing channels structures are compared. The paper expands the basic model from two perspectives of cost difference and network externalities. The study shows that manufacturers will self-build distribution channel or reselect other retailers if slotting allowance is too high. Consumer surplus is highest in II, and social welfare is lowest in DD. Common brand manufacturer may weaken the competitive advantage of famous brand manufacturer through reduced product cost. Under network externalities, market competition will increase, and channel members' profits will reduce.
出处 《系统管理学报》 CSSCI 2012年第5期668-677,共10页 Journal of Systems & Management
基金 四川省科技支撑计划项目(2011SZ0228)
关键词 竞争渠道 保留价格差异 通道费 产品定位-定价策略 成本差异 网络外部性 competing channels reservation price difference slotting allowances product positioningpricing strategies cost difference network externalities
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1搜狐.超大连锁交恶供应商,格力渠道模式再度受到追捧[EB/OL].http://it.sohu.com/20110525/n280671912.shtml.2011-05-25.
  • 2McGuire T W, Staelin R. An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration [J] Marketing Science,1983, 2(2) .. 161-191.
  • 3Coughlan A T. Competition and cooperation inmarketing channel choice: theory and application[J]. Marketing Science, 1985, 4(2) : 110-129.
  • 4Moorthy K S. Strategic Decentralization in channels [J]. Marketing Science,1988, 7(4) :335-355.
  • 5Coughlan A T, Wernerfelt B. On credible delegation by oligopolists: A discussion of distribution channel management[J]. Management Science, 1989, 35 (2) 226-239.
  • 6Gupta S, Loulou R. Process innovation, product differentiation, and channel structure.. Strategic incentives in a duopoly[J]. Marketing Science,1998, 17(4) : 301-316.
  • 7Anderson E J, Bao Y. Price competition with integrated and decentralized supply chains [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 200 (1) : 227-234.
  • 8Xiao T J, Choi T M. Purchasing choices and channel structure strategies for a two-echelon system with risk-averse players [J]. International of Production Economics, 2009, 120(1): 54-65.
  • 9Wu D, Baron O, Berman O. Bargaining in competing supply chains with uncertainty[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 197(2) :548-556.
  • 10Lariviere M A, Padmanabhan V. Slotting allowances and new product introductions [ J ]. Marketing Science,1997, 16(2) : 112-128.

二级参考文献65

共引文献72

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部