期刊文献+

低温胁迫对水稻幼苗不同叶龄叶片叶绿素荧光特性的影响 被引量:52

Effects of chilling stress on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of seedling leaves with different leaf ages of Oryza sativa
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以‘蜀恢162’(‘Shuhui 162’)、‘糯89-1’(‘Nuo 89-1’)、‘蜀恢162/糯89-1’(‘Shuhui 162/Nuo 89-1’)、‘奇妙香’(‘Qimiaoxiang’)和早黄矮(‘Zaohuang’ai’)5个水稻(Oryza sativa L.)品种(系)为研究对象,采用叶绿素荧光成像系统研究了低温(4℃)胁迫对水稻3叶期幼苗不同叶龄叶片叶绿素荧光特性的影响。结果表明:经低温胁迫处理后,5个水稻品种(系)幼苗3个叶龄叶片的各叶绿素荧光参数变化有明显差异,其中第一叶的各项参数均降至0。经低温处理后5个水稻品种(系)幼苗3片叶片的PSⅡ最大光化学量子产量(Fv/Fm)均明显小于对照(25℃),其中第一叶的降低幅度最大、第三叶最小。经低温胁迫处理后,5个水稻品种(系)幼苗第三叶的非光化学淬灭系数(qN)均显著大于对照,耐冷性品种‘糯89-1’幼苗第二叶的qN较对照显著增大,而其他水稻品种(系)幼苗第二叶的qN均显著小于对照;‘糯89-1’幼苗第二叶的光化学淬灭系数(qP)较对照略有增大,第三叶的qP显著大于对照;‘早黄矮’幼苗第三叶的qP也大于对照但差异不显著,而其余水稻品种(系)幼苗第二叶和第三叶的qP均显著小于对照。经低温胁迫后5个水稻品种(系)幼苗3片叶片的PSⅡ最大相对电子传递速率(rETRmax)和半饱和光强(Ik)均显著小于对照;除‘糯89-1’幼苗第三叶外,5个水稻品种(系)幼苗3片叶片的快速光响应曲线初始斜率(α)也均显著小于对照,总体上第一叶的rETRmax、Ik和α下降幅度最大、第三叶最小。研究结果揭示:受低温胁迫后,叶片自身生理差异是导致水稻幼苗不同叶龄叶片受伤害程度不同的主要因素。 Taking five cultivars (lines) of Oryza sativa L. including ' Shuhui 162' , ' Nuo 89-1 ' , ' Shuhui 162/Nuo 89-1 ' , ' Qimiaoxiang' and ' Zaohuang' ai' as the research objects, the effect of chilling stress (4℃ ) on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of leaves with different leaf ages at three- leaf stage seedling was studied by chlorophyll fluorescence imaging system. The results show that after chilling stress, all of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of leaves with three leaf ages of five cultivars (lines) have obvious variations, in which, all parameters of the first leaf decrease to 0. After chilling stress, the maximal photochemical quantum yield of PS II (F/Fm) of three leaves of five cuhivars (lines) is obviously lower than that of the control (25 ℃ ), in which, decreasing range of Fv/Fm of the first leaf is the largest while that of the third leaf is the smallest. After chilling stress, non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) of the third leaf of five cultivars (lines) is significantly larger than that of the control. And qN of the second leaf of cold-resistance cuhivar ' Nuo 89-1 ' is significantly larger while that of other cuhivars (lines) is significantly smaller than that of the control. Comparing to the control,photochemical quenching coefficient (qP) of the second leaf of ' Nuo 89-1 ' increases slightly and that of its third leaf increases significantly after chilling stress, and that of the third leaf of ' Zaohuang' ai ' is also larger than that of the control bat without significant difference, while qP of the second and third leaf of other cuhivars (lines) is significantly smaller than that of the control. After chilling stress, the maximum relative electron transport rate of PS ]/ ( rETR ) and semi-saturation light intensity ( Ik ) of three leaves of five cultivars (lines) all are significantly smaller than those of the control. Except the third leaf of ' Nuo 89-1 ' , the initial slope of rapid light curve (α) of three leaves of five cultivars (lines) after chilling stress all are significantly smaller than that of the control. In general, the decrease range of rETR Ik and oL of the first leaf is the largest and that of the third leaf is the smallest. It is revealed that the self-physical difference of leaves is a main factor inducing to injury degree variation among different leaves with different leaf ages of O. sativa seedlings after chilling stress.
出处 《植物资源与环境学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期38-43,共6页 Journal of Plant Resources and Environment
基金 重庆市农业科学院基本科研业务费专项 重庆市重点攻关项目(CSTC2010AA1019) 重庆市博士后科研项目特别资助项目(渝xm201103002)
关键词 低温胁迫 水稻 叶片 叶龄 叶绿素荧光参数 chilling stress Oryza sativa L. leaf leaf age chlorophyll fluorescence
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1OLIVER S N, VAN DONGEN J T, ALFRED S C, et al. Cold- indueed repression of the rice anther-speeifie cell wall invertase gene OSINV4 is correlated with sucrose accumulation and pollen sterility [J]. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2005, 28: 1534-1551.
  • 2JEONG S W, CHOI S M, LEE D S, et al. Differential susceptibility of photosynthesis to light-chilling stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.) depends on the capacity for photochemical dissipation of light [ J ]. Molecules and Cells, 2002, 13: 419-428.
  • 3WOO N S, BADGER M R, POGSON B J. A rapid, non-invasive procedure for quantitative assessment of drought survival using chlorophyll fluorescence[J]. Plant Methods, 2008, 4: 27-40.
  • 4赵正武,王述民,李世平,严明建,雷树凡,吕直文,袁项成,冉彦秀.珍稀稻种资源越冬糯稻89-1研究初报[J].杂交水稻,2000,15(3):3-4. 被引量:6
  • 5PLATY T, GALLEGOS C L, HARRISON W G. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in natural assemblages of marine phytoplankton [ J ]. Journal of Marine Research, 1980, 38: 687-701.
  • 6EHLERT B, HINCHA D K. Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging ac- curately quantifies freezing damage and cold acclimation responses in Arabidopsis leaves[ J]. Plant Methods, 2008, 4: 12.
  • 7王国莉,郭振飞.低温对水稻不同耐冷品种幼苗光合速率和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J].中国水稻科学,2005,19(4):381-383. 被引量:87
  • 8SUZUKI K, NAGASUGA K, OKADA M. The chilling injury in- duced by high root temperature in the leaves of rice seedlings [ J ]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2008, 49: 433-442.
  • 9李平,李晓萍,陈贻竹,刘鸿先.低温光抑制胁迫对不同抗冷性的籼稻抽穗期剑叶叶绿素荧光的影响[J].中国水稻科学,2000,14(2):88-92. 被引量:34
  • 10GOVINDJEE R. Sixty-three years since Kautsky: chlorophyll a fluorescence[ J]. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 1995, 22 (2) : 131-160.

二级参考文献37

共引文献1628

同被引文献954

引证文献52

二级引证文献466

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部