开展兴趣小组和读书报告会在护理科研中的作用

Effect of hobby group and reader＇ s forum on nursing scientific research

目的探讨开展兴趣小组和读书报告会在护理科研中的作用。方法从2009年1月起在56名护士中开展兴趣小组和读书报告会活动，开展1年后由护士进行自我评价，包括对举办该活动必要性的认识以及在科研能力各方面的收获，统计比较培训前后各1年问护士撰写论文人数、撰写论文数、发表论文数、课题申报数及中标数。结果76．8％的护士认为举办该活动有必要，16．1％认为无所谓，仅7．1％认为没有必要。大多数护士科研论文阅读能力、写作能力、科研设计和实施能力较开展活动前有不同程度的提高（分别为96．4％，82．1％，80．4％和78．6％）。护士撰写论文人数、论文撰写篇数、论文发表数和课题申报数均较开展活动前显著增加[18（32．1％）比6（10．7％），22（39．3％）比7（12．5％），19（33．9％）比3（5．4％），5（8．9％）比0（0．0％）]（x2分别为7．636，10．469，14．481；P均〈0．05），课题中标数实现零的突破。结论开展兴趣小组和读书报告会可有效提高临床护士科研热情和科研水平。

Objective To study the effect of hobby group and reader＇ s forum on nursing scientific research. Methods From January 2009, hobby group and reader＇ s forum were held up among 56 nurses, and self-evaluation was conducted a year later, including the necessity of these activities and improvement in capacity of scientific research. The number of nurses who wrote papers, the number of papers, the number of papers being published, the number of application of research subjects and successful ones were compared before and after the training. Results 76.8% of the nurses believed it was necessary to have these activities, 16.1% thought it did not matter, and 7.1% thought there was no need. Most nurses made progress in their ability of reading scientific papers, writing, scientific research design and implement （96.4%, 82. 1%, 80.4%, and 78.6%, respectively）. The number of nurses who wrote papers, the number of papers, the number of papers being published, the number of application of research subjects increased significantly after the activities [18（32.1%） vs6（10.7%）,22（39.3%） vs7（12.5%）,19（33.9%） vs3（5.4%）, 5（8.9%）vs 0（0.0% ） ] （X2 = 7. 636, 10.469, 14. 481, respectively; P 〈 0. 05）. And papers which won subject bid successfully made a breakthrough from zero. Conclusions Hobby group and reader＇ s forum can effectively improve clinical nurses＇ research enthusiasm and ability.