期刊文献+

亲属法的伦理价值取向及其立法对策 被引量:2

On Ethical Values Orientation of Domestic Relations Law and its Legislative Responses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 亲属法的伦理价值取向是实现个体幸福与家庭和谐,属于富勒所言的"愿望的道德",是亲属法的法治理想。一方面我们应当将亲属法的伦理价值取向这一"愿望的道德"内化为"义务的道德",使之成为一种"内在道德";另一方面我们在设计权利义务条款时应当充分体现亲属法的伦理价值取向,应当弘扬婚姻家庭核心价值之功能,而不要使之成为法官判案的纯粹技术依据。《婚姻法》第4条以及《婚姻法司法解释(三)》有关房产的规定都值得深入检讨。 The ethical values orientation of Domestic Relations Law is the realization of individual happiness and family harmony which are aims of rules by law and the "morality of aspiration" Fuller said, The "morality of aspiration" that is the ethical values orientation of Domestic Relations Law should be turned into the "morality of duty" which makes it become a kind of "internal morality". We should therefore should fully emphasize the ethical values orientation of Domestic Relations Law in the design of provisions of rights and obligations, then promote the core values of married families rather than make this'a purely technical measure for judges to decide cases. The article 4 in Marriage Law and the provisions of real estate in the Judicial Interpretation (Three) of Marriage Law are worthy of in-depth review.
作者 曹贤信
出处 《河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期125-129,共5页 Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJC820004)
关键词 亲属法 伦理价值取向 内在道德 立法对策 domestic relations law ethical values orientation internal morality legislative responses
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1强世功.司法能动下的中国家庭——从最高法院关于《婚姻法》的司法解释谈起[J].文化纵横,2011(1):22-30. 被引量:75
  • 2赵晓力.中国家庭资本主义化的号角[J].文化纵横,2011(1):31-34. 被引量:83
  • 3刘云生.中西民法精神文化本源刍论[J].现代法学,2002,24(6):42-51. 被引量:12
  • 4亚里士多德.政治学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1983.30.
  • 5约翰·罗尔斯.正义论(修订版)[M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2009.
  • 6John Rawls. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement[M]. Cambridge MA,London:The Belknap Press of Harvard UniversityPress,2001:162.
  • 7Immanuel Kant. Critique of Practical Reason, trans, and ed. Mary Gregor, Cambridge.. Cambridge University Press, 1997 : 93.
  • 8宋希仁.中国伦理学百科全书·西方伦理思想史卷[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1993:408.
  • 9埃德蒙德·胡塞尔.伦理学与价值论的基本问题[M].北京:中国城市出版社,2002.45.
  • 10罗斯科·庞德.通过法律的社会控制[M].北京:商务印书馆,2008:35-38.

二级参考文献18

  • 1李贵连.话说“权利”[J].北大法律评论,1998(1):115-129. 被引量:34
  • 2包万超.儒教与新教:百年宪政建设的本土情结与文化抵抗[J].北大法律评论,1998(2):505-575. 被引量:12
  • 3姚新华.契约自由论[J].比较法研究,1997,11(1):21-34. 被引量:109
  • 4John Stuart Mill.Utilitarianism[]..1979
  • 5Sartori,G. The Theory of Democracy Revisited, Part One: The Contemporary Debate . 1987
  • 6Elazar Barkan.《 Guilt of Nations: Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices》[]..2000
  • 7John Locke,The Second Treatise on Government.Indianapolis[].Hackett.1983
  • 8Jean Jacques Rousseau,Donald A.Cress(trans.).On the Social Contract[]..1987
  • 9Baird,R.M.,Rosenbaum,S.E. Morality and the law . 1988
  • 10J.Rawls.A Theory of Justice[]..1971

共引文献482

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部