期刊文献+

采用重要度和模糊推理的数控刀架危害性分析 被引量:9

Criticality analysis for CNC turret adopting importance and fuzzy reasoning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以数控刀架系统为研究对象,基于美国国防部军用标准MIL-STD-1629A的故障模式、影响和危害性分析(FMECA)的思路,提出了一种改进的FMECA分析方法。该方法以重要度来判断严酷度,以专家权重评分数确定危害度,最后采用专家模糊推理进行危害水平的综合评估,有效地找出了影响刀架系统可靠性的薄弱环节,为对其进行可靠性改进设计以及制定合理的维修策略提供了科学依据。 Based on the most popular standard called MIL-STD-1629A from the U.S.Department of Defense,an improved FMECA method was presented to investigate the CNC turret.To avoid the ambiguity of subjective evaluation,the importance degree was used to judge severity,weighting factors of experts were introduced to determinate the criticality,and a fuzzy logic-based expert system was adopted to evaluate the risk level comprehensively.The weak link affecting turret system reliability was found out,which provides a scientific basis for improved design and maintenance policy.
出处 《吉林大学学报(工学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期1157-1162,共6页 Journal of Jilin University:Engineering and Technology Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51175222)
关键词 机床 重要度 权重因数 模糊推理 machine tool importance degree weighting factor fuzzy reasoning
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1张万谋.专业化生产是数控附件发展方向[J].中国机电工业,2004(9):19-20. 被引量:1
  • 2MIL-STD 1629A. Reliability-Centered Maintenance, US Dept of Defense 20301[S].
  • 3Assaf T,Dugan J B. Design for diagnosis using a diagnostic evaluation measure[J]. Instrumentation &Measurement Magazine, IEEE, 2006,9 (4) : 37- 43.
  • 4Lee Yun-Seong, Kim Dong-Jin, Kim Jin-O, et al. New FMECA methodology using structural importance and fuzzy theory[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,2011, 26(4) : 2364-2370.
  • 5Assaf T,Dugan J B. Automatic generation of diagnostic expert systems from fault trees [C]//Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium,2003 Annual. Tampa Florida, USA: IEEE Reliability Society, 2003.
  • 6陶勇剑,董德存,任鹏.采用故障树分析诊断系统故障的改进方法[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2010,42(1):143-147. 被引量:30
  • 7朱大奇,于盛林.基于故障树最小割集的故障诊断方法研究[J].数据采集与处理,2002,17(3):341-344. 被引量:115
  • 8Yang Zai-li, Bonsall Steve, Wang Jin. Fuzzy rulebased Bayesian reasoning approach for prioritization of failures in FMEA[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2008, 57(3):517-528.
  • 9Dong Yu-hua, Yu Da-tao. Estimation of failure probability of oil and gas transmission pipelines by fuzzy fault tree analysis[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2005, 18 (2):83- 88.
  • 10Tan J C, Crassley P A, Mclaren Y G. Fuzzy expert system for on-line fault diagnosis on a transmission network[J]. IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, 2001, 1(2):775-780.

二级参考文献14

  • 1盐见弘 岛冈淳 等.故障模式和影响分析与故障树分析的应用[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1987..
  • 2朱继渊.核反应堆安全[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,2000.150-152.
  • 3ASSAF T, DUGAN J B. Automatic generation of diagnostic expert systems from fault trees [ C ]//Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2003 Annual. Tampa Florida, USA: IEEE Reliability Society, 2003 : 143 - 147.
  • 4ASSAF T, DUGAN J B. Diagnostic expert systems from dynamic fault trees [ C ]//Reliability and Maintainability Annual Symposium-RAMS. Los Angeles, CA, Unites states: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2004:444-450.
  • 5ASSAF T, DUGAN J B. Diagnosis based on reliability analysis using monitors and sensors [ J ]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2008, 93 (4): 509 - 521.
  • 6REAY K A, ANDREWS J D. A fault tree analysis strategy using binary decision diagrams [ J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2002, 78 ( 1 ) : 45 - 46.
  • 7RAUZY A. New algorithms for fauh tree analysis [ J ]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1993, 40 (3) : 203 -211.
  • 8DU Suguo, SUN Yan. A novel ordering method of binary decision diagram [ C ]//International Conference on Management Science & Engineering. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2007 : 299 - 304.
  • 9TANG Z, DUGAN J B. Minimal Cut Set/Sequence Generation for Dynamic Fault Trees [ C]//Reliability and Maintainability Annual Symposium. Los Angeles, CA, Unites states: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2004 : 207 - 213.
  • 10ASSAF T, DUGAN J B. Design for diagnosis using a diagnostic evaluation measure [ J ]. Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, IEEE, 2006, 9 (4) : 37 -43.

共引文献140

同被引文献119

引证文献9

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部