期刊文献+

基于因子分析与聚类分析的交通事件自动检测算法融合 被引量:8

Automatic incident detection algorithms fusion method based on factor analysis and cluster analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对目前通常只利用一种交通事件自动检测算法进行事件检测导致的效果不佳问题,在对单个交通事件自动检测算法产生漏警和误警的原因进行分析的基础上,设计了一套与之相对应的交通条件在线评价指标,并以因子分析与聚类分析为手段提出了一种基于多个交通事件自动检测基本算法的决策级融合方法。运用某特大城市快速路感应线圈实测数据进行验证的结果表明,在交通事件自动检测基本算法的误警率为0.5%左右、检测率为63.5%~66.1%的条件下,所提出方法的检测率和误警率分别达到了90.6%和0.0981%,明显优于对比方法的检测效果。 For the improvement of the effect of incident detection using the single automatic incident detection algorithm(AIDA),a set of indexes used for traffic condition on-line evaluating was designed based on the analysis of the causes of failed alarms and false alarms generated by AIDAs used,and an AIDAs fusion method based on factor analysis and cluster analysis was developed.The proposed method was verified and compared using the data collected from the inductive loops on a metropolitan urban freeway.The results showed that under the condition of aimed false alarm rate 0.5% and the detection rates of the original AIDA 63.5 %~66.1%,the detection rate of proposed method is 90.6% and its false alarm rate is only 0.0981%,being obviously better than the contrast methods.
出处 《吉林大学学报(工学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期1191-1197,共7页 Journal of Jilin University:Engineering and Technology Edition
基金 '863'国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2009AA11Z218) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20110061110034)
关键词 交通运输系统工程 交通事件自动检测 信息融合 因子分析 聚类分析 engineering of communication and transportation system automatic incident detection information fusion factor analysis cluster analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1I.uk J Y K, Sin F Y C. The calibration of freeway incident detection algorithms [R]. Australian Road Research Board Working Document No. WD TE 92/ 001, ARRB, Vermont South, Victoria, 1992.
  • 2Chassiakos A, Stephanedes Y. Smoothing algorithms for incident detection[C]//Transportation Research Record 1394, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1993.
  • 3Thomas K, Dia H. Development and evaluation of fractal dimension models for freeway incident detection [J]. Road and Transport Research Journal, 2004, 13 (2): 2-20.
  • 4Han S I, Ritchie S G. Statistical and neural classifiers to detect traffic operational problems on urban arterialsEJ]. Transportation Research Part C, Emerging Technologies, 1998, 6(5): 291-314.
  • 5Stephanedes Y i, Hourdakis J. Transferability of freeway incident detection algorithms [C] // Transportation Research Record 1554, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1996.
  • 6Jin X, Cheu R L, Srinivasan D. Development and adaptation of constructive probabilistic neural network in freeway incident detection[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Techhologies, 2002, 10(2):121-147.
  • 7Zhou D S. An integrated traffic incident detection model[D]. USA, Austin: University of Texas Austin at Austin, 2000.
  • 8Lein L A. A Boolean algebra approach to multiple sensor voting fusion[J]. IEEE Trans, Aerospace and Electron Sys, 1993, 29(2) : 1-11.
  • 9Mak C L, Fan H S L. Algorithm fusion for detecting incidents on Singapore's central expressway[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2006, 132 (4) : 321-330.
  • 10薛薇.SPSS统计分析方法及应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2004..

二级参考文献3

共引文献299

同被引文献85

引证文献8

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部