期刊文献+

自陈式人格测验反应定势识别与控制技术探微 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 在团体性自陈式人格测验中,由于各种原因的存在经常会出现被试不配合测验的情况,严重影响测验的信度和效度。反应定势区分为社会希望性反应、掩饰、恶作剧式的认真回答、随机反应、规律性选择和空白选择等六种类型。对此,应对策略为事前控制和事后识别。事前控制技术主要包括:测验编制尽量采用经验量表策略,少采用理性量表策略;通过布局、造势的方法迫使被试配合测试。事后识别技术则主要是编制测谎量表:对于经验策略量表主要是检测是否存在空白题、随机反应和规律性选择;对于理性量表则主要是探查被试的作伪动机。特别需要指出是在事后识别技术中,适合于认知测验的反应时和IRT技术不适合团体性的自陈式人格测验作伪动机的检测。
作者 曹雪亮
出处 《西安政治学院学报》 2012年第4期61-63,共3页 Journal of Xi'an Politics Institute
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1凯温·R.墨菲,查尔斯·O.大卫夏弗.心理测验.原理和应用[M].上海.上海社会科学院出版社,2006.
  • 2骆方,张厚粲.人格测验中作假的控制方法[J].心理学探新,2007,27(4):78-82. 被引量:18
  • 3Kaplan R M. Psychological Testing. Principles, Applications, and Issues. Sixth Edition ed.北京.世界图书出版公司北京公司,2007.
  • 4Goffin R D, Christiansen N D. Correcting personality tests for faking. A review of popular personality tests and an initial sur- rey of researchers. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2003,11 ( 1 ).
  • 5骆方,刘红云,张杉杉.职业选拔情境下人格测验作假研究[J].心理科学进展,2008,16(5):803-809. 被引量:10

二级参考文献39

  • 1Nederhof A J. Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1985, 15 : 263 - 280.
  • 2Ellingson J E, Sackett P R, Hough L M. Social desirability corrections in personality measurement : Issues of applicant comparison and construct validity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999, 84:155 - 166.
  • 3Goffin R D, Christiansen N D. Correcting personality tests for faking: A review of popular personality tests and an initial survey of researchers. International Journal of Selection and Assessment,2003,11(! ) :340- 344.
  • 4Anderson C D, Warner J L, Spencer C C. Inflation bias in selfassessment examinations: Implications for valid employee selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69:574 - 580.
  • 5Zickar M J, Drasgow F. Detecting faking using appropriateness measurement. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1996, 20:71 - 87.
  • 6Ferrendo P J, Chico E. Detecting dissimulation in personality test scores: A comparison between person- fit indices and detection scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2001,61 : 997- 1012.
  • 7Ziekar M J, Gibby R E, Robie C. Uncovering faking samples in applicant, incumbent,and experimental data sets: An application of mixed - model Item Response Theory. Organizational Research Methods,2004,7(2) : 168 - 190.
  • 8Bowen C, Martin B A, Hunt S T. A comparison of ipsative and normative approaches for ability to control faking in personality questionnaires. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 2002,10(3):240-260.
  • 9Baron H. Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 1996,69( 1 ) : 49 - 57.
  • 10Dwight S A, Donovan J J. Do warnings not to fake reduce faking? Human Performance, 2003,16( 1 ) : 1 - 23.

共引文献21

同被引文献14

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部