期刊文献+

唐律误杀考 被引量:6

唐律误杀考
原文传递
导出
摘要 唐律中的误杀指行为人因其主观认识与客观情况不符而造成他人死亡的行为。误作为一种非故意而予以宽宥的形态在唐以前已非常固定,在唐代及后世文献的记载中没有实质变化。《唐律疏议》中误共出现190次,涉及到46条律文,其含义均涉及行为人的主观心态及责任形式。唐律中的误杀可分为起因于劫囚、窃囚、盗、斗殴、谋杀,以及疏忽大意所致的误杀六类。全面解析律文所列的具体误杀行为与刑罚的对应关系是研究唐律误杀的关键。 The word Wu (mistakenness) in the Code of Tang Dynasty refers to the deviation of the perpetrator's subjective recognition from the objective reality. Thus the term Wu Sha (mistaken killing) refers to a situation where the perpetrator's perception of the circumstances and the legal significance of his conduct is not in conformity to the objective reality, and where such deviation leads to the death of somebody. The meaning of Wu, as a non-intentional state of mind calling for mitigated punishment, had been quite fixed even before the Tang Dynasty, and remains substantially unchanged during and after that period of time. The word Wu appears 190 times in 46 articles of the Code of Tang Dynasty, and on all such occasions refers to the deviation of the perpetrator's subjective recognition from the objective reality and the correspondent legal liabilities. Wu Sha as appears in the Code of Tang Dynasty may be divided into 6 types, mistakenly killing somebody in publicly rescuing a prisoner, mistakenly killing somebody in covertly rescuing a prisoner, mistakenly killing somebody in stealing, mistakenly killing somebody in fighting, mistakenly killing somebody in murdering another, and negligently killing somebody. The relationship between the specific forms of mistaken killing and their correspondent penalties is a key point for the research of Wu Sha in the Code of Tang Dynasty.
作者 刘晓林
机构地区 甘肃政法学院
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期198-208,共11页 Chinese Journal of Law
关键词 唐律疏议 误杀 罪刑关系 The Code of Tang Dynasty, mistaken killing, crime and penalty
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1日本学者中村正人所撰《清律误杀初考》,载杨一凡总主编、[日]寺田浩明主编.《中国法制史考证》(丙编第4卷),中国社会科学出版社2003年版.
  • 2许道胜.张家山汉简《二年律令·贼律》补释[J].江汉考古,2004(4):86-90. 被引量:13
  • 3《贼盗》条(266).
  • 4《厩库》条(207).
  • 5《斗讼》条(328).
  • 6《斗讼》条(329).
  • 7《贼盗》条(287).
  • 8《名例》条(49).
  • 9蒋集耀.《中国古代魏晋律学研究》、穆宇.《张斐法律思想述评》,载何勤华编.《律学考》,商务印书馆2004年版,第95页,第148页.
  • 10《贼盗》条(294).

二级参考文献5

  • 1张家山二四七号汉墓竹简整理小组:《张家山汉墓竹简[二四七号墓]》,文物出版社,2001年11月版.
  • 2列为《二年律令》之首,律名单独写在54号简上.文中所引律文出自《张家山汉墓竹简[二四七号墓]》133-141页,不再分别标注页码,特此说明.
  • 3张家山汉简研读班:《张家山汉简〈二年律令〉校读记(上)》,载《简帛研究》网站,http://www.jianbo.org/Wssf/2003/zhangjiashan01.htm.下引此文,不另说明.
  • 4早稻田大学簡帛研究会:《張家山第二四七号漢墓竹簡訳注(二)》,载《简帛研究》网站,http://www.bamboosilk.org/admin3/html/shuijian03.htm.
  • 5王子今:《张家山汉简〈贼律〉"叚大母"释义》,载《简帛网站》http:∥fjt.infoscape.com.cn/gate/big5/www.bmy.com.cn/history/htdocs/XXLR1.ASP?ID=5333.

共引文献12

同被引文献54

引证文献6

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部