期刊文献+

普罗布考治疗高血脂非增生型糖尿病视网膜病变疗效观察 被引量:6

Probucol for non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy with hyperlipidemia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察普罗布考治疗高血脂非增生型糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的临床效果。方法临床确诊为高血脂非增生型DR的52例患者104只眼纳入研究。将患者随机分为普罗布考治疗组(治疗组)和对照组,分别为26例52只眼。给予两组患者饮食、运动指导的同时进行口服降糖药和(或)胰岛素强化治疗。治疗组在控制血糖、血压基础上给予普罗布考O.5g,2次/d;对照组在控制血糖、血压基础上口服阿托伐他汀10mg,1次/d。总疗程12个月。治疗前及治疗后1、3、6、12个月,所有患者均行视力、检眼镜、荧光素眼底血管造影、相关血液及尿液检查。对比观察治疗前后两组患者视力、眼底、黄斑水肿、甘油三酯(TG)、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDLC)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDLC)及8-羟基脱氧鸟苷(8-OHdG)的变化情况。结果治疗后治疗组、对照组视力预后总有效率分别为44.23%、40.38%,二者比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.335,P〉0.05)。治疗组、对照组视网膜出血及微动脉瘤均较治疗前减轻,其眼底预后总有效率分别为65.38%、36.54%,二者比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.973。P%0.05)。治疗组、对照组合并黄斑水肿分别为6、5只眼,均较治疗前显著减少,差异有统计学意义(X2=4.833、4.300,P%0.05);两组合并黄斑水肿眼数比较,差异无统计学意义(x2=0.102,P〉0.05)。治疗后12个月,治疗组(t=15.653、7.634、14.871)、对照组(t=13.275、7.415、13.632)TG、TC和LDLC均较治疗前有所降低,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);HDLC较治疗前无明显变化,差异无统计学意义(t=0.584、0.275,P〉0.05)。治疗组、对照组之间TG、TC、LDLC、HDLC比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=1.857、0.133、1.671、0.875,P〉0.05)。治疗后1、3、6、12个月,治疗组(t=7.352、15.581、27.324、28.143)及对照组(t=6.877、8.672、14.671、14.855)8-0HdG较治疗前呈逐渐降低趋势,差异有统计学意义(P%0.05)。治疗后1个月,治疗组及对照组8-0HdG比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.513,P〉0.05);治疗后3、6、12个月,治疗组8-OHdG较对照组降低,差异有统计学意义(t=3.434、5.917、5.226,P〈O.05)。结论普罗布考治疗高血脂非增生型DR可降低血脂、稳定视功能、减轻黄斑水肿。 [Abstract] Objective To observe the effectiveness of probucol for non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) with hyperlipidemia. Methods Fifty-two patients (104 eyes) of NPDR with hyperlipidemia were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, 26 patients (52 eyes) in each group. Both groups received diet and exercise guidance, oral hypoglycemic agents and (or) intensive insulin therapy. After blood sugar and blood pressure were controlled, the treatment group received probucol 0.5 g, two times per day; and the control group received atorvastatin of 10 mg, one time per day. The total course was 12 months. Before and after one, three, six and 12 months, all patients underwent vision, ophthalmoscope, fundus fluorescein angiography, blood and urine tested. Variations of visual acuity, fundus condition, macular edema, triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol ( TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( LDLC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) and 8-0HdG were observed before and after treatment. Results The total effective rate of visual prognosis were 44.23% and 40.38% in the treatment group and the control group, the difference had no statistical significacy (Z= 0. 335, P〈0.05). Retinal hemorrhages and microaneurysms alleviated after treatment in both groups. The total efficiency of fundus prognosis was 65.38% in the treatment group and 36.54% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (Z= -2. 973, P〉0.05). Maeular edema was in six and five eyes in the treatment group and the control group respectively, which were lower than before treatment, the difference was statistically significant (x2= 4.833, 4. 300; P〈 0. 05). Between the two groups, the difference was not statistically significant (x2 =0. 102, P〉 0. 05). Twelve months after treatment, TG, TC and LDLC were decreased in the treatment group (t= 15. 653, 7. 634, 14. 871) and control group (t = 13. 275, 7. 415, 13. 632), and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). HDLC showed no significant difference than before in the two groups (t= 0. 584, 0. 275; P2〉0.05). TG, TC, LDLC and HDLC showed no difference between the two groups (t= 1. 857, 0. 133, 1. 671, 0. 875; P〉0.05). 8-0HdG decreased gradually during the one, three, six and 12 months in the treatment group (t=7. 352, 15. 581, 27. 324, 28. 143) and control group (t=6. 877, 8. 672, 14. 671, 14. 855) after treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P%0.05). In the first month after treatment, 8-0HdG showed no difference between the two groups (t=0. 513, P〉0.05). In the 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment, the 8-0HdG was lower in the treatment group than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.434, 5.917, 5.226; P〈0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of NPDR with hyperlipidemia, probucol can reduce blood lipid, stable visual function and relieve macular edema.
出处 《中华眼底病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期477-481,共5页 Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases
基金 湖南省卫生厅课题(C2008-011) 湖南省科技计划项目(2009FJ3033) 诺美国际基金资助项目
关键词 糖尿病视网膜病变/药物疗法 高脂血症/药物疗法 普罗布可/治疗应用 Diabetic retinopathy/drug therapy Hyperlipidemias/drug therapy Probucol/ therapeutic use
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Brownlee M. Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications. Nature, 2001,414 : 813-820.
  • 2Dong QY, Cui Y, Chen L, et al. Urinary 8- hydroxydeoxyguanosine levels in diabetic retinopathy patients. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2008, 18:94-98.
  • 3Abbate M, Cravedi P, Iliev I,et al. Prevention and treatment of diabetic retinopathy: evidence from clinical trials and perspectives. Curr Diabetes Rev, 2011, 7 : 190-200.
  • 4Agardh E, Hultberg B, Agardh C. Effects of inhibition of glycation and oxidative stress on the development of cataract and retinal vessel abnormalities in diabetic rats. Curr Eye Res, 2000, 21 : 543-549.
  • 5陈忠平,张入铭,蒋苏平,刘江华.普罗布考治疗非增殖型糖尿病视网膜病变临床观察[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2010,18(7):552-555. 被引量:4
  • 6World Health Organization. Definition, diagnosis andclassification of diabetes mellitus and its complications Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Report of a WHO Consultation. Geneva: WHO, 1999:20-16.
  • 7中华医学会眼科学会眼底病学组.糖尿病视网膜病变分期标准[J].眼底病,1985,1:42-42.
  • 8中国成人血脂异常防治指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(5):390-419. 被引量:5222
  • 9张美霞,杨兰芬,罗成仁,严密,孟丹,沈齐,杜彩凤.糖尿病视网膜病变黄斑水肿的临床分析[J].中华眼底病杂志,2003,19(2):83-86. 被引量:26
  • 10段俊国,廖品正,吴烈,李毓敏,余杨桂,邱波,李传课.中药复方芪明颗粒治疗糖尿病视网膜病变双盲双模拟随机对照多中心临床研究[J].成都中医药大学学报,2006,29(2):1-5. 被引量:74

二级参考文献175

共引文献5518

同被引文献71

  • 1赵汝杰.高压氧辅治在老年糖尿病视网膜病变患者的应用效果[J].中国老年学杂志,2015,35(1):13-14. 被引量:5
  • 2唐仕波,李斌.应努力推动我国糖尿病视网膜病变的临床基础研究[J].中华眼底病杂志,2006,22(1):1-3. 被引量:26
  • 3邓金印,高汝龙,郦全福,等.52例糖尿病患者图形视诱发电位检测[J].中华眼底病杂志,1995,11(3):162-164.
  • 4Yang SH, Dou KF, Song WJ. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2010,352 ( 25 ) : 2425-2426.
  • 5Hong SC, Zhao SP, Wu ZH. Probueol up-regulates paraxonase 1 expression in hepatocytes of hypereholesterolemie rabbits [ J ]. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol,2006,47 ( 1 ) :77-81.
  • 6Iqbal M, Sharma SD, Okada S. Probucol as a potent inhibitor of oxygen radical-induced lipid peroxidation and DNA damage: in vitro studies[ J]. Redox Rep ,2004,9 ( 3 ) : 167-172.
  • 7A1-Aubaidy H, Jelinek H. Oxidative DNA damage and obesity in type 2 diabetes mellitus [ J] . Eur J Endocrnol,2011,164 ( 6 ) : 899 -904.
  • 8Zengi A, Ercan G, Caglayan O, Tamsel S, Karadeniz M, Simsir I, et al. Increased oxidative DNA damage in lean normoglycemic offspring of type 2 diabetic patients [ J ] . Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes ,2011,119 ( 8 ) :467471.
  • 9Endo K, Miyashita Y, Sasaki H, Ebisuno M, Ohira M, Salld A, et al. Probucol and atorvaas-tatin dcrease urinary 8-hydroxy-2-de- oxyguanosine in patients with diabetes and hypercholesterol- emia [ J ]. J Atheroscler Thromb ,2006,13 ( 1 ) :68-75.
  • 10Kaneto H, Kawamori D, Matsuoka TA, Kajimoto Y, Yamasaki Y. Oxidative stress and pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction[ J]. Am J Ther,2005,12 ( 6 ) : 529-533.

引证文献6

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部