海德格尔关于科学两种不同表述的内涵与统一性

The Unity And Connotation of Heidegger's Two Different Statements on Science

海德格尔关于科学"本质"的两个命题虽然在表述上大相径庭,但在理论内核和论证方法上具有内在统一性。从内容上看,1938年"科学的本质是研究"和1953年"科学是现实之物的理论"这两个具有代表性的命题蕴含了科学"对现实之物的干预性加工"、"方法对科学的胜利"以及科学"专业化"的必然性与积极方面,体现了海德格尔科学思想的深邃和丰富性的一面。从逻辑结构上看,这两个命题通过"对置性"(Gegenstndlichkeit)这一概念贯通起来,体现了其思想与方法论上"一致性"的一面。只有把这两个具有内在统一性的命题结合起来才能更加深入地把握"科学的本质"及其局限性。这两种论述基本上包含了海德格尔关于"科学"的其他命题。海德格尔认为,只有不迷恋确定性、严格性与客观性,立足于"存在的历史"和活生生的"此在的生存",才能更好地把握科学。

Though Heidegger＇s two propositions on ＂ the essence of science＂ are quite different literally, they are uniform inherently in theoret- ical core and reasoning method. From the content point of view, the two representative statements ＂the essence of science is study＂（in 1938） and ＂science is the theory of actual thing＂（in 1953） imply ＂science＇s intervening transformation on actual thing＂, ＂mathematical method＇s vic- tory to science＂ and the inevitability, positivity of science on specialization which reflect the depth and richness of Heidegger＇s thought on sci- ence. Judging from the logical structure, they coincide through the concept of ＂Gegenst？ ndlichkeit＂ what demonstrate Heidegger＇s consistency in science viewpoints and methodology. Only integrating the two internally unifying propositions can we grasp the essence and limitation of sci- ence more deeply. These two statements cover his other propositions on science basically. Heidegger believe that , only we do not madly cling to the certainty, stringency and objectivity, establish on the ＂history of Dasein ＂ and animated ＂da-sein＇s existence＂, can we understanding sci- ence more preferably.