克里普克是否破坏了语义金三角? 被引量：2

Did Kripke Violate the Semantical Golden Triangle?

导出

摘要分析性、必然性和先验性分属不同的哲学范畴,与之相对应的分别是意义、模态和理性。它们之间既相互区别,又相互联系,最终形成语义金三角关系。学界普遍的看法是,由于克里普克提出了"先验偶然命题"和"后验必然命题",从而打断了金三角的"康德之链",以致使得语义金三角遭到破坏。通过对克里普克的相关论证进行重新考量,可以得出结论:上述两类命题是不存在的,至少克里普克没有给出合适的例证,语义金三角是否遭到破坏还有待考证。 Analyticity, necessity and apriority belong to different philosophical categories, and what corresponds to them is meaning, modality and reason. These notions differ from and relate to each other, and are all important com- ponents of the semantic golden triangle. However, most philosophiers hold that because of the contingent a priori propositions and necessary a posteriori propositions suggested by Kripke, Kant＇ s link in the golden triangle was bro- ken, therefore, this golden triangle was violated. Through the reexamination of Kripke＇ s related arguments, we can draw the conclusion that there are no such propositions as suggested by Kripke, at least he did not give proper exam- ples to illustrate his ideas. Whether the semantic golden triangle has been violated is to be proved.

作者刘东

机构地区中国人民大学哲学院

出处《科学技术哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期20-25,共6页 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology

基金中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目"二维模态逻辑及其哲学问题研究"(12XNH190)

关键词语义金三角先验偶然命题后验必然命题二维语义理论 the semantic golden triangle contingent a priori propositions necessary a posteriori propositions theoryof two - dimensional semantics

分类号 N02 [自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1康德.纯粹理性批判[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.250,251.
2Ayer A J. Language, Truth and Logic [ M ]. New York : Dover Publications, 1952:78.
3Kripke S. Naming and Necessity [ M ]. Oxford: Basil Black- well, 1980.
4格雷林.逻辑哲学引论[M].牟博,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1990.
5Chalmers D. Epistemic Two - Dimensional Semantics [ C ]/! Philosophical Studies:An International Journal for Philosho- phy in the Analytic Tradition. The Two - Dimensional Framework and Its Applications : Metaphysics, Language andMind, 2004,118 ( 1/2 ).
6Chalmers D. The Foundations of Two - Dimensional Seman- tics [ G ]//Garcia - Carpintero M, Macia J. Two - Dimen- sional Semantics. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2006.
7Frege G. On Sense and Nominatum [ G]//Martinich A P. The Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press ,2001 : 199 - 211.
8弗雷格.弗雷格哲学论著选辑[G].王路,译.北京:商务印书馆,2006:97.
9皮亚杰．可能性与必然性[M]．熊哲宏，译．上海：华东师范大学出版社，2005：2．
10惠继红.必然性、先验性和分析性与二维语义理论[J].自然辩证法通讯,2011,33(1):7-13. 被引量：4

二级参考文献21

1奎因.从逻辑的观点看[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1987..
2[8]A·C·格雷林.哲学逻辑引论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1990.
3[1]Zalta,N Edward."Further Explanation of the Objectives of the Theory[EB/OL] from http://mally.stanford.edu/objectives.html.2004-06-12
4[3]Chalmers,J David.The Foundations of Two-Dimensional Semantics[C]// in Two-Dimensional Semantics:Foundations and Applications.M.Garcia-Caprintero and J.Macia,eds,Oxford:Oxford University Press,2004.96-101.
5[4]克里普克.命名与必然性[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2005.
6Kripke, Saul. "Identity and Necessity", in M. K. Munitz (ed.): Identity and Individuation, New York University Press, 1971, pp. 135-164.
7Reprinted in A. W. Moore (ed.) Meaning and Reference, Oxford University Press, 1993, pp. 162-191.
8Kripke, Saul. Naming and Necessity, Paperback Edition, Oxford, UK: Blaekwell Publishing, 1981.
9Dummett, Michael. Frege: Philosophy of Language (New York, NY: Harper & Row, Second edition, 1981), p. 116.
10Audi, Robert (ed.) : The Cambridge Dictionary of Philoso phy, Cambridge University Press, 1995, p. 29.