期刊文献+

谓词抽象:一种新型语言辖域装置 被引量:1

Predicate Abstraction: A New Linguistic Mechanism of Scope
原文传递
导出
摘要 自然语言歧义所产生的哲学问题在语言哲学史上占据着重要位置。罗素的摹状词理论中包含着一种基于经典逻辑的语言辖域装置,它解决了"排中律失效"问题。作为一种基于量化模态逻辑的新型语言辖域装置,谓词抽象可以解决包括奎因的"指称晦暗语境"以及"信念之谜"在内的模态逻辑语境下的语言歧义问题。在问题的适用域上,谓词抽象优越于罗素的辖域装置。谓词抽象还有着广阔的哲学应用前景和进一步的研究价值。 The philosophical puzzles resulted from the linguistic ambiguity of scope play an important role in the his- tic mechanism of scope based on classical logic in Russell' s theory of description, which solves the puzzle of "law of excluded middle". As a new linguistic mechanism of scope based on the quantified modal logic,the predicate abstraction can be used to solve Quine' s puzzle of referentially opaque context and the Belief Puzzle. As for the range of applicable questions,the predicate abstraction is larger than Rus- sell' s mechanism of scope. The predicate abstraction has a bright prospect in philosophy.
作者 魏燕侠
出处 《科学技术哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期47-52,共6页 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基金 2011教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(11YJC720044) 2011年度福建省高校杰出青年科研人才培育计划项目(11FJPY06) 2009年度福建省社会科学规划一般项目(2009B2051) 华侨大学高层次引进人才项目(08BS501)
关键词 谓词抽象 语言歧义 辖域装置 摹状词 predicate abstraction linguistic ambiguity mechanism of scope descriptions
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1蒉益民.从弗雷格之谜及信念之谜看心灵内容与语义内容的关系[J].世界哲学,2006(6):82-87. 被引量:11
  • 2McGlone M. Understanding Kripke' s Puzzles about Belief [ J ]. Philosophy Compass,2009,4 (3) :487.
  • 3[ Russell B. The Philosophy of Atomism [ M ]. London: Rout- ledge, 2009 : 2.
  • 4Wedin M. Negation and Quantification in Aristotle [ J ]. His- tory and Philosophy of Logic, 1990,11 (2) : 131 - 150.
  • 5Russell B. On Denoting [ J ]. Mind, 1905,14 (56) :485.
  • 6Quine W. Reference and Modality[ C ]//From a logical point of view. Harvard: Harper & Row Publishers, 1963 : 139.
  • 7Kripke S. A Puzzle about Belief[ C]//Margalit A Meaning and Use. Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel, 1979:239 - 283.
  • 8Whitehead A, Russell B. Principia Mathematica [ M ]. Cam- bridge, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press ( second edi- tion) ,1925,1:181 - 195.
  • 9Ramsey F. The Foundation of Mathematics [ M ]. London : Routledge & Kegan, 1931:263.
  • 10Kripke S. Naming and Necessity [ M ]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1972:27.

二级参考文献14

共引文献19

同被引文献12

  • 1Robert Shope, The Analysis of Knowing, A Decade of Research, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.
  • 2[美]约翰.波洛克、乔.克拉兹.《当代知识论》,陈真译,上海:复旦大学出版社,2008年,第17页.
  • 3Vincent F. Hendricks, Mainstream and Formal Epistemology, Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp.4-5.
  • 4Jaakko Hintikka, Knowledge and Belief: an Introduction to The Logic of The Two Notions, Cornell University Press,1962,p.4.
  • 5Saul Kripke,Naming and Necessity, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980, p.48.
  • 6Bertrand Russell, The Philosophy of Atomism^ London: Routledge, 2009, p.2.
  • 7Roderick M. Chisholm, Theory of Knowledge , 2nd Ed, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall,cl977.
  • 8Alvin I. Goldman, “Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge”,Journal of Philosophy, 1976,pp.771-791.
  • 9Black Skyrms, “The Explication of 'X Knows that p,”,Journal of Philosophy, 1967, pp.373-389.
  • 10Stephen Hetherington, “Gettier Problems”,The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2005, pp.1-23.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部