二语学习者“词汇质量”对接收型语言技能的影响研究被引量：5

The effect of “lexical quality” on L2 learners' receptive skills

导出

摘要目前,关于阅读与听力技能的研究日益增多,其依据的语言理论不一而足,研究对象也不尽相同。但在Perfetti的"词汇质量假设"框架下,探讨各词汇技能成分对接收型语言技能的影响较少受到学者关注。鉴于此,本文借助相关分析和分层回归分析,以英语专业学生为受试,探讨词汇的语音/正字法/语义加工能力对阅读技能与听力技能的影响以及它们之间的互动。结果发现:词汇的"语义加工能力"等高层次加工能力随着二语学习者语言水平的提高而对阅读/听力技能的影响日益增强,而词汇的"语音加工能力"等低层次加工能力的作用则随之降低。但与对阅读技能的作用比较,"语音加工能力"对听力技能的影响下降较为缓慢。 Various studies focusing on reading and listening skills have been conducted in different theoretical frameworks, with school children or college students as participants. However, the effect of what Perfett calls 'lexical quality' on receptive skills seems to have received scanty attention. The present study, through correlation analysis and hierarchical regression analysis and with Chinese English-major college students as participants, explores the possible impact of phonological, orthographic, and semantic processing of lexes on L2 learners' reading and listening skills. It finds that as L2 learners' language proficiency gradually develops a high-level lexical component skill like semantic processing plays an increasingly more important role in affecting the participants' reading and listening skills, whereas the effect of a low-level skill like phonological processing weakens in the process. In addition, phonological processing exerts a greater influence on listening skill than on reading skill.

作者吴建设施海琦郎建国王晓华

机构地区北京第二外国语学院

出处《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期682-693,800,共12页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research

基金教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"中国英语学习者词汇习得与认知神经研究"(11YJC740112) 北京市教委人文社会科学研究计划面上项目"中-英-韩/西三语习得者的跨语言迁移研究"(SM201010031001) 北京市属高校人才强教深化计划中青年骨干人才(PHR201108165)部分资助北京第二外国语学院"理论语言学与应用语言学基地"资助

关键词词汇质量假设阅读技能听力技能

分类号 H09 [语言文字—语言学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献47

1Anderson, R. & P. Pearson. 1984. A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension [A]. In P. Pearson Ced.). Handbook of Reading Research [C]. New York: Longman. 255-291.
2Carver, R. 1977. Toward a theory of reading comprehension and rauding [J]. Reading Re-search Quarterly 3: 8-63.
3Cunningham, A. &K. Stanovich. 1990. Assessing print exposure and orthographic process-ing skill in children: A quick measure of reading experience [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 733-740.
4Durgunoglu, A., W. Nagy&B. Hancin-Bhatt. 1993. Cross-language transfer of phonologi-cal awareness [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology 85: 453-465.
5Flowerdew, J. 1994. Research relevance to second language lecture comprehension - An overview [A]. In J. Flowerdew C ed. ). Academic Listening: Research Perspectives [C]. Cambridge: CUP. 7-29.
6Flowerdew , J. &L. Miller. 2005. Second Language Listening: Theory and Practice [M]. Cambridge: CUP.
7Gernsbacher, M. 1990. Language Comprehension as Structure Building [M]. Hillsdale, N. J. : Earlbaum.
8Goodman, K. 1967. Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game [J]. Journal of the Reading Specialist 6: 126-135.
9Gough, P. 1985. One second of reading [A]. InH. Singer&R. Ruddell. (eds.): Theoret-ical Models and Processes of Reading [C]. Newark, DE. : International Reading Associ-ation. 661-688.
10Graesser, A. 2007. An introduction to strategic reading comprehension [A]. In D. McNa-mara (ed.). Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technol-ogies. [C] Mahwah, N.J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 3-26.