期刊文献+

地震危险性分析方法探讨 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 东日本大地震发生之后,我国对地震事件对核电站的影响倍加重视,决定开展地震PSA研究,其中危险性分析是地震PSA研究中最重要的工作之一。本文介绍了地震危险性分析方法的四个步骤:震源评价、地震重现、衰减关系确定以及危险性曲线的确定方法;分析了不确定性分析方法和一致危险性谱,探讨了危险性分析中存在的问题。危险性分析方法是成熟的,在分析过程中存在较大的不确定性,需正确看待和理解。
出处 《中国科技信息》 2012年第18期34-35,共2页 China Science and Technology Information
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Cornell, C.A. (1968), “Engineering Seismic Risk. Analysis, ” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 58,pp. 1583-1606.
  • 2ANS IEEE “PRA Procedures Guide : A Guide to the Performance of Probabilistic Risk Assessments for Nuclear Power Plants” NUEEG/CR 2300 January 1983.
  • 3EPR! (2003) “Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment Implementation Guide,15 EPR1 1002989, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, California, December 2003.
  • 4Gutenberg, B, , and C. F. Richter, 1942. "Earthquake Magnitude, Intensity, Energy and Acceleration,11 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 32,pp. 1 63-191 .
  • 5Kramer, S. L. (1996), “Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, ,, Prentice-Hall,Inc., New Jersey, 1996.
  • 6USGS(2008), Documentation for the 2008 Update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps.
  • 7REI (2001), “Technical Basis for Revision of Regulatory Guidance on Design Ground Motions: Hazard- and Risk- Consistent Ground Motion Guidelines,” NUREG/CR-6728, USNRC, Risk Engineering, Inc. , October 2001 .
  • 8EPRI (1989), Probabilistic Hazard Evaluation at Nuclear Plant Sites in the Central and Eastern United States,Resolution of the Charleston Issue, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: April 1989. NP-6395-D.
  • 9NEA(1997), ” State-of-the-Art Report on the Current Status of Methodologies for Seismic PSA”,NEA/CSNI(97)22,Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, March 1 998.
  • 10LLNL (1989), tlSeismic Hazard Characterization of 69 Nudear Plant Sites East of the HocKy Mountains,” NUREG/CR-5250, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, January 1989.

同被引文献37

  • 1蔡逢春,叶献辉,刘文进.核电厂构筑物和设备高置信度低失效概率抗震能力值的计算方法[J].核动力工程,2013,34(S1):152-156. 被引量:7
  • 2USNRC. Reactor Safety Study. WASH 1400, NUREG-73/041, 1975.
  • 3Zion. Zion Probabilistic Safety Study. Prepared by Pickard, Lowe and Garrick, Inc. for Commonwealth Edison Company, 1981.
  • 4USNRC. Seismic Safety Margins Research Program, Phase I Final Report, SMACS-Seismic Methodology Analysis Chain with Statistics (Project VIII). NUREG/CR-2015, Vol. 1-9, 1981.
  • 5SNRC. Severe Accident Risk, An Assessment of Five US Nuclear Power Plants. NUREG-1150, Vol. 1-2, 1990.
  • 6ANS-IEEE. PRA Procedures Guide: A Guide to the Performance of Probabilistic Risk Assessments for Nuclear Power Plants. NUREG/CR-2300, 1983.
  • 7USNRC. Policy Statement on Severe Accidents. Federal Register, Vol. 50, 32138, 1985.
  • 8Prassinos P G, Ravindra M K, Savy J D. Recommendations to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Trial Guidelines for Seismic Margin Reviews of Nuclear Power Plants. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, NUREG/CR-4482, 1986.
  • 9EPRI. A Methodology for Assessment of Nuclear Power Plant Seismic Margin. EPRI NP-6041, EPRI, Palo Alto, California, 1988.
  • 10PG&E. Final Report of the Diablo Canyon Long Term Seismic Program. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Docket 50-275 and 50-323, 1988.

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部