图书馆社会价值评估方法研究被引量：2

Social Value Assessment Method of Library

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文介绍国内外图书馆评估的现状,分析各领域社会价值成熟的评估方法,阐明了我国图书馆社会价值评估的目的和前提,总结图书馆社会价值评估专门的研究方法。 This article describes the status of the assessment of library at home and abroad, analyzes mature assessment methods for the social values in various fields, sets out purpose and premise of the assessment for the social value of library in China, and concludes the specialized research methods.

作者张丽

机构地区西安图书馆读者服务部

出处《价值工程》 2012年第27期266-268,共3页 Value Engineering

关键词图书馆社会价值评估方法体系 library assessment of social value methodology

分类号 G250 [文化科学—图书馆学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献6

1徐中民,任福康,马松尧,郭庭天.估计环境价值的陈述偏好技术比较分析[J].冰川冻土,2003,25(6):701-707. 被引量：15
2王少豪．企业价值评估[M]．北京：中国水利水电出版社．2005．
3毛赣鸣.图书馆无形资产评估[J].情报资料工作,2004,25(1):59-62. 被引量：16
4Throsby D. Determining the value of cultural goods: how much (or how little) does contingent valuation tell us? Journal of Cultural Economics, 2003,27(3):275-280.
5Lovett A, Batemen I J. Economic analysis of environmental preferences: Process and prospects. Computer, Environment and Urban systems, 2001,25(2):131-136.
6[2007-12-01 ].http://www.economist.icxo.com/htmlnews/2007/ 03/02/lO09245.htm.

二级参考文献19

1(美)罗伯特·F 赖利罗伯特 P 施韦斯著.无形资产评估[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,2001..
2[1]Loomis J B, Walsh R G. Recreation Economic Decisions:Comparing Benefits and Costs (2nd edition) [M]. Pennsylvania: Venture Publishing Inc. , 1997.
3[2]Bateman I J, Willis K G. Valuing Environmental Preferences:Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
4[8]Mitchell D C, Carson R T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods, the Contingent Valuation Method [M]. Washington D C: Resources for the Future, 1989. 85-102.
5[9]Loomis J B. Environment valuation techniques in water resource decision making [J]. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 2000, (12): 339-344.
6[10]Loomis J B. Measuring the economic benefits of removing dams and restoring the Elwha River: results of a contingent valuation survey [J]. Water Resources Research, 1996, 32(2):441-447.
7[11]Loomis J B, Kent P, Strange L, etal. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey [J].Ecological Economics, 2000, 33: 103-117.
8[12]Hanemann W M, Kanninen B. The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data [R]. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California at Berkeley.Working Paper No. 798. 1996. 3-15.
9[13]Bennet J, Russell B. The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation [M]. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing Inc, 2001. 37-69.
10[14]Adamowicz W, Boxall P, Williams M, etal. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experi ments and contingent valuation [J]. American Journal of Agriculture Economics, 1998, 80: 64-75.