期刊文献+

病态窦房结综合征伴房室传导延迟AAI与DDD起搏模式右心功能的超声评价 被引量:1

Echocardiography in evaluating right ventricular function of patients with sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular delay with perianal abscesson under AAI and DDD pacing modes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨AAI与DDD起搏模式下病态窦房结综合征伴房室传导阻滞患者的右心功能。方法 35例病态窦房结综合征伴Ⅰ度房室传导阻滞植入DDD双腔起搏器患者,先用程控仪将起搏器程控为DDD模式,最后程控为AAI模式。超声心动图检测患者2种起搏模式下的各参数变化情况。结果 DDD起搏模式下的RVPEP、RVPEP/RVET、Sm、Tei指数明显高于AAI起搏模式(P<0.05),E/Em低于AAI起搏模式(P<0.05)。结论 AAI起搏模式右心的收缩和舒张功能均优于AV间期优化的DDD起搏模式。 Objective To explore the right ventricular function of patients with sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular delay under AAI and DDD pacing modes.Methods Thirty-five sick sinus syndrome combined with Ⅰ degree atrioventricular block implantation of DDD patients with dual chamber pacemaker were included in the study.The program-controlled instrument was used to change the pacemaker to DDD mode first,and then to AAI mode.Echocardiography was employed to detect parameter changes of patients with two kinds of pacing mode.Results RVPEP RVPEP/RVET and Sm,Tei index of DDD pacing mode were significantly higher than those of AAI pacing mode(P〈0.05).The E/Em of DDD pacing mode was less than that of AAI pacing mode(P〈0.05).Conclusion The right cardiac systolic and diastolic function of the patients with AV is better under the AAI mode pacing mode than under the DDD mode pacing mode.
出处 《实用临床医药杂志》 CAS 2012年第15期14-16,共3页 Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
关键词 房室传导阻滞 窦房结综合征 心功能 起搏器 atrioventricular block sinus syndrome cardiac function pacemaker
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献21

  • 1赵福海,韩明华,赵玲,李淑敏.AAI与DDD起搏方式对患者心功能的影响[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2005,19(3):178-178. 被引量:3
  • 2Kainz W. Sick sinus syndrome indication: AAI/R versus DDD/R. Wien Med Wochenschr, 2000, 150(19-21): 407-409.
  • 3Dretzke J, Toff WD, Lip GYH, et al. Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2, 2009.
  • 4Matthijs FM, Frits WP, TheoA, et al. Asynchronous electrical activation induces asymmetrical hypertrophy of the left ventricular wall. Circulation, 1998, 98: 588-595.
  • 5Albertsen AE, Nielsen JC, Poulsen SH, et al. DDD(R)-pacing, but not AAI(R)-pacing induces left ventricular desynchronization in patients with sick sinus syndrome: tissue-Doppler and 3D echocardiographic evaluation in a randomized controlled comparison. Europace, 2008, 10(2): 127-133.
  • 6Bernhard S, Kindermann M, Schatzer-Klotz D, et al. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2001, 24(11): 1585-1595.
  • 7Kristensen L, Nielsen JC, Mortensen PT, et al. Incidence of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in a randomised trial of atrial versus dual chamber pacing in 177 patients with sick sinus syndrome. Heart, 2004, 90(6):661-666.
  • 8Nielsen JC, Bottcher M, Nielsen TT, et al. Regional myocardial blood flow in patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to long-term single chamber atrial or dual chamber pacing--effect of pacing mode and rate. JAm Coll Cardiol, 2000, 35(6):1453-1461.
  • 9Nielsen JC, Kristensen L, Andersen HR, et al. A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome. JAm Coil Cardiol, 2003, 42(4):614-623.
  • 10Knebel F,Reibis RK,Bondke H,et al.Tissue Doppler echocardiography and biventricular pacing in heart failure:patient selection,procedural guidance,follow-up,quantification of success[J].Cardiovasc Ultrasound,2004,2(1):17-30.

共引文献18

同被引文献18

  • 1St John Sutton M, Plappert T, Adamson PB, et al. Left Ventrieular reverse remodeling with biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block and heart failure in the BLOCK HF trial [J]. Cite Heart Fail, 2015,8 (3): 5111-518.
  • 2Rimbas RC, Margulescu AD, Siliste C, et al. Left ventricular strain analysis reveals better synchrony and diastolic function for septal versus apical right ventricular permanent pacing [J]. Maedica ( Buchar), 2014,9 ( 3 ) : 232-241.
  • 3Matsuoka K, Nishino M, Kato H, et al. Right ventricular apical pacing impaires left ventricular twist as well as synchrony:acute effects of right ventricular apical pacing [J]. J Am Soc Eehocardiogr, 2009,22(8) :914-919.
  • 4Sohinki D, Obel OA. Newer algorithms in bradycardia management [J]. Cardiol Clin, 2014, 32 ( 2 ) : 283-292.
  • 5Tanaka H, Hara H, Adelstein EC, et al. Comparative mechanical activation mapping of RV pacing to LBBB by 2D and 3D speckle tracking and association with response to resynchronization therapy [J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2010, 3 (5) : 461-471.
  • 6Gillebert C, Marynissen T, Janssen R, et al. How to choose between a pacemaker or defibrillator for resynchronization therapy? [J] Acta Cardiol, 2014,69(5) : 483-489.
  • 7Sengupta PP, Tajik AJ, Chandrasekaran K, et al. Twist mechanics of the left ventricle: principles and application [J]. JACC Cardiovase Imaging, 2008, 1 (3) :366-376.
  • 8Notomi Y, Popovie ZB, Yamada H, et al. Ventrieular untwisting : a temporal link between left ventrieular relaxation and suction [J]. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2008, 294 ( 1 ) : H505- H513.
  • 9Haberka M, Liszka J, Kozyra A, et al. Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography prognostic parameters in patients after acute myocardial infarction [J]. Echocardiography, 21)15,32 (3) :454-460.
  • 10Borg AN, Harrison JL, Argyle RA, et al, Left ventricular torsion in primary chronic mitral regurgitation[J]. Heart, 2008,94 (5) : 597-603.

引证文献1

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部