期刊文献+

我国台湾地区消费集团诉讼制度及其启示 被引量:4

Taiwan's Legal framework about Consumer Class Lawsuit System and Its Enlightenment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代的消费市场,因消费纠纷而涉及诉讼的,大多数属于集团诉讼,依据我国大陆(下称大陆)现行法律,消费者维权方面出现了立法上的不足,难以落实对消费权益的保护。通过引述我国台湾地区相关立法的框架及其内涵,分析了该制度是一种新型的维权制度,且表述该制度对消费者的意义。通过论证认为,我国大陆有必要构建消费集团诉讼。 In modern consumer market, most of the litigations concerned due to the consumption's dispute are of the class lawsuits. According to the relative laws in Mainland of China, it appears obviously that the relative regulations regarding the consumer protection aren't enough. Under this circumstance, it is unable to protect the consumers' right. From this issue, the author explores Taiwan's legal framework about the consumer class lawsuit system and its' contents firstly; then analyses that the consumer class lawsuit system is a new system of the rights protection; and also expresses that this system is of significance for the consumers. It is conclusive that the system could be constructed for China's revelation.
作者 谢绍芬
机构地区 南京大学法学院
出处 《北京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2012年第4期58-63,共6页 Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 消费者 集团诉讼 消费者权益 consumer class lawsuit system consumer protection
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1周婷玉.卫生部通报问题奶粉情况:29万余名婴幼儿泌尿系统出现异常[N].人民日报(海外版),2008-12-02(4).
  • 2张守文.经济法学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2007.
  • 3林益山.消费者保护法[M].中国台北:五南图书出版股份有限公司,2008.
  • 4于亮.在消费者权益保护领域建立公益诉讼制度[J].法制与经济(中旬),2009(7):68-69. 被引量:3
  • 5纪文惠.商品制造人责任保险契约之研究[D].中国台北:台湾大学法学院,2004:17.
  • 6杨丽炎.群体诉讼研究[D].上海:复旦大学法学院,2007:14-20.
  • 7薛永慧.群体诉讼之比较[J].社会科学家,2010,25(3):73-75. 被引量:2
  • 8严运秋.公益经济诉讼:经济法诉讼体系的建构[D].武汉:中南大学商学院,2006:47-49.
  • 9卡多佐.司法过程的性质[M].苏力,译.北京:商务印书馆,2000:44.
  • 10王维国.公共性理念的现代转型极其困境[R].北京:中国人民大学博士后研究报告,2004:76-77.

二级参考文献25

  • 1李春玲.各阶层的社会不公平感比较分析[J].湖南社会科学,2006(1):71-76. 被引量:41
  • 2Konow, J. (2001). “Fair and Square: The Four Sides of Distributional Justice.” Journal of economic behavior and organization 46(2) : 137 - 64.
  • 3Mikula, G. (1980). "On the Role of Justice in Allocation Decisions". Justice and Social Interaction. G. Mikula. New York, Springer-Verlag: 127- 165.
  • 4Rutstrom, E. and M. B. Williams ( 2000 ). “Entitlements and Fairness: An Experimental Study of Distributive Preferences.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 43 : 75 - 89.
  • 5阿马蒂亚·森.《论经济不平等》.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006年版,第1页.
  • 6Babcock, L. and G. Loewenstein (1997). “Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases.” Journal of economic perspectives 11 (1) : 109 - 26.
  • 7Bowles, S. ( 2008 ). " Policies Designed for Self- Interested Citizens May Undermine " The Moral Sentiments: " Evidence from Economic Experiments." Nature 320 : 1605 - 09.
  • 8Cappelen, A., A. Hole, E. Sφrensen and B. Tungodden (2007). “The Pluralism of Fairness Ideals: An Experimental Approach.” American Economic Review 97(3): 818- 827.
  • 9Chamess, G. and B. Grosskopf, (2001). “Relative Payoffs and Happiness : An Experimental Study.” Journal of economic behavior and organization 45 ( 3 ) : 301-28.
  • 10Dawes, C. T., J. H. Fowler, T. Johnson, R. McElreath and O. Smirnov (2007). "Egalitarian Motives in Humans ." Nature 446 : 794 - 96.

共引文献9

同被引文献44

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部