期刊文献+

髓内钉InterTan治疗股骨近端骨折的早期疗效分析 被引量:16

Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures with Intramedullary Nail InterTan-Report of early Results
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:分析应用新一代股骨近端髓内钉(InterTan)治疗股骨近端骨折的早期临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2009年9月至2011年8月我科共收治股骨近端骨折患者共107例,均采用InterTan髓内钉系统进行治疗,其中男45例,女62例;年龄34-93岁,平均73.05岁。受伤肢体左侧63例,右侧44例。按AO分型,31-A1型32例,31-A2型59例,31-A3型16例。记录患者手术持续时间、并发症、死亡率、骨折愈合时间、末次复查Harris评分,并对比患者健侧及患侧术前、术中及术后1周的颈干角变化。所有数据采用SPSS 13.0进行统计分析。结果:平均手术持续时间为66.69分钟。颈干角:术前健侧:140.66±9.08度,术前患侧:118.00±15.49度,术中患侧:135.16±7.08度,术后1周患侧:137.51±15.21度。术前患侧颈干角与其他三组相比均有显著性差异(P<0.05),术前健侧、术中复位后患侧、术后1周患侧颈干角之间相比均无显著性差异。3例患者于随访过程中死亡,6例患者失访。98例患者获得随访,随访时间3-22个月,平均8.6个月。2例患者发生头钉切出,3例患者术后练习后出现股骨疼痛症状,未发生股骨干骨折。96例患者均获得骨性愈合,骨折愈合时间12~18周。临床疗效按Harris评分标准:41-92分,平均78.5分,优良率80.6%。结论:髓内钉InterTan是治疗股骨近端骨折的良好选择。 Objective: To analyze the indications and the clinical effects of intramedullary nail InterTan for proximal femoral frac- tures. Methods: We did a retrospective analysis about the clinical effects of treatment in proximal femoral fractures with intramedullary nail InterTan. 107 patients wo were admitted to our Department of Orthopaedic Surgery during September 2009 to August 2011. These 107 patients included 45 males and 62 females,mean aged 73.05 years(ranging 34-93 years),44 with right and 63 with left. AO classifica- tion 32 cases of type 31-A1 ,59 cases of type 31-A2, 16 cases of type 31-A3. To record operation time; complication; mortality; healing time; Harris score; compare collodiaphyseal angle of uninjured side andpreoperative;peroperative; postoperative with SPSS 13.0. Results: The average operation time was 66.69 min. Average collodiaphyseal angle: uninjured side: 140.66 ± 9.08 degree; preoperative: 118.00± 15.49degree; peroperative: 135.16± 7.08 degree;postoperative: 137.51 ± 15.21 degree. There was significant difference between collodi- aphyseal angle of preoperative to three series else (P〈0.05). There was no significant difference in collodiaphyseal angle of uninjured side; peroperative; postoperative. Three patients died, six were loss for follow-up, leaving 98 patients were followed up by 8.6 (ranging 3-22) months averagely. There was two cut-out. Three patients felt pain in femoral shaft after exercise, no fracture.96 case healed on the radio- graphs within the ranging 12-18 weeks. The Harris score at the final follow-up was average 78.5 scores (ranging 41-92), good and excel- lent rate of 80.6%. Conclusions: The intramedullary nail InterTan is a very good choice to treat proximal femoral fractures.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2012年第24期4701-4703,4669,共4页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
关键词 股骨近端骨折 股骨粗隆间骨折 股骨粗隆下骨折 INTERTAN 髓内钉 Proximal femoral fractures Intertrochanteric fractures Subtrochanteric fractures InterTan Intramedullary nail
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献46

  • 1黄杰烽,邓友章,万凌屹.髋部骨折与老年骨质疏松[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(40):127-129. 被引量:25
  • 2Huang JF, Deng YZ, Wan LY. Zhongguo Zuzhi Gongcheng Yanjiu yu Linchuang Kangfu. 2006;10(40):127-129.
  • 3Ruecker AH, Rupprecht M, Gruber M, et al. The treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: results using an intramedullary nail with integrated cephalocervical screws and linear compression. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(1 ):22-30.
  • 4S.Terry Canale. CANPBELL'S Operative Orthopaedics. Elsecier(Singapore) Pet Ltd. 2005;52:2760-2761.
  • 5Wang YC. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House. 2004: 867-882.
  • 6Ahrengart L, Tornkvist H, Fornander P, et al. A randomized study of the compression hip screw and Gamma nail in 426 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;(401):209-222.
  • 7Schipper IB, Marti RK, van der werken C. Unstable trochanteric femoral fractures: extramedullary or intramedullary fixation. Review of literature. Injury. 2004;35(2):142-151.
  • 8Hardy DC, Descamps PY, Krallis P, et al. Use of an intramedullary hip-screw compared with a compression hip-screw with a plate for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. A prospective, randomized study of one hundred patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80(5):618-630.
  • 9Madsen JE, Naess L, Aune AK, et al. Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hid screw. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12(4):241-248.
  • 10Lunsjo K, Ceder L, Tidermark J, et al. Extramedullary fixation of 107 subtrochanteric fractures: a randomized multicenter trial of the Medoff sliding plate versus 3 other screw-plate systems. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;70(5):459-466.

共引文献104

同被引文献138

  • 1方岳建,范颂鸣.动力髁螺钉或股骨近端髓内钉治疗股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈或转子间骨折的评价[J].中国基层医药,2006,13(6):898-899. 被引量:3
  • 2陈述伟,杨述华,杨超,叶哲伟,张劲松.老年人股骨转子周围骨折的特点及手术方法的选择[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(4):289-291. 被引量:97
  • 3唐佩福,姚琦,黄鹏,梁雨田,陶笙,郭义柱,张群,梁向党,屈波,王岩.股骨近端髓内钉-螺旋刀片治疗高龄骨质疏松性股骨转子间骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2007,9(7):622-624. 被引量:283
  • 4Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 3rd. Hip fractures in the elderly: aworld-wide projection[ J]. Osteoporos Int, 1992 , 2(6) :285-289.
  • 5Cummings SR,Rubin SM,Black D. The future of hip fractures in theUnited States. Numbers, costs, and potential effects of postmenopaus-al estrogen[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1990, .252) : 163-166.
  • 6DArrigo C, Carcangiii A, Perugia D, et al. Intertrochanteric frac-tures :comparison between two different locking nails[ J]. Int Or-thop,2012,36 (12) :2545-2551. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1684-5.
  • 7Zhang S, Zhang K, Jia Y, et al. InterTan nail versus ProximalFemoral Nail Antirotation-Asia in the treatment of unstable tro-chanteric fractures [ J ]. Orthopedics, 2013,36 (3 ) : e288-294,doi: 10. 3928/01477447-20130222-16.
  • 8Ruecker AH,Rupprecht M, Gruber M,et al. The treatment of in-tertrochanteric fractures: results using an intramedullary nail withintegrated cephalocervical screws and linear compression [ J ]. JOrthop Trauma, 2009,23(1) :22-30.
  • 9Abdulkareem IH. A review of tip apex distance in dynamic hipscrew fixation of osteoporotic hip fractures [ J ]. Niger Med J,2012,53(4) :184-191. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.107550.
  • 10刘福星,王伟,马双.老年股骨近端骨折治疗研究进展分析[J].中国保健营养,2012,6(6):578.

引证文献16

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部