试论能源就地转化与能源加工转换的关系

On the Relation between In situ Energy Conversion and Energy Processing and Conversion

由于我国煤炭运输的疲于奔命、天然气和电力输送的利益纷争以及能源产地对能源利益高回报的追求,国内的主要能源产地几乎都选择了能源就地转化。在低碳经济的战场,能源加工转换作为一种经济技术手段也鼎力相助。与能源实践中二者各显神通的景象相反,能源加工转换颇受我国能源立法与研究宠爱,能源就地转化却被彻底遗忘。这种反差使得从能源法理论上研究二者的关系尤为重要。然而,这一问题至今不为能源法学界所关注。以《能源法》为研究视角,运用比较的研究方法,结合能源利用实践的研究表明,二者在能源产业链中的位置、实施的条件、实施的后果和法律管制基本相同;二者的来源、实施主体、实施目的、法律地位和性质不同。

Because of China＇s overloaded freight capacity of coal, interest battle in natural gas and electrical power transportation and high demand of energy producing areas for its energy benefits, the main energy producing areas in China almost exclusively select the mode of in situ energy conversion. While in the low carbon economy market, energy processing and conversion, as an economic and technological means, also helps to a great extent. In contrast to the equal emphasis they have received in energy practice, energy processing and conversion has got much attention in Chinese energy legislation and its research, but in situ energy conversion is forgotten completely. The contrast makes the research on the relationship between the two very important in terms of the theory of energy law. However, this issue has not yet got due attention from energy law community. In the view of Energy Law and by adopting a comparative approach and combining the practice of energy use, we can come to a conclusion that in situ energy conversion and energy processing and conversion are basically the same in the location of energy industry chain, implementation conditions and implementation consequences and legal regulation, but quite different in source, implementation subject, implementation aim and legal position and nature.