期刊文献+

指类句的指称问题研究——一种词汇语用学的视角 被引量:5

A Lexical Pragmatic Approach to Generic Sentences
原文传递
导出
摘要 指类句是指一类事物都具有某种属性,通常被解读为一种规律(如"鸟会飞")。但是,指类句逻辑上不是全称命题,因为它们可以容忍例外事物(如"鸟会飞,但是企鹅不会飞")。从词汇语用学的角度看,指类句"以偏概全"的指称特点涉及语义—语用接口问题。指类句是主题结构,其命题内容是相对于某个主题而言的,因而,主题限定了指类词的指称域。指类句在认知上是一种参照点结构,该结构为语用充实的认知操作提供了基础条件。指类句能够容忍例外,是指类词概念意义的语用充实中的意义收缩的结果。这是因为指类句的理解中,指类词概念意义的语用充实是在最佳关联的原则指导下,需要从指称域中选择合格的对象以获取最佳语境效果。 Generic sentences ascribe certain property to a kind of entities, and thus are understood as rule/regularity-like assertions (e. g. , Birds fly. ). However, generic sentences are not universal propositions logically, for they tolerate exceptions ( e. g. , Birds fly; but penguins can' t. ). From the lexical pragmatics perspective, this feature involves semantic-pragmatic interface. As a thematic construction, the propositional contents are true of certain themes. That is, the theme defines the reference domain of generic terms. Generic sentences are of reference point structure if considered from the cognitive perspective. On this basis, pragmatic enrichment of the generic terms is performed. The tolerance of exceptions results from pragmatic narrowing of conceptual meaning of the generic terms. The reason is this : the optimal relevance principle governs the process of pragmatic enrichment, and the cognitive process is to select the entities that embody the property predicated by the generic terms.
出处 《外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期36-40,共5页 Foreign Language Education
基金 教育部规划基金项目"指类句的认知语用研究"(项目编号:10YJA740095) 山东省教育厅人文社科研究项目"指类句的语用研究"(项目编号:J10WD64)的阶段性成果
关键词 指类句 关联理论 语用充实 语义—语用接口 主题 generic sentence Relevance Theory pragmatic enrichment semantic-pragmatic interface theme
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Blutner, R. Lexical pragmatics [J]. Journal of Semantics, 1998 (15) : 115-162.
  • 2Chafe, W. L. Giveness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, top- ics, mad point of view[A]. In C. Li(ed. ). Subject and Topic[C]. New York : Academic Press, 1976 : 25-56.
  • 3Cucatto, A. Linguistic "themes": The agent figurative construction and its relation with thematization [ J ]. Sintagma, 2003 ( 15 ) : 43- 60.
  • 4De Hoop, H. & De Swart, H. Topic and focus[A]. L. Chen & R. Sybesma( eds. ). The First Glot International State-of-the-Art Book: The Latest in Linguistics [ C ]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter,2000: 105- 130.
  • 5Declerck, R. The pragmatics of It-clefts and WH-clefts[ J]. Lingua, 1984,64(4) : 251-289.
  • 6Dooley, R. A. Explorations in discurse topicality [ J ]. SIL Electronic Working Papers (SILEWP) ,2007 ( 10 ) : 1-166.
  • 7Halliday, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [ M ]. London: Edward Arnold, 1985.
  • 8Hedberg, N. Topic-focus constoversies [ A ]. Valeria Molnar and Sus- anne Winkler ( eds. ). The Architecture of Focus [ C ]. New York : Mouton de Gruyter,2006: 1-25.
  • 9Langaeker, R. W. Topic, subject, and possessor[A]. Simonsen, H. G. & Endresen, R. T. ( eds. ). A Cognitive Approach to Verbs [ C ]. Walter de Gruyter,200 l : 11-48.
  • 10Lee, Chungmin. What are generic sentences about? [ A]. In A. Ish- ikawa & Y. Nitta( eds. ). The Proceedings of the 1994 Kyoto PACL1C Conference [ C]. Tokyo: The Logico-Linguistic Society of Japan, 1995 : 1-10. Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. Communication : Cognition and Relevance[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2001.

二级参考文献111

共引文献329

同被引文献46

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部