期刊文献+

论违宪审查制度 被引量:2

On Constitutional Review
下载PDF
导出
摘要 违宪审查制度是对宪法本身乃至于宪政秩序进行维护的制度性保障机制,该制度已经在世界上大多数国家生根落户,并在维护宪政秩序方面发挥着不可替代的作用。通过对世界各国违宪审查制度进行审视和考察,可以从审查机构到审查程序两个方面,对分散式违宪审查和集中式违宪审查这两种审查模式的产生原因及实际效果进行探究分析,以期对我国违宪审查制度的建构起到参考作用。 Constitutional review is institutional guarantee mechanism which safeguards the constitution and constitutional order. This mechanism has already settled in many countries, and played an irreplaceable role in securing the constitutional order. Through the observation and study of Constitutional review mechanism in various countries, the text investigate the origin and the effect of two review mode, the centralized mode and the decentralized mode, from the review body to the review procedure, and analyze the advantages and the disadvantages of these two mode.
出处 《江苏警官学院学报》 2012年第4期35-39,共5页 Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute
关键词 违宪审查 司法审查 制度性保障机制 constitutional review, judicial review, system guarantee mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1张于帆:《宪法学导论》,法律出版社2004年版,第175.176页.
  • 2Mauro Cappelltti: Judicial Review in Comparative Perspective, Califomia Law Review, Vlolume 58, October 1970, p.1034, pp.1045-1049.
  • 3Justice Robert F. Utter and David C. Lundsgaard: Judicial Review in the New Nations of Central and Eastern Europe: Some Thoughts from a Comparative Perspective, Ohio State Law Journal, Volume 54,Number3, 1993, pp.586-587.
  • 4Gottfried Dietze: Judicial Review In Europe, Michigan Law Review, Volume55, 1957,p.555.
  • 5Alec Stone Sweet: Why Europe Reject American Judicial Review-and Why It May Not Matter, Michigan Law Review, Volume 101,2003, p.2760.
  • 6Mauro Cappelltti: Judicial Review in Comparative Perspective, California Law Review, Volume 58, October 1970, p. 1044.
  • 7Alec Stone Sweet: Why Europe Reject American Judicial Review-and Why It May Not Matter, Michigan Law Review, Volume 101,2003, p.2767, p.2768.
  • 8Mauro Cappelltti: Judicial Review in Comparative Perspective, California Law Review, Vlolume 58, October 1970, pp.1038-1039.
  • 9Mauro Cappelltti: The "Mighty Problem" of Judicial Review and the Contribution of Comparative Analysis, Southern California Law Review, Volume 53, 1979, pp.417-418.
  • 10Mauro Cappelltti: The "Mighty Problem" of Judicial Review and the Contribution of Comparative Analysis, Southern California Law Review, Volume 53, 1979, pp.414-416. -37-.

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部