摘要
在国际商事仲裁中,仲裁庭具有认定证据可采性的自由裁量权,不必严格适用各国民事诉讼中的证据可采性规则。不过就一些具体的证据可采性问题,国际上形成了一般实践。仲裁庭在认定证据的可采性时,除了考虑相关性,还可能考虑效率、仲裁费用等因素。另外,仲裁庭认定证据可采性的权力并非没有限制。我国相关仲裁实践存在一些问题,与国际一般实践相脱离,应予以纠正。
In international commerce arbitration, the arbitral tribunal enjoys an extensive discretionary power over the adoptability of evidence, and needn' t strictly apply the relevant regulations of various countries. But on some specific problems about the adoptability of evidence, there are some common practices. When the arbitral tribunal is affirming the adoptability of the evidence, the factors such as efficiency, arbitration expense, etc. will probably be taken into account besides the correlation of evidence. Moreover, the relevant power en- joyed by the arbitral tribunal is not unlimited. China shall adopt the common practices in solving such prob- Ictus.
出处
《西南政法大学学报》
2012年第4期74-81,共8页
Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
国际商事仲裁
证据
采纳
可采性
international commerce arbitration
evidence
adoption
adoptability