小骨窗血肿清除术和传统开颅手术治疗脑溢血的临床疗效比较

Clinical Effect Research of Small Bone Window Craniotomy and Traditional Craniotomy Operation in Treatment of Cerebral Hemorrhage

目的探讨小骨窗血肿清除术和传统开颅手术治疗脑溢血的临床疗效。方法随机选取在我院治疗的高血压脑出血患者60例,分为观察组和对照组。对照组(30例)使用传统开颅手术治疗;观察组(30例)小骨窗血肿清除术进行治疗。对比两组治疗过程、临床疗效、并发症等指标。结果与对照组对比,观察组手术时间、住院时间均较少,差异有统计学意义,P<0.05。观察组总有效率达93.3%,高于对照组的66.7%,且并发症较少。结论小骨窗血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血疗效显著,创伤小,并发症少,方便快速。

Objective To explore the clinic effect of small bone window craniotomy and traditional craniotomy operation in treatment of cerebral hemorrhage. Methods Randomly selected 60 cases of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage treated in our hospital, and divided into the observation group and the control group. The control group used traditional craniotomy operation, the observation group used small bone window craniotomy.Compared two kinds of retainer of treatment process.clinical efficacy, complications and other indicators. Results Compared with the control group, the operation time and hospital stay time of the observation group were less, with significant differences, P〈0.05. In the observation group, the total effective rate was 93.3%, higher than that of control group（66.7%）, while it had fewer complications. Conclusions Small bone window craniotomy in treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage has notable curative effect, convenient and fast, with little trauma and less complications.