期刊文献+

门急诊患者危重症的筛查及处理 被引量:3

Emergency department screening and treatment of critically ill patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过探索制定的潜在危重症患者的筛查程序,减少临床上的误诊误治,提高危重症的救治成功率。方法选取2010年1月至2012年1月急诊治疗的危重症患者292例,采用APACHEII评分系统评分并计算预计死亡危险度,比较其与患者实际病情转归的差异。结果①存活患者的A-PACHEII评分与预计死亡危险度均明显低于死亡患者(t=7.94,t=9.40;P<0.05;)②有患者的A-PACHEII评分下的预计死亡危险度为13.81%,实际病死率为9.9%,经校准度衡量,无明显差异(P>0.05),提示APACHEII评分对于预后的分析较为准确。结论潜在危重症患者的筛查程序,能快速筛选出需要紧急抢救的危重患者,提高抢救效益及质量。 Objective To explore the development of potential by critically ill patients screening program,reduce clinical misdiagnosis and mistreatment,improve the success rate of treatment of critically ill patients.Methods From 2010January-2012January of emergency treatment of292 critically ill patients,using APACHE II scoring system and the calculation of the expected score of risk of death of patients,compared with the actual prognosis difference.Results The survival in patients with APACHE II score and predict risk of death were significantly lower than those of dead patients(t= 7.94,t=9.40;P〈 0.05;APACHE) the patients with II score of expected death risk was 13.81%,the mortality rate was 9.9%,the calibration measurement,no difference(P〉 0.05),APACHE II prompts for prognostic analysis more accurate score.Conclusion The potential of critically ill patients with the screening procedures,can quickly screen out need for emergency rescue of critically ill patients,improving the rescue efficiency and quality.
出处 《中国实用医药》 2012年第23期37-38,共2页 China Practical Medicine
基金 深圳市宝安区科技计划项目(项目编号:20110408035)
关键词 门诊急诊 危重症 筛查 APACHEII评分 Outpatient emergency; Critically ill; Screening; APACHE II score
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献12

  • 1Re M,Crit Care Med,2000年,28卷,8期,2819页
  • 2Forsythe SM, Schmidt GA, Sodium bicarbonate for the treatment of lactic acidosis[J]. Chest, 2000,117( 1 ) :260 - 267.
  • 3Bakker J, Gris P, Coffernils M, et al. Serial blood lactate levels can predict the development of multiple organ failure following sepsis shock[J]. Am J Surg, 1996,171 (2) :221 - 226.
  • 4Cusack RJ, Rholdes A, Lochhead P, et al. The strong ion gap does not have prognostic value in critically ill patients in a mixed medical/surgical adult ICU[J]. Intensive Care. Med,2002,28(7):864-869.
  • 5Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. The ACCP/SCCM Consenus Conference Committee: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Meal, 1992,20: 864.
  • 6Yoshirnoto Y, Tanaka Y, Hoya K. Acute systemic inflammatory response syndrome in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke, 2001,32 (9) :1989-1993.
  • 7傅诚强,张延龄.外科病人的危险评分[J].国外医学(创伤与外科基本问题分册),1999,20(4):232-234. 被引量:3
  • 8江学成.危重疾病严重程度评分临床应用和意义[J].中国危重病急救医学,2000,12(4):195-197. 被引量:287
  • 9梁建业.第3代危重患者病情评价系统——APACHE、SAPSⅡ和MPMⅡ[J].中国危重病急救医学,2000,12(4):249-253. 被引量:53
  • 10钱礼.我对急性胰腺炎诊治的几点看法[J].中国实用外科杂志,2000,20(5):271-272. 被引量:46

共引文献78

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部