期刊文献+

华发林药物相互作用检索工具的评价

Evaluation of Domestic and foreign prescription-checked software for warfarin interactions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:综合评价国内外药物相互作用查询软件。方法:以华发林为例用80对药物相互作用对每个软件进行测试,通过考查每个软件的灵敏性、特异性以及阳性和阴性结果的预测性评出准确性得分,通过药物相互作用的解释内容条目得出项目得分,每个软件用同样的3对药物进行测试检索时间,记录得分,累加上述3项分数为综合得分,综合得分越高,软件的功能性越好。结果:efact和lex-comp online综合得分分别为706分和680分,列前两位,对药物相互作用解释的项目内容也最全面(8项)。国内的药物咨询软件A、B的综合得分分别为646分和641分,列第3和第4,这两个软件查询速度最快,但对药物相互作用内容的解释还不够全面,与得分最高的efact软件尚有较大差距。免费软件的各项功能均不如收费软件。结论:国内软件与国外软件总体差别不大,付费软件综合性能好于免费软件。 Objective : Comprehensive evaluation of domestic and foreign drug interaction query software. Methods : Chinese so~ wares A and B and foreign softwares including Efact, lex - comp, Drug reference and Drugs reference online were evaluated. Ac- curacy, comprehensiveness and analysis speed of every software were investigated. Each program was assessed for accuracy using 40 clinically important and 40 clinically unimportant drug interaction pairs. Accuracy was scored through the summation of software sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. The comprehensiveness of each program was determined by thenumber of components in the drug interaction monograph, such as seriousness, speed, mechanism, reference level, discussion, and corresponding drugs etc. Time needed to identify the management of three important drug interactions defined each program' s ease of use. The aggregate scores for accuracy, comprehensiveness, and ease of use were calculated, the higher, the better. Re- sults : Efact and lex - comp stayed at the top two places by 706 and 680 points respectively with the complete interpretation for drug interactions (8 items). Scoring 646 and 641 points and with the most rapid enquire, domestic software A and B ranked third and fourth, but their description of drug interactions were less complete. The functions of the softwares charged were better than those free. Conclusion:There is a little difference between Chinese and other country' s softwares for drug interactions, and interpretation for drug interaction of the softwares charged is more comprehensive than those discharged.
作者 吴兰红
机构地区 南开大学
出处 《天津药学》 2012年第4期34-37,共4页 Tianjin Pharmacy
关键词 药物相互作用 华发林 质量评价 drug interactions, warfarin, quality evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1吴苑珊,郑企琨,黎月玲,毕绮丽,敖慧君.利用计算机软件对临床药物相互作用审查分析[J].医药导报,2003,22(11):822-823. 被引量:2
  • 2胡明,赖琪,蒲剑,刘一飞.美国药物相互作用计算机审查系统的发展与应用概况[J].中国医院药学杂志,2001,21(1):42-43. 被引量:16
  • 3Holbrook A M. Pereira J A, Labiris R, et al Systematic overview of warfarin and its drug and food interaction. Arch Inter Med,2005,165 (5) :1095.
  • 4Meyer J R,Joyce A. Generali ,JL. Karpinski. Evaluation of Herbal - drug interaction data in tertiary resources. Hosp Pharm,2004,39(2) :149.
  • 5Barrons R. Evaluation of personal digital assistant software for drug inter- action. Am J Health Syst Pharm,2004,61 ( 2 ) : 380.
  • 6Kimberly A Gait, Ann M Rule, et al. Personal digital assistant - based drug information sources : potential to improve medication safety. J Med Li- br Assoc ,2005,93 (2) :229.

二级参考文献5

  • 1陈新谦 金有豫.新编药物学(第14版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1998.48.
  • 2周维书.药物相互作用—原理和生化基础[M].北京:科学出版社,1991.17-19.
  • 3陈新谦,新编药物学(第14版),1998年,21页
  • 4周元瑶,药物流行病学,1996年,5页
  • 5吴永佩.大众健康呼唤临床药师[J].中国处方药,2003,2(2):46-46. 被引量:31

共引文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部