期刊文献+

叶肢介颈器的超微形态特征及其演化意义

EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE OF MORPHOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN THE DORSAL ORGAN OF CLAM SHRIMPS
原文传递
导出
摘要 颈器的构造与功能在甲壳动物的演化过程中存在明显差异,其同源性受到质疑。本研究在叶肢介颈器的超微形态比较与分子系统学分析基础上,对该器官的同源性进行了讨论。颈器的超微形态分析表明,叶肢介的颈器形态多样,包括椭圆形、马蹄形、花边形、梨核形等,其中马蹄形、花边形、梨核形颈器为首次报道类型。颈器的形态在属与种分类级别上呈现一定的稳定性,如马蹄形颈器出现在2属4种个体上。基于分子数据的系统发生分析为评判颈器的同源性与演化意义提供了依据。系统分析表明,颈器并非鳃足纲与颚足类的共有衍征,而可能是泛甲壳动物的祖征;鳃足纲渔乡蚌虫科颈器存在3种状态特征:包括具颈器但不突出,颈器显著突出呈梨形,以及颈器不同程度的退化或丢失。颈器的形态特征可作为种或属级别上分类的辅征。 Comparative analyses of external morphology, internal structure, and functional interpretation suggest that dorsal organs of Crustaeea are probably not all homologous. In this study we have examined the morphology of the dorsal organ in eight species of Laevicaudata and Spinicaudata from China, and have analyzed our results together with previously documented occurrences of branchiopod dorsal organs within the phylogenetic framework established on the basis of the COI gene from 18 species of Spinicaudata. We illustrate five morphological forms of dorsal organ, oval, subrectangufar, horseshoe, petal and pear-core. These morphologies of dorsal organ are stable amongst individuals of species and genera; therefore we suggest that such features of dorsal organs may be used as auxiliary criteria in the classification of clamp shrimps. For example, the horseshoe type occurs in four species and two genera of Spinicaudata.Given the inter-generic relationships suggested by molecular phylogeny, the evolutionary history of the dorsal organ within the branchiopods is interpreted and illustrated. The most parsimonious reconstruction using MacClade suggests that an unelevated dorsal organ is the ancestral state for Limnadiidae and that the pyriform form is a synapomorphy for Metalimnadia + Eulimnadia + Limnadiopsis + Limnadia AU. In contrast the shared presence at the next level higher in the hierarchy of a pyriform form of dorsal organ in Limnadia lenticularis and Metalimnadia + Eulimnadia + Limnadiopsis + Limnadia AU is interpreted as a result of parallel evolution.
作者 孙晓艳 杨群
出处 《古生物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期281-289,共9页 Acta Palaeontologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(40902004,40572070,TSXK0801) 中国科学院地学与生命科学交叉项目(KZCX2-YW-JC104) 中国科学院-国家外国专家局创新团队国际合作伙伴计划 中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所现代古生物学和地层学国家重点实验室项目资助
关键词 鳃足纲 蚌壳虾 颈器 超微形态特征 COI系统发育分析 扫描电镜 Branchiopoda clam shrimp dorsal organ morphology COI phylogeny SEM
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Copeland D E, 1966. Salt transport organelle in Artemia salenis (brine shrimp). Science, 151: 470-471.
  • 2Crasquin S, Racheboeu P R, Bergstr6m J, 2009. Sensory structures of Archaeostraea (Phyllocaridida, Crustacea). Evolution and Development, 11 (2): 225-232.
  • 3Criel R J G, 1991. Ontogeny of Artemia. In: Browne R A, Sorge- loos P, Clive N A (eds), Artemia Biology. Boston: CRC Press LLC. 155-185.
  • 4Croghan P C, 1958. The osmotic and ionic regulation of Artemia sa- lina (L.). Journal o: Experimental Biology, 351 219 233.
  • 5DuNan-shan(堵南山),1987.Crustaceology (Vol. 1). Beijing: Sci-ence Press. 45, 71.
  • 6Ewing R D, Peterson G L, Conte F P, 1974. Larval salt gland of Artemia salina nauplii. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 88: 217-234.
  • 7Fincham A A, 1988. Ontogeny of anomouraneyes. In: Fincham A A, Rainbow P S (eds.), Aspects of Decapod Crustacean Biolo- gy. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 123-155.
  • 8Fioroni P, 1980. Das Dorsalorgan der Arthropoden unter besonderer Berucksichtigung der malacostraken Krebse. Zoologische Jahrbticher, Abteilung Anatomie, 104: 425-465.
  • 9HoehW R, Smallwood W R N D, Senyo D M, Chapman E G, Weeks S C, 2006. Evaluating the monophyly of Eulimnadia and the Limnadiinae (Branehiopoda: Spinieaudata) using DNA se- quences. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 26 (2) : 182-192.
  • 10Jensen P G, Hoeg J T, Bower S, Rybakov A V, 1994a. Scanning e- lectron microscopy of lattice organs in cyprids of the Rhizoceph- ala Akentrogonida (Crustacea Cirripedia). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 77:1018-1026.

二级参考文献35

  • 1AX P,1999.Phyllopodomorpha.In:Das System der Metazoa II.Ein Lehrbuch der phylogenetischen Systematik,G.Fischer,Mainz,156-168.
  • 2CASH-CLARK C E,MARTI N J W,1994.Ultrastructure of thefrontal sensory fields in the Lynceidae(Crustacae,Branchiopo-da,Laevicaudata).Journal of Morphology,221:153-160.
  • 3CREASE T,1999.The complete sequence of the mitochondrial ge-nome of Daphnia pulex(Cladocera:Crustacea).Gene,233:89-99.
  • 4DEWAARDJ R,SACHEROVA V,CRISTESCU M E A,REMI-GIO E A,CREASE TJ,HEBERT P D N,2006.Probing therelationships of the branchiopod crustaceans.Molecular Phylo-genetics and Evolution,39(2):491-502.
  • 5FRYER G,1987.Anewclassfication of the branchiopod Crustacea.Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society,91(4):357-383.
  • 6HANCOCK J M,TAUTZ D,DOVER G A,1988.Evolution ofsecondary structures and compensatory mutations of the riboso-mal RNAs of Drosophila melanogaster.Mol Biol Evol,5:393-414.
  • 7HANNER R,FUGATE M,1997.Branchiopod phylogenetic recon-struction from12S rDNA sequence data.J.Crust.Biol,17:174-183.
  • 8HILLIS D M,HUELSENBECKJ P,1992.Signal,noise,and relia-bility in molecular phylogenetic analyses.Journal of Heredity,83:189-195.
  • 9HUELSENBECK J P,RONQUIST F,2001.Mrbayes:Bayesian inference of phylogeny.Bioinformatics,17:754,755.
  • 10KISHI NO H,HASEGAWA M,1989.Evaluation of the maximumlikelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies fromDNAsequence data,and the branching order in Hominoidea.Journal of Molecular Evolution,29:170-179.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部