期刊文献+

腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统开放手术对比研究 被引量:2

Comparative study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and traditional open cholecystectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的旨在探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)与传统开腹手术(OC)的临床效果与安全性。方法将104例良性胆囊疾病患者分为LC组(采取腹腔镜胆囊切除术)74例和OC组(采取传统开腹胆囊切除术)70例,观察两组患者手术及术后并发症发生情况,进行统计学比较。结果 LC组病人的手术所用时间、出血量、切口大小、肠道功能的恢复时间、术后镇痛药物使用及住院时间均少或短于OC组。LC组有1例发生切口感染,OC组5例发生切口感染,2例切口局部血肿,LC组术后并发症发生率明显低于OC组。结论 LC与OC相比较,降低了病人损伤程度、加快了术后恢复速度、减少了并发症的发生,LC是治疗良性胆囊疾病较好的手术方式,临床应该借鉴应用。 Objective To probe clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) and traditional open cholecystectomy(OC). Methods 104 patients with benign gallbladder disease were divided LC group(74 cases) and OC group(70 cases). The operative and postoperative complications of two groups were observed and compared. Results There were significant difference in operation time,volume of blood loss during operation,length ofincision,gastrointestinalfunction restoring time,postoperative use of analgesics and hospital stay between two groups. In LC group, infections ofincision in 1 patient;In OC group, infections ofincisional wound in 5 patients,and local hematoma ofincision in 2 patients. The rate of complications was lower in LC group than these in OC group. Conclusion LC has strong points of slight damage,postoperative quick recovery and less complications,and is optimal operation for benign gallbladder disease.
作者 陈刚
出处 《中外医疗》 2012年第24期22-23,共2页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 腹腔镜胆囊切除术 功能恢复 传统开放胆囊切除术 切口感染 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Functional recorery Traditional open cholecystectomy Incisional infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献20

共引文献12

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部