期刊文献+

面向制造装备加工工艺与性能需求转换的质量屋依赖与反馈模型 被引量:7

Quality House Model with Dependence and Feedback for Manufacturing Equipment Process and Performance Requirements Conversion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分析制造装备开发考虑因素及工艺与性能需求转换过程,为表达用户性能需求、加工工艺需求和制造装备技术特性间依赖与反馈关系,构建制造装备加工工艺与性能需求转换质量屋网络分析法模型。通过模糊决策试验与评价实验室方法综合影响矩阵,代替加权超矩阵,实现依赖与反馈关系的转换,并获得技术特性初始重要度;基于系统化设计思想,考虑产品竞争性、售后服务、成本和环境等因素对技术特性的影响,建立模糊数据包络分析线性规划模型。将技术特性看作一个决策单元,该技术特性的初始重要度和服务看作是输出指标,产品竞争性、成本和环境等因素评估值看作是输入指标,规范化决策单元的效率指标值,优化技术特性最终重要程度。以数控机床产品规划为实例,验证提出方法的可行性和有效性。 An analysis on muilti factors and uncertainty in the manufacturing equipment planning process is provided. Quality house analytic network process(ANP) model is constructed to describe the dependent and feedback relationships among the factors, such as customer performance requirement, customer process requirement and product engineering characteritics. Aiming at a conversion between the relationships, ANP weighted super matrix is replaced by fuzzy decision trial and evaluation laboratory(FDEMATEL) total relation matrix in order to obtain the engineering chanracteriscs intial importance degree. Based on systematic design idea, a fuzzy data envelopment analysis(FDEA) linear model is constructed to take into consideration the influence, which is caused by product competitiveness, service, cost, environment, and so on. In the FDEA model, an engineering characteritics is a decision making units(DMU); its initial importance degree and service effect are output; product competitiveness, cost and environment effect are input; normalized efficiency value is the DMU optimized importance degree. The intergrated model is illustrated on a case study problem in NC machine tools planning. The results are then validated, showing the overall soundness of the approach.
出处 《机械工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第15期164-172,共9页 Journal of Mechanical Engineering
基金 国家科技重大专项(2012ZX04010011) 国家自然科学基金(50905159)资助项目
关键词 加工工艺需求 需求转换 产品规划 质量屋 Process requirements, Requirements conversion ,Product planning ,Quality house
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1LI Yantai, TANG Jiafu, CHIN Kwaisang. Estimating the final priority ratings of engineering characteristics in mature-period product improvement by MDBA and AHP [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 131(2): 575-586.
  • 2SENER Z, KARSAK E E. A decision model for setting target levels in quality fimction deployment using nonlinear programming-based fuzzy regression and optimization [J]. International Journal of AdvancedManufacturing Technology, 2010, 48(9-12): 1173-1184.
  • 3LEE A H I, KANG H Y, YANG C Y, et al. An evaluation framework for product planning using FANP, QFD and multi-choice goal programming[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2010, 48(13): 3977-3997.
  • 4HOYLE C J, CHEN Wei. Product attribute function deployment(PAFD) for decision-based conceptual design [J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2009, 56(2): 271-284.
  • 5SAKAO T. A QFD-centred design methodology for environmentally conscious product design[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2007, 45(18-19): 4143-4162.
  • 6李柏姝,雒兴刚,唐加福.基于灵敏度分析的产品族规划方法[J].机械工程学报,2010,46(15):117-124. 被引量:9
  • 7任朝晖,宋乃慧,李小彭,闻邦椿,陈以增.质量功能配置方法中模糊信息建模[J].机械工程学报,2007,43(5):64-68. 被引量:11
  • 8李延来,唐加福,姚建明,蒲云,徐捷.质量屋中顾客需求改进重要度的确定方法[J].机械工程学报,2007,43(11):110-118. 被引量:19
  • 9CHANG D Y. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP [J]. European Journal of Operationa Research, 1996, 95(3): 649-655.
  • 10GENG Xiuli, CHU Xuening, XUE Deyi, et al. An integrated approach for rating engineering characteristics' final importance in product-service system development[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2010, 59(4): 585-594.

二级参考文献42

  • 1路甬祥.工程设计的发展趋势和未来[J].机械工程学报,1997,33(1):1-8. 被引量:108
  • 2Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,Jiang Yunfeng,Incorporating cost and environmental factors in quality function deployment using data envelopment analysis[J].Omega,The International Journal of Management Science(2007),doi:10.1016/j.omega.2007.12.003.
  • 3Jaroslav Ramík,Josef ímnek.Inequality relation between fuzzy numbers and its use in fuzzy optimization[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1985,16(2):123-138.
  • 4Herrmann A,Huber F,Braunstein C.Market-driven and service design:Bridging the gap between customer need,quality management and customer satisfaction[J].Int J Production Economics,2000,66:77-96.
  • 5Hauser John R,Don Clausing.The House of quality[J].Harvard Business Review,1988,66(3):63-73.
  • 6Tacho P K,Jae K.Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality.Journal of Operation Management,1998,16:569-581.
  • 7Chen Yi-zeng,Richard Y.K.Fung,Tang Jia-fu.Rating technical attributes in fuzzy QFD by integrating fuzzy weighted average method and fuzzy expected value operator[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2006,174(3,1):1553-1566.
  • 8Tang Jia-fu,Richard Y.K.Fung,et al.A new approach to quality function deployment planning with financial consideration.Computer & Operations Research,2002,29(11):1447-1463.
  • 9Jürgen Bode,Richard Y.K.Fung.Cost engineering with quality function deployment[J].Computers & Industrial Engineering,1998,35(3-4):587-590.
  • 10PINE B J.Mass customization:The new frontier in business competition[M].Boston:Harvard Business School Press,1993.

共引文献38

同被引文献70

引证文献7

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部